| Literature DB >> 28526810 |
Pei-Ming Yang1,2, Chia-Jung Chou2, Ssu-Hsueh Tseng1, Chien-Fu Hung1,3.
Abstract
The clinical management and treatment of cervical cancer, one of the most commonly diagnosed cancers and a leading cause of cancer-related female death, remains a huge challenge for researchers and health professionals. Cervical cancer can be categorized into two major subtypes: common squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) and adenocarcinoma (AC). Although it is a relatively rare histological subtype of cervical cancer, there has been a steady increase in the incidences of AC. Therefore, new strategies to treat cervical cancer are urgently needed. In this study, the potential uses of IFNγ-based therapy for cervical cancer were evaluated using bioinformatics approaches. Gene expression profiling identified that cell cycle dysregulation was a major hallmark of cervical cancer including SCC and AC subtypes, and was associated with poor clinical outcomes for cervical cancer patients. In silico and in vitro experimental analyses demonstrated that IFNγ treatment could reverse the cervical cancer hallmark and induce cell cycle arrest and apoptosis. Furthermore, we demonstrated that apigenin could enhance the anticancer activity of IFNγ in a HeLa cervical AC cell line by targeting cyclin-dependent kinase 1. Taken together, the present study suggests the selective therapeutic potential of IFNγ alone or in combination with apigenin for managing cervical SCC and AC.Entities:
Keywords: cell cycle; cervical cancer; drug repurposing; flavonoid; interferon
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28526810 PMCID: PMC5542256 DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.17574
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Oncotarget ISSN: 1949-2553
Figure 1The anticancer effect of IFNγ on cervical cancer
(A) HeLa and SiHa cells were treated with the indicated doses of IFNγ for 72 h, and then cell viability was examined by MTT assay. A p value of < 0.01 (**) or < 0.001(***) indicates significant differences between IFNγ-treated and control cells. (B) The microarray data of IFNγ-treated HeLa cells were analyzed by GSEA. The most upregulated and downregulated genes were illustrated on a heat map. Top-50 genes upregulated and downregulated by IFNγ were further analyzed by the FunRich software for pathway enrichment. Pathways were ranked according to the p value (red bar). A p value lower than 0.05 (yellow bar) was considered significant. The blue bar indicated the percentage of altered genes in a whole pathway. (C) HeLa cells were treated with 100 ng/mL IFNγ for 24, 48, and 72 h, and then cell cycle distribution was examined by flow cytometry.
Figure 2Analysis for the hallmark of cervical cancer
(A) DEGs obtained from cervical cancerous v.s. normal tissues were analyzed by the FunRich software for pathway enrichment. Pathways were ranked according to the p value (red bar). A p value less than 0.05 (yellow bar) was considered significant. The blue bar indicated the percentage of altered genes in a whole pathway. (B) The network of CxCa-DEGs was reconstituted by the STRING database.
Summary of 7 cohorts of cervical cancer microarray data sets
| GEO accession number | Description | No. of normal tissues | No. of cancer tissues | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GSE7803 | Normal squamous cervical epithelia samples and invasive squamous cell carcinomas of the cervix | 10 | 21 | [ |
| GSE29570 | Healthy exocervix and cervical cancer biopsy (cancer type was not specified in this data set) | 17 | 45 | [ |
| GSE39001 (GPL201) | Healthy endocervix/exocervix and HPV16-positive cervical cancer biopsy (29 were squamous cell carcinomas, 13 were adenocarcinomas, and 1 was adenosquamous carcinoma) | 12 | 43 | [ |
| GSE39001 (GPL6244) | Healthy exocervix and HPV16-positive cervical cancer biopsy (18 were squamous cell carcinomas and 1 were adenocarcinoma) | 5 | 19 | [ |
| GSE52903 | Healthy exocervix and squamous cell carcinomas of the cervix (51 were squamous cell carcinomas, 3 were adenocarcinomas, and 1 was adenosquamous carcinoma) | 17 | 55 | [ |
| GSE63514 | Normal cervical epithelium and cervical squamous epithelial cancer | 24 | 28 | [ |
| GSE67522 | HPV-negative normal cervical tissues and HPV-positive cervical squamous epithelial cancer tissues | 12 | 20 | [ |
The microarray data were downloaded from the NCBI-GEO database. The differential expressed genes (DEGs) from each data set were used to enrich pathways (Figure 2) and to query the CMap (Figure 7).
The gene list for the differentially expressed genes of cervical cancer (CxCa-DEGs) and the cervical cancer signature (CxCa-Sig)
| CxCa-DEGs | CxCa-Sig | |
|---|---|---|
| Upregulated genes | AURKA, BIRC5, BUB1, CDC20, CDC45, CDK1, CDKN2A, CENPA, CKS1B, CKS2, DNMT1, GINS2, HLTF, KIF11, KIF23, KIF2C, MCM5, MCM6, NDC80, NEK2, NUSAP1, PLAU, POLE2, PRC1, RAD51AP1, RFC4, RFC5, SMC4, STMN1, SYCP2, TACC3, TIMELESS, TK1, TOP2A, TOPBP1, TPX2, TTK, TYMS (38 genes) | AURKA, BIRC5, BUB1, CDC20, CDC45, CDK1, CDKN2A, CENPA, CKS1B, CKS2, GINS2, KIF11, KIF23, KIF2C, MCM5, MCM6, NDC80, NEK2, POLE2, PRC1, RFC4, RFC5, SMC4, STMN1, TACC3, TIMELESS, TK1, TOP2A, TOPBP1, TPX2, TTK, TYMS (32 genes) |
| Downregulated genes | CDA, CFD, CRNN, EDN3, ENDOU, GSTA4, LDOC1, PDGFD, PPP1R3C, UPK1A (10 genes) | CDA (1 gene) |
CxCa-DEGs represented the overlapped DEGs from 7 microarray data sets. The network of CxCa-DEGs was reconstructed by the STRING database. The genes directly linked to each other were used as a CxCa-Sig for further analyses.
Figure 7Identification of apigenin as an anticancer agent for cervical cancer
Upper part: DEGs obtained from cervical cancerous v.s. normal tissues were queried using the CMap database for potential anticancer agents against cervical cancer. Lower part: Six candidate compounds were further analyzed by the STITCH database for their connectivity to CxCa-Sig.
Figure 3Pathways enrichment in cervical SCC and AC subtypes
The DEGs for SCC and AC were prepared from the data set GSE39001 (GPL201). The common and specific DEGs were virtualized with a Venn diagram. Then, biological pathway enrichment for each category was performed using the FunRich software.
Figure 4The expression of CxCa-Sig during cervical cancer progression
Clustering analysis was performed to examine the expression of CxCa-Sig during cancer progression from normal epithelium, intraepithelial neoplasm, to cervical cancer in two data sets, GSE7803 (A) and GSE63514 (B).
Figure 5The role of CxCa-Sig in clinical outcomes of cervical cancer patient
The expression of CxCa-Sig in cervical cancer patients containing responders and non-responders to neoadjuvant chemotherapy using nedaplatin and irinotecan before the surgery (A), and chemoradiotherapy using cisplatin with or without surgery (B) was analyzed by GSEA.
Figure 6Effects of IFNγ on the expression of CxCa-Sig in HeLa cells
(A) Clustering analysis was performed to examine the expression of CxCa-Sig in HeLa and SiHa cells compared to normal cervix. (B) The microarray data of IFNγ-treated HeLa cells were analyzed by GSEA for the expression of CxCa-Sig.
Summary of predicted CMap drugs
| Drug name | Pharmacologic action | Average mean score |
|---|---|---|
| Apigenin | A natural product belonging to the flavone class that is the aglycone of several naturally occurring glycosides | −0.771 |
| Thioguanosine | A purine analog showing antineoplastic activity | −0.757 |
| Sulconazole | An antifungal medication of the imidazole class | −0.706 |
| Medrysone | A corticosteroid that has been used in optometry, and in ophthalmology for the treatment of eye inflammations | −0.684 |
| Trifluoperazine | A typical antipsychotic of the phenothiazine chemical class | −0.5 |
| Tanespimycin | Heat shock protein 90 (HSP90) inhibitor | −0.418 |
Each profile of differential expressed genes (DEGs) from 7 cohorts of cervical cancer microarray data sets were used to query the CMap. Only the results of CMap drugs with enrichment score < 0 and p value < 0.01 were considered significant. The predicted CMap drugs overlapped in these data sets were listed in this table and ranked according their average mean scores. The more negative in average mean score means the higher possibility of CMap drugs to reverse the DEGs.
Figure 8The combinational anticancer activity of apigenin and IFNγ
(A, B) HeLa and SiHa cells were treated with different doses of apigenin and IFNγ (alone or in combinations) for 72 h. In left parts, the cell viability was analyzed by an MTT assay. In right parts, the combination index (CI) was calculated as described in the Materials and Methods, and then plotted against the values of fraction affected (Fa). The CI values higher than 2 were not shown in Fa-CI plot. (C) HeLa and SiHa cells were treated with 100 ng/mL IFNγ for 72 h with or without 10 μM apigenin, and then cell cycle distribution was examined by flow cytometry.