Literature DB >> 28523340

Patient and surgical characteristics that affect revision risk in dynamic intraligamentary stabilization of the anterior cruciate ligament.

Philipp Henle1, Kathrin S Bieri2, Manuel Brand3, Emin Aghayev4, Jessica Bettfuehr5, Janosch Haeberli1, Martina Kess1, Stefan Eggli1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Failure of dynamic intraligamentary stabilization (DIS) that requires revision surgery of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) has not been studied. The aim of this study was to investigate the incidence of revision ACL surgery, and the patient characteristics and surgery-related factors that are associated with an increased risk of ACL revision after DIS.
METHODS: This study analysed a prospective, consecutively documented single-centre case series using standardized case report forms over a 2.5-year follow-up period. The primary endpoint was revision ACL surgery. We used Kaplan-Meier analysis to examine the revision-free survival time, and a multiple logistic regression model of potential risk factors including age, sex, BMI, smoking status, previous contralateral ACL injury, Tegner activity score, interval to surgery, rupture pattern, hardware removal, and postoperative side-to-side difference in knee laxity. Relative risk was calculated for subgroups of significant risk factors.
RESULTS: In total, 381 patients (195 male) with a mean age of 33 ± 12 years were included in the analysis. The incidence of revision ACL surgery was 30/381 (7.9%). Younger age (p = 0.001), higher Tegner activity score (p = 0.003), and increased knee laxity (p = 0.015) were significantly associated with revision ACL surgery. The increased relative risk for patients who were less than 24 years old, participated in activities at a Tegner level >5 points, or had >2 mm of side-to-side difference in knee laxity was 1.6, 3.7, and 2.3, respectively.
CONCLUSION: Young age, high level of sport activity, and high knee laxity observed in follow-up examinations increased the likelihood for revision surgery after DIS. Patients undergoing DIS should be informed of their potentially increased risk for therapy failure and carefully monitored during recovery. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Case series, Level IV.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ACL repair; ACL suture; Anterior cruciate ligament; Dynamic intraligamentary stabilization; Failure; Ligamys; Outcomes; Revision surgery; Risk factors

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28523340     DOI: 10.1007/s00167-017-4574-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc        ISSN: 0942-2056            Impact factor:   4.342


  32 in total

1.  Analysis of subjective, objective and functional examination tests after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. A follow-up of 527 patients.

Authors:  N Sernert; J Kartus; K Köhler; S Stener; J Larsson; B I Eriksson; J Karlsson
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 2.  Objective criteria for return to athletics after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction and subsequent reinjury rates: a systematic review.

Authors:  Sue D Barber-Westin; Frank R Noyes
Journal:  Phys Sportsmed       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 2.241

Review 3.  Comparison of Graft Failure Rate Between Autografts Placed via an Anatomic Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Technique: A Systematic Review, Meta-analysis, and Meta-regression.

Authors:  Conrad M Gabler; Cale A Jacobs; Jennifer Sebert Howard; Carl G Mattacola; Darren L Johnson
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2015-05-21       Impact factor: 6.202

4.  Analyzing and interpreting data from likert-type scales.

Authors:  Gail M Sullivan; Anthony R Artino
Journal:  J Grad Med Educ       Date:  2013-12

5.  Incidence and risk factors for graft rupture and contralateral rupture after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  Lucy Salmon; Vivianne Russell; Tim Musgrove; Leo Pinczewski; Kathryn Refshauge
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 4.772

6.  Rating systems in the evaluation of knee ligament injuries.

Authors:  Y Tegner; J Lysholm
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1985-09       Impact factor: 4.176

7.  Analysis of return to competition and repeat rupture for 298 anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions with patellar or hamstring tendon autograft in sportspeople.

Authors:  E Laboute; L Savalli; P Puig; P Trouve; G Sabot; G Monnier; B Dubroca
Journal:  Ann Phys Rehabil Med       Date:  2010-11-10

Review 8.  Anterior cruciate ligament injury: diagnosis, management, and prevention.

Authors:  Francesca Cimino; Bradford Scott Volk; Don Setter
Journal:  Am Fam Physician       Date:  2010-10-15       Impact factor: 3.292

Review 9.  Outcomes and Risk Factors of Rerevision Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Daniel J Liechti; Jorge Chahla; Chase S Dean; Justin J Mitchell; Erik Slette; Travis J Menge; Robert F LaPrade
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2016-06-09       Impact factor: 4.772

10.  Dynamic intraligamentary stabilization: novel technique for preserving the ruptured ACL.

Authors:  S Eggli; H Kohlhof; M Zumstein; P Henle; M Hartel; D S Evangelopoulos; H Bonel; S Kohl
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2014-03-21       Impact factor: 4.342

View more
  10 in total

1.  Surgeon experience with dynamic intraligamentary stabilization does not influence risk of failure.

Authors:  Philipp Henle; Kathrin S Bieri; Janosch Haeberli; Nele Arnout; Jan Victor; Mirco Herbort; Clemens Koesters; Stefan Eggli
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2018-02-05       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  ACL suturing using dynamic intraligamentary stabilisation showing good clinical outcome but a high reoperation rate: a retrospective independent study.

Authors:  Martin Meister; Jonathan Koch; Felix Amsler; Markus P Arnold; Michael T Hirschmann
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2017-09-22       Impact factor: 4.342

3.  Return to Sports: A Risky Business? A Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis of Risk Factors for Graft Rupture Following ACL Reconstruction.

Authors:  Anna Cronström; Eva Tengman; Charlotte K Häger
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2022-08-24       Impact factor: 11.928

4.  Primary stability of single-stage revision reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament in case of failure of dynamic intraligamentary stabilization depends on implant position during ACL repair.

Authors:  B Schliemann; C Kösters; J Glasbrenner; M Fischer; M J Raschke; T Briese; M Müller; E Herbst; C Kittl
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2021-07-31       Impact factor: 2.928

5.  Arthroscopic primary repair of proximal anterior cruciate ligament tears seems safe but higher level of evidence is needed: a systematic review and meta-analysis of recent literature.

Authors:  Jelle P van der List; Harmen D Vermeijden; Inger N Sierevelt; Gregory S DiFelice; Arthur van Noort; Gino M M J Kerkhoffs
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2019-09-05       Impact factor: 4.342

6.  Anterior cruciate ligament repair using dynamic intraligamentary stabilization provides a similarly successful outcome as all-inside anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with a faster psychological recovery in moderately active patients.

Authors:  M Enes Kayaalp; Serkan Sürücü; Mehmet Halis Çerçi; Mahmut Aydın; Mahir Mahiroğulları
Journal:  Jt Dis Relat Surg       Date:  2022-07-06

7.  Occurrence of inadequate ACL healing after Dynamic Intraligamentary Stabilization and functional outcome-a multicentre case series.

Authors:  Monika Senftl; Daniel Petek; Matthias Jacobi; Alex Schallberger; Jonathan Spycher; Anna Stock; Rolf Hess; Moritz Tannast
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2021-08-24

8.  Comparable Instrumented Knee Joint Laxity and Patient-Reported Outcomes After ACL Repair With Dynamic Intraligamentary Stabilization or ACL Reconstruction: 5-Year Results of a Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Johannes Glasbrenner; Michael J Raschke; Christoph Kittl; Elmar Herbst; Christian Peez; Thorben Briese; Philipp A Michel; Mirco Herbort; Clemens Kösters; Benedikt Schliemann
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2022-08-25       Impact factor: 7.010

Review 9.  Anterior cruciate ligament repair - past, present and future.

Authors:  Piyush Mahapatra; Saman Horriat; Bobby S Anand
Journal:  J Exp Orthop       Date:  2018-06-15

10.  Risk Factors for Revision Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction and Frequency With Which Patients Change Surgeons.

Authors:  Kirsty Sutherland; Mark Clatworthy; Kevin Chang; Richard Rahardja; Simon W Young
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2019-11-21
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.