Yixiang Zhang1, Yeqing Yuan1, Pei Liang2, Zhaoxia Zhang3, Xiaojing Guo4, Ligang Xia5, Yingying Zhao6, Xing-Sheng Shu7, Shengkun Sun8, Ying Ying6, Yingduan Cheng1. 1. Department of Urology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Jinan University, Shenzhen People's Hospital, Shenzhen, Guangdong, People's Republic of China. 2. Department of Urology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA. 3. Department of Pediatrics, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Jinan University, Shenzhen People's Hospital, Shenzhen, Guangdong, People's Republic of China. 4. Department of Pathology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Jinan University, Shenzhen People's Hospital, Shenzhen, Guangdong, People's Republic of China. 5. Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Jinan University, Shenzhen People's Hospital, Shenzhen, Guangdong, People's Republic of China. 6. Department of Physiology, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Shenzhen University Health Sciences Center, Shenzhen, Guangdong, People's Republic of China. 7. Institute of Molecular Medicine, Health Science Center, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen, Guangdong, People's Republic of China. 8. Department of Urology, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China.
Abstract
Prostate cancer (PCa) is the second leading cause of death from cancer in men. The mechanism underlying tumorigenesis and development of PCa is largely unknown. Here, we identified Kinesin family member 14 (KIF14) as a novel candidate oncogene in PCa. We found that KIF14 was overexpressed in multiple PCa cell lines and primary PCa tissues. Knockdown of KIF14 in DU145 and PC3 prostate cancer cells suppressed cell proliferation, induced cell cycle arrest and apoptosis. Transcriptome analysis by RNA-sequencing demonstrated that KIF4 suppression led to transcriptional changes of genes involved in p53 and TGF-beta signaling pathway. In addition, upregulated expression of GADD45A, GADD45B, p21, PIDD and Shisa5, which contribute to growth arrest and apoptosis induction, and downregulated CCNB1 that promotes cell cycle progression were confirmed by quantitative real-time PCR after KIF4 knockdown. We further found that KIF14 protein level was positively correlated with T stage and Gleason Score. Patients with higher KIF14 expression had shorter overall survival time than those with lower KIF14 expression. Thus, our data indicate that KIF14 could act as a potential oncogene that contributes to tumor progression and poor prognosis in PCa, which may represent a novel and useful prognostic biomarker for PCa.
Prostate cancer (PCa) is the second leading cause of death from cancer in men. The mechanism underlying tumorigenesis and development of PCa is largely unknown. Here, we identified Kinesin family member 14 (KIF14) as a novel candidate oncogene in PCa. We found that KIF14 was overexpressed in multiple PCa cell lines and primary PCa tissues. Knockdown of KIF14 in DU145 and PC3prostate cancer cells suppressed cell proliferation, induced cell cycle arrest and apoptosis. Transcriptome analysis by RNA-sequencing demonstrated that KIF4 suppression led to transcriptional changes of genes involved in p53 and TGF-beta signaling pathway. In addition, upregulated expression of GADD45A, GADD45B, p21, PIDD and Shisa5, which contribute to growth arrest and apoptosis induction, and downregulated CCNB1 that promotes cell cycle progression were confirmed by quantitative real-time PCR after KIF4 knockdown. We further found that KIF14 protein level was positively correlated with T stage and Gleason Score. Patients with higher KIF14 expression had shorter overall survival time than those with lower KIF14 expression. Thus, our data indicate that KIF14 could act as a potential oncogene that contributes to tumor progression and poor prognosis in PCa, which may represent a novel and useful prognostic biomarker for PCa.
Entities:
Keywords:
G2 arrest; KIF14; apoptosis; proliferation; prostate cancer
Prostate cancer (PCa) is one of the most commonly diagnosed malignant tumor and the second leading cause of cancer death among men in the United States. In 2016, about 180,890 new PCa cases were diagnosed and 26,120 PCa deaths were occurred in USA [1]. About one-third of patients with organ-confined PCa fail surgical treatment and progress to aggressive or metastatic lethal disease in 10 years [2]. Thus, understanding mechanisms underlying the tumorigenesis and development of PCa is urgently needed for early diagnosis, risk stratification and selection of therapy strategies against PCa. However, despite the impressive progress in discovery of genomic alterations in PCa, novel genomic bio-markers and proteins still remain to be identified.The kinesin family proteins (KIFs) are ATP- and microtubule-associated motor proteins involved in cell division, microtubule polymer dynamics, intracellular transportation and signal transduction [3]. Kinesin family member 14 (KIF14) contains a C-terminal citron kinase binding region and an N-terminal protein regulating cytokinesis binding region [4, 5], and was found to bind to chromatin and microtubules during the formation of the bipolar spindle [4, 6]. Elevated KIF14 expression can induce rapid and error-prone mitosis, leading to aneuploidy during tumorigenesis [6]. Although the exact molecular functions of KIF14 are still under investigation, increasing evidences has implicated KIF14 as an oncogene whose overexpression has been found in multiple types of tumors, including hepatocellular carcinoma, lung cancer, breast cancer, glioma, laryngeal carcinoma and ovarian cancer, etc [6-12]. Moreover, KIF14 levels are prognostic for the outcome of hepatocellular carcinoma and ovarian cancer, where KIF14 overexpression enhances tumor growth, while its knockdown decreases tumorigenicity in vitro and in xenografts [13]. However, the expression of KIF14 and its role in prostate carcinoma has not been reported thus far.In this study, we found that KIF14 was upregulated in human PCa cell lines and primary PCa tissues. Knockdown of KIF14 in DU145 and PC3prostate cancer cells reduced cell proliferation, induced cell cycle arrest and apoptosis. Transcriptome analysis by RNA-sequencing demonstrated that KIF4 suppression led to transcriptional changes of genes involved in p53 and TGF-beta signaling pathway. In addition, gene expression of a few of cell cycle regulated proteins (GADD45A, GADD45B, p21 and CCNB1) and apoptotic proteins (PIDD and SHISA5) were confirmed by quantitative real-time PCR. We further found that KIF14 expression was significantly upregulated in primary human PCa specimens. KIF14 protein level was positively correlated with clinical stage and Gleason Score. Patients with higher KIF14 expression had shorter 5-year overall survival time than those with lower KIF14 expression. Thus, our data indicate that KIF14 overexpression contributes to prostate tumor progression and is associated with poor prognosis for PCa patients, which could be served as a novel and useful prognostic indicator for PCa.
RESULTS
KIF14 was overexpressed in PCa
Previous studies suggested that KIF14 was increased in multiple cancer including hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), lung cancer, breast cancer, glioma, laryngeal carcinoma and ovarian cancer [6-12]. However, the role of KIF14 in prostate cancer remains unknown yet. We first checked the gene expression of KIF14 in a serial PCa cell lines and normal prostate tissue and found that KIF14 was significantly upregulated in PCa cells as compared to that in normal prostate tissue (Figure 1A). We further performed a summary for KIF14 gene expression extracted from to the Oncomine database, a cancer microarray database and Integrated Data-Mining Platform [14]. A fold-change of 2 for KIF14 gene expression compared to control was required for criterion. Based on analysis on two datasets derived from samples of patients with PCa [15, 16], we determined that KIF14 is highly overexpressed in prostate carcinoma as compared with normal prostate tissues (Figure 1B). Thus, the overexpression of KIF14 in multiple PCa cell lines and primary PCa suggested that KIF14 might be a potential oncogene in PCa.
Figure 1
Expression levels of KIF14 in prostate cancer
(A) Expression levels of KIF14 in a serial of prostate cancer cell lines and normal prostate tissue. *P < 0.05, *P < 0.01. (B) Increased expression of KIF14 in studies by Varambally et al. (left) and Yu et al. (right) as obtained from the Oncomine cancer database.
Expression levels of KIF14 in prostate cancer
(A) Expression levels of KIF14 in a serial of prostate cancer cell lines and normal prostate tissue. *P < 0.05, *P < 0.01. (B) Increased expression of KIF14 in studies by Varambally et al. (left) and Yu et al. (right) as obtained from the Oncominecancer database.
Inhibition of KIF14 leads to G2 arrest and reduced proliferation in PCa cells
To explore the possible mechanism of KIF14 as an oncogene, we adopted a small interfering RNA (siRNA) approach to knockdown KIF14 and examined the effect of KIF14 on cell cycle distribution and proliferation. In the experimental set-up, cell lines of DU145 and PC3, where KIF14 was markedly upregulated as compared to normal control, were chosen for the functional study. The knockdown efficiency was first validated after 48 h transfection with siRNA. Quantitative real-time PCR analysis showed that the mRNA levels of KIF14 were reduced by 89 ± 1% (P < 0.01) and 91 ± 5% (P < 0.01) in DU145 and PC3, respectively (Figure 2A). We examined whether reduced KIF14 expression would affect prostate cancer cell growth by counting the cell numbers for three constitutive days after siRNA transfection. DU145 and PC3 cells exhibited reduced proliferation after KIF14 expression was knocked down (Figure 2B and Figure 2C). Flow cytometric analysis of propidium iodide (PI)-stained cells revealed that cells accumulated and arrested in G2 as evidenced by a significant increase in the fraction of cells in G2 in siKIF14-trasnfected DU145 and PC3 cells as compared to that in scramble control transfected cells (Figure 2D and Figure 2E), indicating that loss of KIF14 induces G2 arrest in PCa.
Figure 2
Knockdown of KIF14 inhibits cell proliferation and induce G2 arrest in DU145 and PC3 cell lines
(A) Quantitative real-time PCR analysis of knockdown efficacy of KIF14 in DU145 and PC3. *P < 0.05, *P < 0.01.(B–C) Knockdown of KIF14 resulted in G2 arrest both in DU145 and PC3 cell lines. *P < 0.05, *P < 0.01. (D–E) Loss of KIF14 inhibits cell growth in DU145 and PC3 cells. *P < 0.05, *P < 0.01.
Knockdown of KIF14 inhibits cell proliferation and induce G2 arrest in DU145 and PC3 cell lines
(A) Quantitative real-time PCR analysis of knockdown efficacy of KIF14 in DU145 and PC3. *P < 0.05, *P < 0.01.(B–C) Knockdown of KIF14 resulted in G2 arrest both in DU145 and PC3 cell lines. *P < 0.05, *P < 0.01. (D–E) Loss of KIF14 inhibits cell growth in DU145 and PC3 cells. *P < 0.05, *P < 0.01.
Knockdown of KIF14 leads to apoptosis of PCa cells
We further examined the effect of KIF14 on apoptosis. Flow cytometric analysis of Annexin V-PE/7-AAD-stained cells after 48 hours after siRNA transfection discovered that loss of KIF14 produced more apoptotic cells of DU145 and PC3 (Figure 3A–3C). Taken together, these data indicate that KIF14 overexpression is necessary for G2/M cell cycle progression, promotion of cell proliferation, and prevention of cell apoptosis, which ultimately leads to indefinite growth of prostate cancer cells.
Figure 3
Knockdown of KIF14 induces apoptosis
(A–B) Knockdown of KIF14 resulted in apoptosis both in DU145 and PC3 cell lines as determined by flow cytometric analysis of Annexin V-PE/7-AAD-stained cells. (C) Statistical results of percentage of apoptotic cells in DU145 and PC3 cell lines. *P < 0.05, *P < 0.01.
Knockdown of KIF14 induces apoptosis
(A–B) Knockdown of KIF14 resulted in apoptosis both in DU145 and PC3 cell lines as determined by flow cytometric analysis of Annexin V-PE/7-AAD-stained cells. (C) Statistical results of percentage of apoptotic cells in DU145 and PC3 cell lines. *P < 0.05, *P < 0.01.
KIF14 regulated genes involved in cell cycle and apoptosis
Our functional study suggested that KIF14 is a potential oncogene in PCa. To explore the underlying mechanism by which KIF14 exerts oncogenic function in PCa, we performed RNA-Sequencing analysis to identify genes that were differentially expressed in KIF14 knockdown DU145 cells and control DU145 cells. Genes with 2 fold changes were considered as significant (Figure 4A). Firstly, we analyzed the candidate genes by KEGG (Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes) Pathway enrichment analysis. We found that knockdown of KIF14 led to transcriptional changes of genes involved in p53, TGF-beta, Hippo and PI3K-AKT signaling pathways (Figure 4B). The involvement of these cancer related pathway indicated that KIF14 has functional role in carcinogenesis of PCa. We further confirmed the expression of potential KIF14 target gene by quantitative real-time PCR. In both DU145 and PC3 cells, knockdown of KIF14 upregulated the gene expression of GADD45A, GADD45B, p21, PIDD and Shisa5, which contribute to growth arrest and apoptosis induction, while downregulated CCNB1 that promotes cell cycle progression (Figure 4C and Figure 4D). Our data suggested that KIF14 may function as a candidate oncogene through regulating genes involved in cell cycle modulation and apoptosis, thus leading to tumor progression in PCa.
Figure 4
KIF14 downstream gene analysis
(A) Heatmap of RNA-sequencing results from KIF14 knockdown DU145 cells and control DU145 cells. (B) KEGG Pathway enrichment analysis for RNA sequencing analysis. (C–D) Confirmation of differentially expressed target genes in DU145 and PC3 cells by quantitative real-time PCR. *P < 0.05, *P < 0.01.
KIF14 downstream gene analysis
(A) Heatmap of RNA-sequencing results from KIF14 knockdown DU145 cells and control DU145 cells. (B) KEGG Pathway enrichment analysis for RNA sequencing analysis. (C–D) Confirmation of differentially expressed target genes in DU145 and PC3 cells by quantitative real-time PCR. *P < 0.05, *P < 0.01.
KIF14 was overexpressed in primary PCa and positively correlated with clinical stage in patients with PCa
Our study suggested that KIF14 was upregulated in PCa cell lines. We further investigated whether KIF14 was overexpressed in primary human PCa specimens by immunohistochemical staining. KIF14 was highly expressed in 57% (37/65) primary PCa tissues, while it was either absent or weakly expressed in another 20 BPH patients (20/25) (Table 1). Thus, KIF14 was significantly overexpressed in primary human PCa (P = 0.0017, Table 1). To further clarify the relationship between KIF14 expression and PCa progression, we investigated its expression and clinicopathological variables in 65 patients (Table 2). KIF14 expression was positively correlated with histological grade (Figure 5A). Moreover, KIF14 expression was significantly correlated with clinical stage (P = 0.0002) and Gleason score (P = 0.0041). However, no correlation was found between KIF14 expression and age and metastasis.
Table 1
Expression of KIF14 in BPH and PCa tissues
Type
Case Number
Low Expression
High Expression
P
BPH
25
20
5
0.0017
PCa
65
28
37
In 20/25 BPH specimens, KIF14 was either absent or weakly expressed. However, the PCa tissue samples (37/65) were scored strong positive or moderate positive expression. The difference was significant. (P < 0.05).
Table 2
Relationship between clinicopathological variables and KIF14 expression level in PCa patients
Classification
Number
Low expression, n
High expression, n
P
Age (year)
0.7171
< 60
8
4
4
≥ 60
57
24
33
Primary tumor
0.0002
T1∼T2
31
22
12
T3∼T4
34
6
25
Metastasis
0.1232
−
47
23
24
+
18
5
13
Gleason Score
0.0041
≤ 6
14
9
5
7
23
12
11
≥ 8
28
7
21
low expression including no(−) and weak(+) staining,
high expression including moderate (++) and strong (+++) staining.
Metastasis including lymph node and Distant metastasis.
Figure 5
IHC analysis of KIF14 in prostate cancer patient samples
(A) Representative IHC image of KIF14 in primary PCa samples. KIF14 was upregulated in patient samples and positively correlated with histological grade of primary PCa. (B) Kaplan-Meier survival curve for the correlation of KIF14 expression and 5-year overall survival of patients with PCa. Survival analysis was performed for KIF14 in a cohort of 19 low expression patients and 17 high expression patients, using a log-rank test P = 0.0056.
In 20/25 BPH specimens, KIF14 was either absent or weakly expressed. However, the PCa tissue samples (37/65) were scored strong positive or moderate positive expression. The difference was significant. (P < 0.05).low expression including no(−) and weak(+) staining,high expression including moderate (++) and strong (+++) staining.Metastasis including lymph node and Distant metastasis.
IHC analysis of KIF14 in prostate cancer patient samples
(A) Representative IHC image of KIF14 in primary PCa samples. KIF14 was upregulated in patient samples and positively correlated with histological grade of primary PCa. (B) Kaplan-Meier survival curve for the correlation of KIF14 expression and 5-year overall survival of patients with PCa. Survival analysis was performed for KIF14 in a cohort of 19 low expression patients and 17 high expression patients, using a log-rank test P = 0.0056.
Prognostic significance of KIF4 expression
Clinical Gleason Score 8–10 is a negative independent prognostic factor on the progression free survival. In the present study, whereas 36% (5/14) of patients with Gleason Score≤6 showed low KIF14 expression, 75% (21/28) of men with Gleason Score of 8–10 displayed high KIF14 expression (P = 0.0041, Table 2), indicating a positive correlation of KIF14 overexpression with poor prognosis. Moreover, Kaplan-Meier analysis demonstrated that patients with higher KIF14 expression had a significantly shorter 5-year overall survival time (Figure 5B). Thus, these data emphasize the close association between KIF14 expression and prognosis in patients with PCa.
DISCUSSION
Tumorigenesis is a complex process which contains lots of abnormal disruptions of tumor suppressor genes, oncogenes and their related signaling pathways [17-26]. PCa is one of the most common non-cutaneous malignancies among men worldwide with a peak incidence in men of ∼ 70 years [27]. Though some of the prostate cancerpatients are no need to exposure to treatment, about one-third of patients with organ-confined PCa fail surgical treatment and progress to aggressive or metastatic lethal disease in 10 years [2]. Therefore, understanding mechanisms underlying the tumorigenesis and development of PCa is needed for early diagnosis, risk assessment and selection of therapeutic strategies against PCa. In this study, we identified KIF14 as a potential candidate oncogene involved in tumor progression and poor prognosis in prostate cancer.KIF14 is a member of kinesin family proteins involved in cell division, microtubule polymer dynamics, intracellular transportation and signal transduction [3]. There is increasing evidence that KIF14 is overexpressed in multiple types of tumors, including hepatocellular carcinoma, lung cancer, breast cancer, etc [6-12], implicating its role as an potential oncogene. The upregulation of KIF14 might be caused by genomic amplification [6, 9, 12]. It was reported that in hepatocellular carcinoma, loss of KIF14 downregulates the expression of Skp2 and Cks1, leading to accumulation of p27Kip1. Downregulation of Skp2 and Cks1 also resulted in cytokinesis failure, which may inhibit tumor growth [6]. Inhibition of KIF14 inhibited the migration and induces apoptosis via inactivation of Akt kinase in HCC cells [7]. The effect of KIF14 on AKT phosphorylation was also reported in triple-negative breast cancer [9]. However, the expression of KIF14 and its role in prostate carcinoma remain unclear thus far. The present study demonstrated for the first time, to our knowledge that KIF14 is a candidate oncogene in PCa, which is upregulated in multiple cell lines of PCa and primary human PCa tissues. Remarkly, KIF14 depletion induced cell cycle arrest, reduced proliferation and apoptosis in PCa cells at least partially through upregulating GADD45A, GADD45B, p21, PIDD and Shisa5, which contribute to growth arrest and apoptosis induction, and downregulating CCNB1 that promotes cell cycle progression.GADD45 mediated G2/M checkpoint in human and murine cells [28], this effect may be due to GADD45 ability to dissociate complexes of Cyclin B1 and Cdc2 [29]. The dephosphorylation of the CDC2/CCNB complex mediated by Cdc25 allows cells entry into M phase [30, 31]. The main function of p21 in cell cycle regulation is inhibiting the activity of cyclin B/Cdk1 complexes. Thus p21 is responsible for the nuclear retention of the cyclin B/Cdk1 complex and cyclin B degradation in response to DNA damage [32]. In our study, we found CCNB was repressed, while GADD45A, GADD45B and p21 were upregulated after KIF14 inhibition. The changed expression profile of these genes could explain G2 arrest in KIF14 knockdown cells. G2 arrest will in turn lead to lower proliferation rate in cells and it could explain the inhibition of proliferation in KIF14 knockdown cells. We also found that SKP2 was downregulated in our microarray study (data not shown), which is consistent with other group's study [6]. We also found that PIDD, which interact with other death domain proteins and function as an adaptor protein in cell death-related signaling processes [33], was upregulated in KIF14 downregulated cells. PIDD is an effector of p53-induced apoptosis and it could act as switch between cell survival and cell death in response to DNA damage [33]. Shisa5 is another apoptotic protein upregulated in KIF14 knockdown cells. Shisa5 is localized to the endoplasmic reticulum and together with p53 induces apoptosis in a caspase-dependent manner [34, 35]. The upregulation of these two proteins will induce apoptosis in KIF14 knockdown cells. Our future study will be focused on how KIF14 regulates those genes’ expression.Except for KIF14, many other kinesin proteins are reported as oncoproteins [36-43]. For example, KIFC1 induces resistance to docetaxel and is associated with survival of patients with prostate cancer [36]; KIF11 is a driver of invasion, proliferation, and self-renewal in glioblastoma [37]; KIF3C promotes tumor growth and metastasis in breast cancer by regulating TGF-β signaling [38]; It is also reported that inhibition of KIF22 suppresses cancer cell proliferation by delaying mitotic exit through upregulating CDC25C expression [39]; KIF3a can promote proliferation and invasion via Wnt signaling in advanced prostate cancer [40]. All these further support our finding that KIF14 is a functional oncoprotein in prostate cancer.It has been reported that KIF14 is a marker of poor prognosis in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma and ovarian cancer, where KIF14 overexpression enhances tumor growth, while its knockdown decreases tumorigenicity in vitro and in xenografts [13]. However, the role of KIF14 as an indicator in PCa is largely unknown. Here, we found that KIF14 was upregulated in most clinical PCa tissues and cell lines. Subsequently, by immunohistochemical methods, we observed a positive correlation between KIF4 expression and histological grade, clinical stage and Gleason Score. Kaplan-Meier analysis demonstrated that KIF14 was a prognostic factor for patient survival. Our results thus indicate that KIF14 could be served as a novel and useful prognostic biomarker for PCa.In summary, our study found that KIF14 is upregulated in PCa cell lines and clinical PCa tissues. Inhibition of KIF14 suppresses cell proliferation, induces G2 arrest and apoptosis. This effect was mainly caused by regulating GADD45A, GADD45B, CCNB, p21, PIDD and SHISA5 expression. Moreover, the protein level of KIF14 is positively correlated with histological grade, clinical tumor stage and poor prognosis in patients with PCa. Thus, our results suggest that KIF14 could act as a candidate oncogene that contributes to tumor progression and poor prognosis in PCa. KIF14 may represent a novel molecular target for the treatment of PCa.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Cell culture and transfection
, DU145 and PC3) were used for this study. All cells were purchased from ATCC. Cells were maintained in RPMI 1640 medium (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA) containing 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS), 1% penicillin–streptomycin (10 ng/ml penicillin and 10 U/ml streptomycin), and 2.5 mM glutamine at 37°C in a humidified 5% CO2 incubator [44]. KIF14-short interfering RNA (siKIF14, Santa Cruz biotechnology, catalog no: sc-60882) and control siRNA (siControl, Santa Cruz biotechnology, catalog no: sc-37007) were purchased from Santa Cruz Biotechnology (Dallas, TX, USA). Transfection was carried out according to the manufacturer's instruction using RNAiMAX transfection reagent (Invitrogen, Eugene, OR, USA, catalog no: 13778).
RNA extraction, reverse transcription and quantitative realtime PCR
RNA was extracted with Trizol reagent according to manufacturer's protocol (Invitrogen, Eugene, OR, USA). One normal prostate RNA was purchased from Clontech (Clontech, Palo Alto, CA). Reverse transcription was performed with Random hexamers and SuperScript-III (Invitrogen, Eugene, OR, USA). Quantitative real-time PCR was carried out with the Applied Biosystems 7300 real-time systems using real-time PCR Master Mix (SYBR Green). The standard curve was used to establish amplification efficiency [45]. All primers used are listed in Table 3. Each experiment was performed in triplicate in three independent experiments.
Table 3
Primer list used in this study
Application
Primer name
Sequence (5′→3′)
Size (bp)
Realtime PCR
KIF14F
TTCAGAACACCTCTGCAGGA
128 bp
KIF14R
ACTCATGAAGACTACCTGGG
GAPDHF
TCATTGACCTCAACTACATG
131 bp
GAPDHR
TCGCTCCTGGAAGATGGTGAT
P21F
AGACCAGCATGACAGATTTC
140 bp
P21R
ACTGAGACTAAGGCAGAAGA
CCNBF
CCTCCGGTGTTCTGCTTCTC
122 bp
CCNBR
GCCTGCCATGTTGATCTTCG
GADD45AF
CTTGGAGACCGACGCTGG
149 bp
GADD45AR
TGTAGCGACTTTCCCGGC
GADD45BF
ATCAACATCGTGCGGGTGT
122 bp
GADD45BR
GTGTGAGGGTTCGTGACCAG
PIDD1F
TGTTCGAGGGCGAAGAGTTC
148 bp
PIDD1R
TCCAGAGTGGTGGTCACGTA
SHISAF
GAAAGGTGTGCTGTGCCTGA
105 bp
SHISAR
TGACATGGGGTCGTTGTAGC
Growth curve
DU145 or PC3 cells were seeded in six-well plates at an appropriate density with penicillin/streptomycin free medium. Cells were transfected with control siRNA or siKIF14, respectively. After transfection, cell numbers were counted every 24 hours including the start point. Each experiment was conducted in triplicate in three independent experiments.
Flow cytometry analysis of cell cycle
About 48 hours after transfection, cells were harvested and fixed with ice-cold 70% ethanol for 24 hours. After that, cells were washed with PBS once and stained with 100 μl of 50 mg/L propidium iodide (PI) for 15 min at 4°C in dark. The cell cycle profiles were assayed by flow cytometry (excitation at 536 nm and emission at 617 nm) with a flow cytometer (FACS CaliburTM, BD Biosciences, CA, USA) and data were analyzed with the ModFit LT software. Each experiment was conducted in triplicate in three independent experiments.
Apoptosis assay
Apoptosis was assessed by flow cytometry analysis. Apoptotic cells were detected with PE Annexin V Apoptosis Detection Kit I (BD Bioscience). About 48 hours after transfection, cells were harvested and centrifuged at 1000 rpm for 10 min, rinsed with cold PBS once. About 1 × 105 cells were stained with 5 μl PE Annexin V and 5 μl 7-AAD working solution for 15 min at room temperature in dark. The ratio of apoptotic cells were analyzed by flow cytometry. The total number of early apoptotic cells and late apoptotic cells were considered as total apoptotic cells. Each experiment was conducted in triplicate in three independent experiments.
RNA sequencing
RNA was extracted with an RNeasy Mini kit (QIAGEN). Firstly, mRNA was purified and RNA-Sequencing library preparation was performed according to the manual of manufacturers (KAPA biosystems). Sequencing reactions were performed with the Illumina HiSeq platform. RNA-seq reads were mapped to the human genome (hg19) using Burrows-Wheeler Aligner (bwa). The duplicate reads were then marked by picard. The HTseq tool was used to calculate the reads count for each gene. Finally, we used the Reads Per Kilobase per Million mapped reads (rpkm) command in edgeR package to calculate the rpkm of each gene. Specifically, we added one to the reads count for each gene and take log values. These log values were inputted into the heatmap.2 in R package gplots to generate the heatmap figure [46]. The genes with 2 fold changes were loaded to David bioinformatics database (https://david.ncifcrf.gov/) for pathway analysis.
Oncomine analysis
The Oncominecancer microarray database (http://www.oncomine.com) [14] was used to analyze expression profiles of KIF14 in a variety of humanprostate cancer and normal tissues. Two representative prostate cancer datasets [15, 16] were presented in this study. A fold-change of 2 for KIF14 gene expression compared to control was required for criterion.
Patient samples and IHC
All patient samples were collected in Shenzhen People's Hospital with the permission of patients. All PCa and benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) specimens were obtained immediately after operation (radical prostatectomy, transrectal biopsy or transurethral resection of the prostate). Tissues were then fixed in 10 % buffered formalin and embedded in paraffin. Tissue sections were stained with KLF14 antibody purchased from abcam. The protocol of IHC staining was described before [47]. The clinical characteristics of the PCa cohort are listed in Table 2. The tumor staging and differentiation of PCa was defined according to the 2010 AJCC Cancer Staging Manual seventh edition. (Well differentiation: Gleason Score ≤ 6) Moderate differentiation: Gleason Score = 7; Poor differentiation: Gleason Score ≥ 8)
Follow-up
All patients with PCa received check-ups every 2–3 months during the first 2 years and every 3–6 months there after until the follow-up period ended in January 2017. Surgeons who were blinded to the study performed the follow-up study. The overall survival was defined as the length of time between surgery and either the death of the patient or the last follow-up visit.
Statistical analysis
Data are presented as mean ± standard deviation. Statistical assessments were carried out using Student's t test. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
Authors: Zun Liu; Ryan E Rebowe; Zemin Wang; Yingchun Li; Zehua Wang; John S DePaolo; Jianhui Guo; Chiping Qian; Wanguo Liu Journal: Mol Cancer Res Date: 2014-01-10 Impact factor: 5.852
Authors: Yingduan Cheng; Hua Geng; Suk Hang Cheng; Pei Liang; Yan Bai; Jisheng Li; Gopesh Srivastava; Margaret H L Ng; Tatsuo Fukagawa; Xiushan Wu; Anthony T C Chan; Qian Tao Journal: Cancer Res Date: 2010-08-03 Impact factor: 12.701
Authors: X W Wang; Q Zhan; J D Coursen; M A Khan; H U Kontny; L Yu; M C Hollander; P M O'Connor; A J Fornace; C C Harris Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 1999-03-30 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Sooryanarayana Varambally; Jianjun Yu; Bharathi Laxman; Daniel R Rhodes; Rohit Mehra; Scott A Tomlins; Rajal B Shah; Uma Chandran; Federico A Monzon; Michael J Becich; John T Wei; Kenneth J Pienta; Debashis Ghosh; Mark A Rubin; Arul M Chinnaiyan Journal: Cancer Cell Date: 2005-11 Impact factor: 31.743
Authors: Timothy W Corson; Chang Qi Zhu; Suzanne K Lau; Frances A Shepherd; Ming-Sound Tsao; Brenda L Gallie Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2007-06-01 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Daniel Ortega-Bernal; Claudia H González-De La Rosa; Elena Arechaga-Ocampo; Miguel Angel Alvarez-Avitia; Nora Sobrevilla Moreno; Claudia Rangel-Escareño Journal: Oncol Lett Date: 2018-05-31 Impact factor: 2.967
Authors: Guido Frumento; Jianmin Zuo; Kriti Verma; Wayne Croft; Pradeep Ramagiri; Frederick E Chen; Paul Moss Journal: Front Immunol Date: 2019-03-15 Impact factor: 7.561
Authors: Kamakshi Sishtla; Natalie Pitt; Mehdi Shadmand; Michael N O'Hare; Rania S Sulaiman; Anthony L Sinn; Keith Condon; Karen E Pollok; George E Sandusky; Timothy W Corson Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2018-11-01 Impact factor: 4.379