Literature DB >> 28513827

Using the dual-criteria methods to supplement visual inspection: An analysis of nonsimulated data.

Marc J Lanovaz1, Sarah C Huxley1, Marie-Michèle Dufour1.   

Abstract

The purpose of our study was to examine the probability of observing false positives in nonsimulated data using the dual-criteria methods. We extracted data from published studies to produce a series of 16,927 datasets and then assessed the proportion of false positives for various phase lengths. Our results indicate that collecting at least three data points in the first phase (Phase A) and at least five data points in the second phase (Phase B) is generally sufficient to produce acceptable levels of false positives.
© 2017 Society for the Experimental Analysis of Behavior.

Keywords:  data analysis; dual-criteria method; false positive; single-case designs; type I error

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28513827     DOI: 10.1002/jaba.394

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal        ISSN: 0021-8855


  11 in total

1.  Correspondence between Fail-Safe k and Dual-Criteria Methods: Analysis of Data Series Stability.

Authors:  John Michael Falligant; Michael P Kranak; Jonathan D Schmidt; Griffin W Rooker
Journal:  Perspect Behav Sci       Date:  2020-05-20

2.  Evaluating sources of baseline data using dual-criteria and conservative dual-criteria methods: A quantitative analysis.

Authors:  John Michael Falligant; Molly K McNulty; Michael P Kranak; Nicole L Hausman; Griffin W Rooker
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  2020-04-26

3.  An Overview of Scientific Reproducibility: Consideration of Relevant Issues for Behavior Science/Analysis.

Authors:  Sean Laraway; Susan Snycerski; Sean Pradhan; Bradley E Huitema
Journal:  Perspect Behav Sci       Date:  2019-03-22

4.  Waiting for baseline stability in single-case designs: Is it worth the time and effort?

Authors:  Marc J Lanovaz; Rachel Primiani
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2022-04-25

5.  Quantitative Techniques and Graphical Representations for Interpreting Results from Alternating Treatment Design.

Authors:  Rumen Manolov; René Tanious; Patrick Onghena
Journal:  Perspect Behav Sci       Date:  2021-05-13

6.  Further Analysis of Advanced Quantitative Methods and Supplemental Interpretative Aids with Single-Case Experimental Designs.

Authors:  John Michael Falligant; Michael P Kranak; Louis P Hagopian
Journal:  Perspect Behav Sci       Date:  2021-10-22

7.  Implementing Automated Nonparametric Statistical Analysis on Functional Analysis Data: A Guide for Practitioners and Researchers.

Authors:  Michael P Kranak; Scott S Hall
Journal:  Perspect Behav Sci       Date:  2021-05-24

8.  Brief Report: Mobile Technology to Support Parents in Reducing Stereotypy.

Authors:  Lydia Trudel; Marc J Lanovaz; Isabelle Préfontaine
Journal:  J Autism Dev Disord       Date:  2021-07

9.  Machine Learning to Analyze Single-Case Data: A Proof of Concept.

Authors:  Marc J Lanovaz; Antonia R Giannakakos; Océane Destras
Journal:  Perspect Behav Sci       Date:  2020-01-21

Review 10.  Eight Months of Telehealth for a State-Funded Project in Foster Care and Related Services: Progress Made and Lessons Learned.

Authors:  Jodi C Coon; Helena Bush; John T Rapp
Journal:  Behav Anal Pract       Date:  2022-03-16
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.