| Literature DB >> 28521773 |
Yangjing Xue1, Luyuan Tao1, Shaoze Wu1, Guoqiang Wang1, Lu Qian1, Jiwu Li1, Lianming Liao2, Jifei Tang3, Kangting Ji4.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: About 10-15% patients who take statins experience skeletal muscle problems. Red yeast rice has a good safety profile could provide a compromise therapeutic strategy. Therefore, the aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of red yeast rice, when compared to simvastatin, on the muscle fatigue symptom and the serum lipid level in dyslipidemic patients with low to moderate cardiovascular risk.Entities:
Keywords: Dyslipidemia; Lipid-lowering effects; Muscle fatigue symptom; Physical activity; Red yeast rice; Simvastatin
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28521773 PMCID: PMC5437665 DOI: 10.1186/s12872-017-0560-z
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Cardiovasc Disord ISSN: 1471-2261 Impact factor: 2.298
Fig. 1Trial flow chart
Baseline characteristics of the patientsa
| Characteristic | Simvastatin ( | Zuezhikang ( |
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Female sex, no. (%) | 15 (45.5) | 13 (48.2) | 0.835 |
| Age, yr | 46.0 ± 7.0 | 47.0 ± 5.8 | 0.614 |
| Current cigarette smoker, no. (%) | 3 (9.1) | 2 (7.4) | 1.000 |
| Arterial hypertension, no. (%) | 26 (78.8) | 16 (59.3) | 0.101 |
| Arterial blood pressure, mmHg | |||
| Systolic | 148 ± 19 | 148 ± 17 | 0.971 |
| Diastolic | 84 ± 7 | 83 ± 9 | 0.564 |
| FBG, mmol/L | 5.10 ± 0.36 | 5.33 ± 0.52 | 0.048 |
| TC, mmol/L | 5.91 ± 0.71 | 5.82 ± 0.73 | 0.488 |
| TG, mmol/L | 1.76 ± 1.00 | 1.61 ± 0.65 | 0.633 |
| LDL-C, mmol/L | 3.72 ± 0.48 | 3.74 ± 0.55 | 0.509 |
| HDL-C, mmol/L | 1.27 ± 0.25 | 1.23 ± 0.25 | 0.906 |
| ALT, U/L | 28.6 ± 10.6 | 30. 3 ± 13.3 | 0.570 |
| AST, U/L | 24.1 ± 7.0 | 25.6 ± 7.5 | 0.425 |
| CPK, U/L | 80.80 ± 24.90 | 91.7 ± 23.7 | 0.092 |
| Cr, μmol/L | 72.6 ± 14.4 | 75.6 ± 17.2 | 0.463 |
| Fatigue score | 19.6 ± 2.6 | 19.3 ± 1.9 | 0.592 |
| Physical activity level | 0.870 | ||
| Low, no. (%) | 14 (42.4) | 3 (11.1) | |
| Moderate, no. (%) | 10 (30.3) | 12 (44.4) | |
| High, no. (%) | 9 (27.3) | 12 (44.4) | |
aThe plus-minus values are the means ± the SDs. The percentages do not sum to 100 due to rounding. ALT alanine transaminase, AST aspartate transaminase, CPK creatine phosphate kinase, Cr creatinine, FBG fasting blood glucose, HDL highdensity lipoprotein-cholesterol, LDL low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol, TC total cholesterol. TG triglyceride
Fig. 2Comparison of the fatigue scores of the simvastatin and red yeast rice groups (mean ± SD). * P < .001 vs. baseline in the simvastatin group. ** P < .01 between the simvastatin and red yeast rice groups at week 4
Comparison of the physical activity levels at baseline and at week 4
| Simvastatin ( |
| Xuezhikang ( |
| |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Baseline | Week 4 | Baseline | Week 4 | |||
| Physical activity level | <.001 | 0.19 | ||||
| Low, No. (%) | 14 (42.4) | 25 (75.8) | 3 (11.1) | 3 (11.1) | ||
| Moderate, No. (%) | 10 (30.3) | 8 (24.2) | 12 (44.4) | 15 (55.6) | ||
| High, No. (%) | 9 (27.3) | 0 (0.0) | 12 (44.4) | 9 (33.3) | ||
Physical activity levels of two treatment groups at week 4
| Simvastatin ( | Red yeast rice ( |
| |
|---|---|---|---|
| Physical activity level | <.001 | ||
| Low, No. (%) | 25 (75.8) | 3 (11.1) | |
| Moderate, No. (%) | 8 (24.2) | 15 (55.6) | |
| High, No. (%) | 0 (0.0) | 9 (33.3) |
Fig. 3Comparison of the lipid-lowering efficacies of simvastatin and red yeast rice; a & b Comparison of lipid levels at week 4 and baseline in the simvastatin and red yeast rice groups (mean ± SD). No significant changes in TG or HDL levels were observed in either arm; c Comparison of the percentage changes in the lipid (TC and LDL) levels from baseline to week 4 (mean ± SD). The decrease in both the TC and LDL levels were comparable between the two groups.* TC levels, P < .001 vs. baseline in simvastatin group. ** LDL levels, P < .001 vs. baseline in simvastatin group. # TC levels, P < .001 vs. baseline in red yeast rice group. ## LDL levels, P < .001 vs. baseline in red yeast rice group
Fig. 4Comparison of the safeties at week 4 and at baseline (mean ± SD). No significant changes in ALT, AST, CPK or Cr levels were observed in either group