Literature DB >> 28523138

Tips and tricks of the propensity score methods in the thoracic surgery research.

Luca Bertolaccini1, Alessandro Pardolesi2, Piergiorgio Solli1,2.   

Abstract

Without randomization, the differences in the distribution of baseline covariates can confound the evaluation of outcomes between the groups. To estimate the causal effects of treatment on the results randomized clinical trials (RCT) are routinely used. When RCT are not feasible for cost, time, and ethical issues, the effect of treatment on an inevitable outcome could be investigated by using a non-experimental study design. The propensity score (PS) refers to the individual probability, for a subject involved in a study, of receiving a new treatment rather than the control treatment. PS matching is a valuable and increasingly popular tool for dealing with observational data and non-random treatment assignment. Nevertheless, surgeons need to proceed with caution and apply PS methods appropriately.

Keywords:  Lung cancer; biostatistics; propensity score analysis; statistics; video assisted thoracic surgery

Year:  2017        PMID: 28523138      PMCID: PMC5418252          DOI: 10.21037/jtd.2017.03.60

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Thorac Dis        ISSN: 2072-1439            Impact factor:   2.895


  11 in total

Review 1.  Causal effects in clinical and epidemiological studies via potential outcomes: concepts and analytical approaches.

Authors:  R J Little; D B Rubin
Journal:  Annu Rev Public Health       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 21.981

Review 2.  A review of the application of propensity score methods yielded increasing use, advantages in specific settings, but not substantially different estimates compared with conventional multivariable methods.

Authors:  Til Stürmer; Manisha Joshi; Robert J Glynn; Jerry Avorn; Kenneth J Rothman; Sebastian Schneeweiss
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2005-10-13       Impact factor: 6.437

Review 3.  Propensity-score matching in the cardiovascular surgery literature from 2004 to 2006: a systematic review and suggestions for improvement.

Authors:  Peter C Austin
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 5.209

Review 4.  Propensity scores: Methods, considerations, and applications in the Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery.

Authors:  Timothy L McMurry; Yinin Hu; Eugene H Blackstone; Benjamin D Kozower
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2015-04-02       Impact factor: 5.209

5.  Propensity Score Methods in Nursing Research: Take Advantage of Them but Proceed With Caution.

Authors:  Wei Pan; Haiyan Bai
Journal:  Nurs Res       Date:  2016 Nov/Dec       Impact factor: 2.381

6.  Methodological comparison of marginal structural model, time-varying Cox regression, and propensity score methods: the example of antidepressant use and the risk of hip fracture.

Authors:  M Sanni Ali; Rolf H H Groenwold; Svetlana V Belitser; Patrick C Souverein; Elisa Martín; Nicolle M Gatto; Consuelo Huerta; Helga Gardarsdottir; Kit C B Roes; Arno W Hoes; Antonius de Boer; Olaf H Klungel
Journal:  Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 2.890

7.  Best (but oft-forgotten) practices: propensity score methods in clinical nutrition research.

Authors:  M Sanni Ali; Rolf Hh Groenwold; Olaf H Klungel
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  2016-07-13       Impact factor: 7.045

8.  Propensity-score analysis in thoracic surgery: When, why, and an introduction to how.

Authors:  Daniel G Winger; Katie S Nason
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2016-02-24       Impact factor: 5.209

9.  Propensity Score-Based Methods versus MTE-Based Methods in Causal Inference: Identification, Estimation, and Application.

Authors:  Xiang Zhou; Y U Xie
Journal:  Sociol Methods Res       Date:  2014-11-03

Review 10.  Comparison of Propensity Score Methods and Covariate Adjustment: Evaluation in 4 Cardiovascular Studies.

Authors:  Markus C Elze; John Gregson; Usman Baber; Elizabeth Williamson; Samantha Sartori; Roxana Mehran; Melissa Nichols; Gregg W Stone; Stuart J Pocock
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2017-01-24       Impact factor: 24.094

View more
  1 in total

1.  Sugammadex affects emergence agitation in children undergoing strabismus surgery.

Authors:  Young Sung Kim; Jae Ryung Cha; Yoon Sook Lee; Woon Young Kim; Jae Hwan Kim; Yun Hee Kim
Journal:  J Int Med Res       Date:  2018-07-01       Impact factor: 1.671

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.