Literature DB >> 28517242

Race/ethnicity is associated with ABO-nonidentical liver transplantation in the United States.

Jin Ge1, John P Roberts2, Jennifer C Lai1,3.   

Abstract

United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) policies allow for ABO-nonidentical liver transplantation (LT) in candidates with Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) scores greater than 30. Previous studies showed ABO-nonidentical LT resulted in an 18% and 55% net gain in livers for B and AB candidates. These results suggested that the current liver ABO allocation policies may need refinement. There are, however, strong associations between ABO blood groups and race/ethnicity. We hypothesized that race/ethnicity is associated with ABO-nonidentical LT and that this is primarily influenced by recipient ABO status. We examined non-status 1 adult candidates registered between July 1, 2013, and December 31, 2015. There were 27 835 candidates (70% non-Hispanic White, 15% Hispanic, 9% Black, 4% Asian, 1% Other/Multiracial). A total of 11 369 underwent deceased donor LT: 93% ABO identical, 6% ABO compatible, and 1% ABO incompatible. Black and Asian race/ethnicity were associated with increased likelihoods of ABO-nonidentical LT. Adjustment for disease etiology, listing MELD, transplant center volume, and UNOS region did not alter this association. Stepwise inclusion of recipient ABO status did eliminate this significant association of race/ethnicity with ABO-nonidentical LT. Blacks and Asians may be advantaged by ABO-nonidentical LT, and we suspect that changes to the existing policies may disproportionately impact these groups.
© 2017 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ABO; allocation; health disparities; race/ethnicity

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28517242      PMCID: PMC5936636          DOI: 10.1111/ctr.13011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Transplant        ISSN: 0902-0063            Impact factor:   2.863


  21 in total

1.  Disparity in use of orthotopic liver transplantation among blacks and whites.

Authors:  Andrea E Reid; Maria Resnick; YuChiao Chang; Nathan Buerstatte; Joel S Weissman
Journal:  Liver Transpl       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 5.799

2.  ABO blood group-related waiting list disparities in liver transplant candidates: effect of the MELD adoption.

Authors:  Michele Barone; Alfonso W Avolio; Alfredo Di Leo; Patrizia Burra; Antonio Francavilla
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  2008-03-27       Impact factor: 4.939

3.  Increased waiting time for liver transplantation results in higher mortality.

Authors:  J E Everhart; M Lombardero; K M Detre; R K Zetterman; R H Wiesner; J R Lake; J H Hoofnagle
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  1997-11-15       Impact factor: 4.939

4.  Preface. OPTN/SRTR 2013 Annual Data Report.

Authors: 
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 8.086

Review 5.  Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients: collecting, analyzing, and reporting data on transplantation in the United States.

Authors:  Susan Leppke; Tabitha Leighton; David Zaun; Shu-Cheng Chen; Melissa Skeans; Ajay K Israni; Jon J Snyder; Bertram L Kasiske
Journal:  Transplant Rev (Orlando)       Date:  2013-03-06       Impact factor: 3.943

6.  The "ABO cross-transplantation problem" in liver transplantation in Korea.

Authors:  M S Park; K W Lee; T You; S W Suh; H Kim; Y Choi; G Hong; O K Kim; N J Yi; K S Suh
Journal:  Transplant Proc       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 1.066

7.  Liver transplantation with deceased ABO-incompatible donors is life-saving but associated with increased risk of rejection and post-transplant complications.

Authors:  Trygve Thorsen; Ulrika S Dahlgren; Einar Martin Aandahl; Krzysztof Grzyb; Tom H Karlsen; Kirsten M Boberg; Lennart Rydberg; Christian Naper; Aksel Foss; William Bennet
Journal:  Transpl Int       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 3.782

8.  Early changes in liver distribution following implementation of Share 35.

Authors:  A B Massie; E K H Chow; C E Wickliffe; X Luo; S E Gentry; D C Mulligan; D L Segev
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 8.086

Review 9.  Old versus new: Progress in reaching the goals of the new kidney allocation system.

Authors:  Connie J Wang; James B Wetmore; Ajay K Israni
Journal:  Hum Immunol       Date:  2016-08-12       Impact factor: 2.850

10.  Chronic liver disease mortality in the United States, 1990-1998.

Authors:  Sirenda Vong; Beth P Bell
Journal:  Hepatology       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 17.425

View more
  3 in total

1.  Not everything that counts can be counted: Tracking long-term outcomes in pediatric liver transplant recipients.

Authors:  Katherine Cheng; Sandy Feng; John C Bucuvalas; Josh Levitsky; Emily R Perito
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2022-01-08       Impact factor: 8.086

2.  NASH Leading Cause of Liver Transplant in Women: Updated Analysis of Indications For Liver Transplant and Ethnic and Gender Variances.

Authors:  Mazen Noureddin; Aarshi Vipani; Catherine Bresee; Tsuyoshi Todo; Irene K Kim; Naim Alkhouri; Veronica Wendy Setiawan; Tram Tran; Walid S Ayoub; Shelly C Lu; Andrew S Klein; Vinay Sundaram; Nicholas N Nissen
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2018-06-08       Impact factor: 12.045

3.  The influence of equitable access policies and socioeconomic factors on post-liver transplant survival.

Authors:  Dora C Huang; Zachary P Fricker; Saleh Alqahtani; Hani Tamim; Behnam Saberi; Alan Bonder
Journal:  EClinicalMedicine       Date:  2021-09-16
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.