| Literature DB >> 28514949 |
Nataša Zorić1, Ivan Kosalec2, Siniša Tomić1, Ivan Bobnjarić2, Mario Jug2, Toni Vlainić3, Josipa Vlainić4.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: We investigated the mechanisms of anti-Candida action of isoquinoline alkaloid berberine, active constituent of medically important plants of Barberry species.Entities:
Keywords: Antifungal; Berberine; Candida albicans; Membrane
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28514949 PMCID: PMC5436450 DOI: 10.1186/s12906-017-1773-5
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Complement Altern Med ISSN: 1472-6882 Impact factor: 3.659
Fig. 1Fluorescence emitted by berberine sulfate upon intracellular localization in C. albicans cells. The samples were treated with different berberine concentrations for 15 and 60 min. The data are shown as means ± SD
Fig. 2Non-linear regression line assessing viability of C. albicans treated with berberine. The data are shown as means ± SD
Results of the quantitative fluorescent assay for simultaneous identification of apoptotic and necrotic cells in C. albicans ATCC 90028 treated with berberine in vitro for 3 h
| Sample | Viable cells (%) | Non-viable cells | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Σ | Apoptosis (%) | Necrosis (%) | ||
| ½ MIC | 88.7 ± 2.1 | 11.3 ± 2.1MIC,2xMIC,NC,PC | 7.7 ± 1.5 MIC,2xMIC,PC | 3.7 ± 2.52xMIC,PC |
| MIC | 75.3 ± 2.5 | 24.7 ± 2.52xMIC,NC,PC | 18.0 ± 1.72xMIC,NC,PC | 6.7 ± 1.2NC |
| 2× MIC | 62.3 ± 9.7 | 37.7 ± 9.7NC | 28.3 ± 10.3NC | 9.3 ± 0.6NC |
| PC | 56.0 ± 4.6 | 44.0 ± 4.6NC | 35.3 ± 2.3NC | 8.7 ± 2.5NC |
| NC | 94.7 ± 1.2 | 5.3 ± 1.2 | 4.0 ± 1.7 | 1.3 ± 0.6 |
300 cells per sample per each experimental point were analysed. Mean values ± SD are shown. MIC minimal inhibitory concentration, PC positive control, NC negative control (RPMI). Statistical significance of data was evaluated using χ2 test. The level of statistical significance was set at P < 0.05. The abbreviations next to the means indicate from which groups the relevant group differs with statistical significance
Fig. 3Effect of different concentrations of berberine on germ tube formation in C. albicans; NC – intact cells. The data are shown as means ± SD
Fig. 4Modulation of ergosterol content at different concentration of berberine; PC-voriconazole 4 μg/mL1; NC-intact cells. The data are shown as means ± SD
Fig. 5The effect of berberine on cell permeability and integrity of cell membranes of C. albicans cells. The data are shown as means ± SD
Fig. 6The effect of different berberine concentrations on membrane depolarisation of C. albicans cells as a measure of membrane damage and cell viability. The data are shown as means ± SDs
Fig. 7Lipid peroxidation levels in control and berberine-treated cells of C. albicans and their isolated membranes. Berberine induced dose-dependent increase in TBARS /MDA level as a measure of lipid peroxidation. Cells were treated with berberine (1/4×MIC, ½×MIC and 1×MIC) and the level of lipid peroxidation was assessed in complete cells and membrane preparations. MDA concentration was determined using the TBARS assay. The data are presented as mean values ± SD (*p < 0.01; **p < 0.05; ***p < 0.001).
Fig. 8Changes in ROS generation upon berberine treatment of C. albicans cells. Berberine at sub MIC concentration induced ROS production. The augmentation of ROS production reached statistical significance upon the treatment with MIC concentration of berberine. The data are presented as mean values ± SD (*p < 0.05).