Literature DB >> 28526128

Is There Really an Evolved Capacity for Number?

Rafael E Núñez1.   

Abstract

Humans and other species have biologically endowed abilities for discriminating quantities. A widely accepted view sees such abilities as an evolved capacity specific for number and arithmetic. This view, however, is based on an implicit teleological rationale, builds on inaccurate conceptions of biological evolution, downplays human data from non-industrialized cultures, overinterprets results from trained animals, and is enabled by loose terminology that facilitates teleological argumentation. A distinction between quantical (e.g., quantity discrimination) and numerical (exact, symbolic) cognition is needed: quantical cognition provides biologically evolved preconditions for numerical cognition but it does not scale up to number and arithmetic, which require cultural mediation. The argument has implications for debates about the origins of other special capacities - geometry, music, art, and language.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  culture; evolution; nativism; number; numerical cognition; symbol

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28526128     DOI: 10.1016/j.tics.2017.03.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci        ISSN: 1364-6613            Impact factor:   20.229


  24 in total

1.  How did Neanderthals and other ancient humans learn to count?

Authors:  Colin Barras
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2021-06       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Symbolic representation of numerosity by honeybees ( Apis mellifera): matching characters to small quantities.

Authors:  Scarlett R Howard; Aurore Avarguès-Weber; Jair E Garcia; Andrew D Greentree; Adrian G Dyer
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2019-06-05       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Shared and distinct neural circuitry for nonsymbolic and symbolic double-digit addition.

Authors:  Stephanie Bugden; Marty G Woldorff; Elizabeth M Brannon
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2018-12-12       Impact factor: 5.038

4.  Honeybees use absolute rather than relative numerosity in number discrimination.

Authors:  Maria Bortot; Christian Agrillo; Aurore Avarguès-Weber; Angelo Bisazza; Maria Elena Miletto Petrazzini; Martin Giurfa
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2019-06-19       Impact factor: 3.703

5.  Shared Numerosity Representations Across Formats and Tasks Revealed with 7 Tesla fMRI: Decoding, Generalization, and Individual Differences in Behavior.

Authors:  Eric D Wilkey; Benjamin N Conrad; Darren J Yeo; Gavin R Price
Journal:  Cereb Cortex Commun       Date:  2020-07-30

6.  Numerals do not need numerosities: robust evidence for distinct numerical representations for symbolic and non-symbolic numbers.

Authors:  Mila Marinova; Delphine Sasanguie; Bert Reynvoet
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2020-01-18

7.  The history of number words in the world's languages-what have we learnt so far?

Authors:  Andreea S Calude
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2021-03-22       Impact factor: 6.237

8.  The impact of musical training in symbolic and non-symbolic audiovisual judgements of magnitude.

Authors:  Nikos Chalas; Alexandros Karagiorgis; Panagiotis Bamidis; Evangelos Paraskevopoulos
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-05-05       Impact factor: 3.752

Review 9.  An emergentist perspective on the origin of number sense.

Authors:  Marco Zorzi; Alberto Testolin
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2017-02-19       Impact factor: 6.237

10.  The cultural origins of symbolic number.

Authors:  David M O'Shaughnessy; Edward Gibson; Steven T Piantadosi
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2021-06-17       Impact factor: 8.934

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.