Literature DB >> 11240740

Are adenocarcinomas and adenosquamous carcinomas different from squamous carcinomas in stage IB and II cervical cancer patients undergoing primary radical surgery?

C.-H. Lai1, S. Hsueh, J.-H. Hong, T.-C. Chang, C.-J. Tseng, H.-H. Chou, K.-G. Huang, J.-D. Lin.   

Abstract

The aim of this study was to define clinicopathologic features and to investigate prognostic factors in early-stage cervical adenocarcinomas and adenosquamous carcinomas in patients undergoing primary radical surgery. One hundred thirty-four patients with stage IB or II cervical adenocarcinoma or adenosquamous carcinomas treated at a single institution were reviewed and compared to squamous carcinomas (N = 757) treated in the same period. Among adeno-adenosquamous carcinomas, stage II disease, parametrial extension, and deep cervical stromal invasion (>2/3) were associated with increased risk of pelvic lymph node metastases, while only clinical stage II, DNA index >1.3 (by flow cytometry), and pelvic node metastases were significantly associated with decreased survival by multivariate analyses. The five-year recurrence-free and overall survival rates of patients with adeno-adenosquamous vs squamous carcinoma were 72.2% vs 81.2% (P = 0.0109), and 74.1% vs 82.8% (P = 0.0136), respectively by Mantel-Cox test. After controlling confounding factors, histologic type (adeno-adenosquamous vs squamous) was confirmed as an independent prognostic factor for recurrence-free survival [relative risk (RR): 1.2792; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.0628-1.5399, P = 0.0092) and overall survival (RR: 1.2594, 95% CI: 1.0467-1.5155, P = 0.0146) in the whole series (N = 891). Although pattern of relapse by histologic type was not significantly different, patients with recurrent adeno-adenosquamous carcinoma did significantly worse than those with recurrent squamous carcinoma. In conclusion, the prognosis of adeno-adenosquamous carcinoma of the cervix is slightly worse than squamous tumors. Since salvage of recurrent adeno-adenosquamous carcinoma after primary radical surgery is generally ineffective using conventional treatment, innovative strategies are necessary for the high-risk group after primary surgery and all recurrent adeno-adenosquamous carcinomas regardless of size or site.

Entities:  

Year:  1999        PMID: 11240740     DOI: 10.1046/j.1525-1438.1999.09895.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Gynecol Cancer        ISSN: 1048-891X            Impact factor:   3.437


  19 in total

1.  Outcomes after radical hysterectomy in patients with early-stage adenocarcinoma of uterine cervix.

Authors:  J-Y Park; D-Y Kim; J-H Kim; Y-M Kim; Y-T Kim; J-H Nam
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2010-06-08       Impact factor: 7.640

2.  Long-term Outcomes of Cervical Adenocarcinoma Treated With Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy Using Paclitaxel and Cisplatin.

Authors:  Yoshihisa Arakaki; Takuro Ariga; Joichi Heianna; Yuko Shimoji; Tadaharu Nakasone; Yusuke Taira; Tomoko Nakamoto; Takuma Ooyama; Wataru Kudaka; Itomi Kaneshima; Kumiko Nishihira; Keiko Mekaru; Yoichi Aoki
Journal:  In Vivo       Date:  2020 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.155

3.  (18)F-FDG PET in stage IB/IIB cervical adenocarcinoma/adenosquamous carcinoma.

Authors:  Hung-Hsueh Chou; Hsiu-Ping Chang; Chyong-Huey Lai; Koon-Kwan Ng; Swei Hsueh; Tzu-I Wu; Ming-Yu Chen; Tzu-Chen Yen; Ji-Hong Hong; Ting-Chang Chang
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2010-01-13       Impact factor: 9.236

Review 4.  Primary surgery versus primary radiotherapy with or without chemotherapy for early adenocarcinoma of the uterine cervix.

Authors:  Astrid Baalbergen; Yerney Veenstra; Lukas Stalpers
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2013-01-31

5.  Young Cervical Cancer Patients May Be More Responsive than Older Patients to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Followed by Radical Surgery.

Authors:  Jin Zhou; Xiong Li; Kecheng Huang; Yao Jia; Fangxu Tang; Haiying Sun; Yuan Zhang; Qinghua Zhang; Ding Ma; Shuang Li
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-02-22       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Multivariate prognostic analysis of adenocarcinoma of the uterine cervix treated with radical hysterectomy and systematic lymphadenectomy.

Authors:  Tatsuya Kato; Hidemichi Watari; Mahito Takeda; Masayoshi Hosaka; Takashi Mitamura; Noriko Kobayashi; Satoko Sudo; Masanori Kaneuchi; Masataka Kudo; Noriaki Sakuragi
Journal:  J Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2013-07-04       Impact factor: 4.401

7.  Epidemiology of Cervical Adenocarcinoma and Squamous Cell Carcinoma Among Women Living With Human Immunodeficiency Virus Compared With the General Population in the United States.

Authors:  Anne F Rositch; Kimberly Levinson; Gita Suneja; Analise Monterosso; Maria J Schymura; Timothy S McNeel; Marie-Josephe Horner; Eric Engels; Meredith S Shiels
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2022-03-09       Impact factor: 20.999

8.  Beyond Sedlis-A novel histology-specific nomogram for predicting cervical cancer recurrence risk: An NRG/GOG ancillary analysis.

Authors:  Kimberly Levinson; Anna L Beavis; Christopher Purdy; Anne F Rositch; Akila Viswanathan; Aaron H Wolfson; Michael G Kelly; Krishnansu S Tewari; Leah McNally; Saketh R Guntupalli; Omar Ragab; Yi-Chun Lee; David S Miller; Warner K Huh; Kelly J Wilkinson; Nicola M Spirtos; Linda Van Le; Yovanni Casablanca; Laura L Holman; Steven E Waggoner; Amanda N Fader
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2021-07-01       Impact factor: 5.304

9.  Incidence and survival rate of women with cervical cancer in the Greater Amsterdam area.

Authors:  S Bulk; O Visser; L Rozendaal; R H M Verheijen; C J L M Meijer
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2003-09-01       Impact factor: 7.640

10.  Endothelial cell-derived interleukin-6 regulates tumor growth.

Authors:  Kathleen G Neiva; Kristy A Warner; Marcia S Campos; Zhaocheng Zhang; Juliana Moren; Theodora E Danciu; Jacques E Nör
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2014-02-17       Impact factor: 4.430

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.