Morten Fenger-Grøn1, Kim Overvad2, Anne Tjønneland3, Lars Frost4. 1. Research Unit for General Practice and Section for General Medical Practice, Department of Public Health, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark. Electronic address: mfgr@ph.au.dk. 2. Section for Epidemiology, Department of Public Health, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark; Department of Cardiology, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark. 3. Danish Cancer Society Research Center, Copenhagen, Denmark. 4. Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Silkeborg Hospital, Denmark.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Obesity is repeatedly emphasized as a risk factor for atrial fibrillation or flutter (AF). However, the underlying evidence may be questioned, as the obvious correlations between various anthropometric measures hamper identification of the characteristics that are biologically driving AF risk, and recent studies suggest that fat carries limited or no independent risk of AF. OBJECTIVES: This study sought to assess mutually adjusted associations among AF risk and height, weight, body mass index, hip and waist circumference, waist-to-hip ratio, and bioelectrical impedance-derived measures of fat mass, lean body mass, and fat percentage. METHODS: Anthropometric measures and self-reported life-style information were collected from 1993 to 1997 in a population-based cohort including 55,273 persons age 50 to 64 years who were followed in Danish registers until June 2013. RESULTS: During a median of 17 years of follow-up, 3,868 persons developed AF. Adjusted hazard ratios per population SD difference (HRs) showed highly statistically significant, positive associations for all 9 anthropometric measures (HRs ranging from 1.08 [95% confidence interval (CI): 1.05 to 1.12] for waist-to-hip ratio to 1.37 [95% CI: 1.33 to 1.42] for lean body mass). Pairwise mutual adjustment of the 9 measures left the association for lean body mass virtually unchanged (lowest HR: 1.33 [95% CI: 1.28 to 1.39] when adjusting for height), whereas no other association remained substantial when adjusted for lean body mass (highest HR: 1.05 [95% CI: 1.01 to 1.10] for height). CONCLUSIONS: Lean body mass was the predominant anthropometric risk factor for AF, whereas no association was observed for either of the obesity-related anthropometric measures after adjustment for lean body mass.
BACKGROUND:Obesity is repeatedly emphasized as a risk factor for atrial fibrillation or flutter (AF). However, the underlying evidence may be questioned, as the obvious correlations between various anthropometric measures hamper identification of the characteristics that are biologically driving AF risk, and recent studies suggest that fat carries limited or no independent risk of AF. OBJECTIVES: This study sought to assess mutually adjusted associations among AF risk and height, weight, body mass index, hip and waist circumference, waist-to-hip ratio, and bioelectrical impedance-derived measures of fat mass, lean body mass, and fat percentage. METHODS: Anthropometric measures and self-reported life-style information were collected from 1993 to 1997 in a population-based cohort including 55,273 persons age 50 to 64 years who were followed in Danish registers until June 2013. RESULTS: During a median of 17 years of follow-up, 3,868 persons developed AF. Adjusted hazard ratios per population SD difference (HRs) showed highly statistically significant, positive associations for all 9 anthropometric measures (HRs ranging from 1.08 [95% confidence interval (CI): 1.05 to 1.12] for waist-to-hip ratio to 1.37 [95% CI: 1.33 to 1.42] for lean body mass). Pairwise mutual adjustment of the 9 measures left the association for lean body mass virtually unchanged (lowest HR: 1.33 [95% CI: 1.28 to 1.39] when adjusting for height), whereas no other association remained substantial when adjusted for lean body mass (highest HR: 1.05 [95% CI: 1.01 to 1.10] for height). CONCLUSIONS: Lean body mass was the predominant anthropometric risk factor for AF, whereas no association was observed for either of the obesity-related anthropometric measures after adjustment for lean body mass.
Authors: J Neefs; S M Boekholdt; K-T Khaw; R Luben; R Pfister; N J Wareham; E R Meulendijks; P Sanders; J R de Groot Journal: Nutr Metab Cardiovasc Dis Date: 2019-03-15 Impact factor: 4.222
Authors: Jens Cosedis Nielsen; Yenn-Jiang Lin; Marcio Jansen de Oliveira Figueiredo; Alireza Sepehri Shamloo; Alberto Alfie; Serge Boveda; Nikolaos Dagres; Dario Di Toro; Lee L Eckhardt; Kenneth Ellenbogen; Carina Hardy; Takanori Ikeda; Aparna Jaswal; Elizabeth Kaufman; Andrew Krahn; Kengo Kusano; Valentina Kutyifa; Han S Lim; Gregory Y H Lip; Santiago Nava-Townsend; Hui-Nam Pak; Gerardo Rodríguez Diez; William Sauer; Anil Saxena; Jesper Hastrup Svendsen; Diego Vanegas; Marmar Vaseghi; Arthur Wilde; T Jared Bunch; Alfred E Buxton; Gonzalo Calvimontes; Tze-Fan Chao; Lars Eckardt; Heidi Estner; Anne M Gillis; Rodrigo Isa; Josef Kautzner; Philippe Maury; Joshua D Moss; Gi-Byung Nam; Brian Olshansky; Luis Fernando Pava Molano; Mauricio Pimentel; Mukund Prabhu; Wendy S Tzou; Philipp Sommer; Janice Swampillai; Alejandro Vidal; Thomas Deneke; Gerhard Hindricks; Christophe Leclercq Journal: Europace Date: 2020-08-01 Impact factor: 5.214
Authors: Laura C Nath; Adrian D Elliott; Joe Weir; Peter Curl; Sarah M Rosanowski; Samantha Franklin Journal: J Vet Intern Med Date: 2021-02-19 Impact factor: 3.333
Authors: Emmi Tikkanen; Stefan Gustafsson; Joshua W Knowles; Marco Perez; Stephen Burgess; Erik Ingelsson Journal: Eur Heart J Date: 2019-04-21 Impact factor: 35.855
Authors: C Fielder Camm; Ben Lacey; M Sofia Massa; Adam Von Ende; Parag Gajendragadkar; Alexander Stiby; Elsa Valdes-Marquez; Sarah Lewington; Rohan Wijesurendra; Sarah Parish; Barbara Casadei; Jemma C Hopewell Journal: Int J Epidemiol Date: 2022-06-13 Impact factor: 9.685
Authors: Susan X Zhao; Paul D Ziegler; Michael H Crawford; Calvin Kwong; Jodi L Koehler; Rod S Passman Journal: Ther Adv Neurol Disord Date: 2019-04-11 Impact factor: 6.570
Authors: James O'Neill; Katrina Bounford; Alice Anstey; Jesvita D'Silva; Lisa Clark; Sven Plein; Muzahir H Tayebjee Journal: PLoS One Date: 2019-08-23 Impact factor: 3.240