| Literature DB >> 28520723 |
Joseph Saragusty1, Alemayehu Lemma2, Thomas Bernd Hildebrandt1, Frank Göritz1.
Abstract
In asses, semen collection, cryopreservation, and artificial insemination (AI) with frozen-thawed semen have been scarcely described and success rate, particularly following AI, is reportedly low. In the absence of reliable protocols, assisted reproductive technologies cannot support the conservation efforts aimed at endangered wild ass species and domestic donkey breeds. Two experiments were conducted in this study. In experiment 1 we evaluated freezing Abyssinian donkey (N = 5, 4 ejaculates each) spermatozoa using three freezing extenders (Berliner Cryomedium + glycerol, BC+G; BotuCrio, BOTU; INRAFreeze, INRA) and two cryopreservation techniques (liquid nitrogen vapour, LNV; directional freezing, DF). Post-thaw evaluation indicated that BOTU and INRA were similar and both superior to BC+G (P ≤ 0.004 for all motility tests), and that DF was superior to LNV (P < 0.002 for all evaluation parameters). In experiment 2, relying on these results, we used Abyssinian donkey sperm frozen in BOTU and INRA by DF for AI (N = 20). Prior to AI, thawed samples were diluted in corresponding centrifugation media or autologous seminal fluids at 1:1 ratio. No difference was found between BOTU and INRA or between the addition of seminal fluids or media, all resulting in ~50% pregnancy, and no differences were noted between males (N = 4). The size of pre-ovulatory follicle was a significant (P = 0.001) predictor for AI success with 9/10 pregnancies occurring when follicular size ranged between 33.1-37.4 mm, no pregnancy when it was smaller, and only one when larger. A number of ass species face the risk of extinction. Knowledge gained in this study on the Abyssinian donkey can be customised and transferred to its closely related endangered species and breeds.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28520723 PMCID: PMC5435134 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0175637
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Fig 1Experimental design flow chart.
The study consisted of two stages (experiments). The first stage aimed to assess three freezing extenders (BC+G, BOTU, INRA) and two freezing techniques—directional freezing (DF) and freezing in the vapour phase over liquid nitrogen (LNV). At the second stage, samples frozen with the selected extenders (BOTU and INRA) and freezing technique (DF) were used for AI. After thawing, the BOTU samples were either diluted 1:1 in autologous seminal plasma or in BotuSemen. The INRA samples were either diluted 1:1 in autologous seminal plasma or used as is. A horizontal line on the figure indicates the decision-making point between the two experimental stages.
Fresh donkey semen parameters.
| Parameter | Jack | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | |
| Volume (mL) | 39.8 ± 12.3 | 40.4 ± 7.1 | 41.2 ± 28.0 | 26.4 ± 7.5 | 56.6 ± 6.7 |
| Concentration (× 106) | 347 ± 73ab | 150 ± 47bc | 340 ± 164ab | 406 ± 149a | 31 ± 21c |
| Total motility (%) | 72.0 ± 13.5 | 71.0 ± 4.2 | 50.0 ± 28.5 | 63.0 ± 17.9 | 67.0 ± 13.5 |
| Progressive motility (%) | 63.0 ± 17.9 | 64.0 ± 4.2 | 45.0 ± 28.5 | 60.0 ± 17.0 | 59.0 ± 16.7 |
| Vigour | 3.1 ± 0.7 | 3.2 ± 0.4 | 3.4 ± 1.1 | 4.2 ± 0.3 | 3.5 ± .07 |
| Viability (%) | 80.5 ± 9.0 | 83.0 ± 5.4 | 84.3 ± 9.4 | 77.0 ± 12.5 | 78.8 ± 7.4 |
| Normal morphology (%) | 73.3 ± 20.7 | 88.8 ± 5.9 | 92.5 ± 7.2 | 75.8 ± 16.8 | 74.5 ± 10.7 |
Values are presented as Mean ± SD. Concentration values with different superscript letter differ significantly at P < 0.05. Jacks did not differ in all other parameters evaluated. Values of Total motility and Vigour were not normally distributed (Levene Test of Homogeneity of Variances) so they were SQRT transformed prior to analysis. Values of Total Motility lacked normal distribution even when the sample with 10% motility was removed from analysis.
Donkey sperm post-thaw evaluation by freezing technique.
| Parameter | BC+G | BOTU | INRA | All | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tot. Motil. % | 20.1±10.9* | 10.6±8.6* | 37.5±10.0* | 31.9±10.6* | 38.3±6.9* | 22.5±10.7* | 32.0±12.6* | 21.5±13.2* |
| Prog. Motil. % | 12.3±9.7* | 6.1±7.0* | 32.2±10.2* | 26.9±10.7* | 35.3±7.4* | 20.1±10.8* | 26.6±13.6* | 17.5±12.9* |
| Vigour | 1.8±0.5 | 1.6±0.5 | 2.6±0.6 | 2.5±0.5 | 3.2±0.5* | 2.9±0.4* | 2.5±0.8* | 2.3±0.7* |
| Viability % | 81.4±7.8* | 72.0±9.4* | 77.0±8.8 | 75.0±7.9 | 76.6±8.1 | 70.4±10.2 | 78.3±8.4* | 72.5±9.3* |
| Morphology % | 87.6±7.4 | 88.4±5.4 | 84.5±8.9* | 89.4±7.0* | 86.7±5.2* | 90.4±6.2* | 86.3±7.3* | 89.4±6.1* |
| 3h Motility % | 9.5±10.5* | 4.2±4.6* | 2.6±3.7 | 1.9±2.3 | 29.4±10.6* | 11.7±8.0* | 13.9±14.4* | 5.9±6.8* |
Values marked with asterisk under the same evaluation parameter and within the same extender differ significantly at P < 0.05 (Paired-sample t-test).
df values are: 17 in each extender; 53 when data from all extenders was combined.
Tot. Motil. = Total Motility; Prog. Motil. = Progressive Motility; BC+G = Berliner Cryomedium + Glycerol; BOTU = BotuCrio; INRA = InraFreeze; DF = Directional Freezing; LNV = freezing in the vapour phase above liquid nitrogen.
Donkey sperm post-thaw evaluations by extender.
| Parameter | BC+G | BOTU | INRA |
|---|---|---|---|
| Tot. Motil. % | 15.24 ± 10.79 a | 34.72 ± 10.55 b | 30.42 ± 11.98 b |
| Prog. Motil. % | 9.14 ± 8.86 a | 29.58 ± 10.65 b | 27.69 ± 11.91 b |
| Vigour | 1.69 ± 0.52 a | 2.56 ± 0.56 b | 3.03 ± 0.48 c |
| Viability % | 76.59 ± 9.81 | 76.00 ± 8.31 | 73.5 ± 9.59 |
| Morphology % | 88.03 ± 6.38 | 86.97 ± 8.29 | 88.53 ± 5.92 |
| 3h Motility % | 6.78 ± 8.33 b | 2.25 ± 3.07 a | 20.56 ± 12.90 c |
Values with different superscript letter in the same row differ significantly at P < 0.05.
Tot. Motil. = Total Motility; Prog. Motil. = Progressive Motility; BC+G = Berliner Cryomedium +Glycerol; BOTU = BotuCrio; INRA = InraFreeze.
Fig 2Four of the foals (with their dams) born following artificial insemination performed with frozen-thawed Abyssinian donkey sperm in the present study.
No abnormalities were noted in the newborn.