| Literature DB >> 28512346 |
Abstract
Mounting evidence of cryptic species in the marine realm emphasizes the necessity to thoroughly revise our current perceptions of marine biodiversity and species distributions. Here, we used mitochondrial cytochrome oxidase subunit I (mtDNA COI) and nuclear ribosomal internal transcribed spacer (nrDNA ITS) to investigate cryptic diversity and potential hybridization in the Japanese mantis shrimp Oratosquilla oratoria in the Northwestern (NW) Pacific. Both mitochondrial and nuclear gene genealogies revealed two cryptic species in this morphotaxon, which was further confirmed by extensive population-level analyses. One cryptic species is restricted to cold waters with a distribution range corresponding to temperate affinities, while the other dwelled warm waters influenced by the Kuroshio Current. Their divergence was postulated to be attributable to the vicariant event which resulted from the isolation of the Sea of Japan during the middle Pliocene (c. 3.85 Mya, 95% HPD 2.23-6.07 Mya). Allopatric speciation was maintained by limited genetic exchange due to their habitat preferences. Furthermore, the observation of recombinant nrDNA ITS sequence and intra-individual ITS polymorphism suggested recent hybridization event of the two cryptic species occurred in sympatric areas. Our study also illustrated that the Changjiang River outflow might act as an oceanic barrier to gene flow and promoted allopatric diversification in O. oratoria species complex.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28512346 PMCID: PMC5434036 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-017-02059-7
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Figure 1Sample locations and relative frequency of two genetic lineages inferred from mtDNA COI (a) and nrDNA ITS (b). For each dataset, the corresponding maximum-likelihood (ML) and Bayesian inference (BI) trees are also presented. Numbers above branches represent maximum likelihood bootstrap (left) and Bayesian posterior probabilities (right) for the two major lineages. The map also presented Sea Surface Temperature (SST) in the NW Pacific in winter (2002–2011), which was modified from ref. 78. SCSWC, South China Sea Warm Current; TWC, Taiwan Warm Current; CCC, China Coastal Current; CRDW, Changjiang River Diluted Water; YSWC, Yellow Sea Warm Current; TSWC, Tsushima Warm Current.
Figure 2Minimum spanning trees constructed from mtDNA COI (a) and nrDNA ITS (b) with the sizes of circles proportionally to haplotype/ribotype frequency. The population origins of haplotypes/ribotypes are indicated by colours. Perpendicular tick marks on the lines joining haplotypes/ribotypes represent the number of nucleotide substitutions.
Sample information and molecular diversity indices for O. oratoria.
| Sample site | Abb | Date of collection | mtCOI | nrITS | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
| [1] Otaru | OT | 2015.06 | 30 | 20 | 0.947 ± 0.027 | 0.005 ± 0.003 | N | 18 | 12 | 0.895 ± 0.065 | 0.002 ± 0.001 | N |
| [2] Aomori | AO | 2015.10 | 30 | 18 | 0.959 ± 0.018 | 0.016 ± 0.008 | N, S | 27 | 19 | 0.917 ± 0.047 | 0.002 ± 0.001 | N |
| [3] Qinhuangdao | QHD | 2014.05 | 20 | 18 | 0.984 ± 0.024 | 0.006 ± 0.004 | N | |||||
| [4] Dalian | DL | 2014.05 | 30 | 17 | 0.933 ± 0.028 | 0.005 ± 0.003 | N | 8 | 7 | 0.964 ± 0.077 | 0.002 ± 0.001 | N |
| [5] Dongying | DY | 2014.11 | 23 | 17 | 0.961 ± 0.027 | 0.005 ± 0.003 | N | 19 | 12 | 0.906 ± 0.050 | 0.002 ± 0.001 | N |
| [6] Qingdao | QD | 2014.05 | 30 | 23 | 0.977 ± 0.015 | 0.005 ± 0.003 | N | 16 | 10 | 0.867 ± 0.079 | 0.002 ± 0.001 | N |
| [7] Lianyungang | LYG | 2015.09 | 30 | 23 | 0.977 ± 0.016 | 0.005 ± 0.003 | N | |||||
| [8] Sheyang | SY | 2015.05 | 30 | 20 | 0.961 ± 0.020 | 0.009 ± 0.005 | N, S | |||||
| [9] Dafeng | DF | 2015.05 | 30 | 24 | 0.972 ± 0.021 | 0.035 ± 0.018 | N, S | 32 | 25 | 0.980 ± 0.015 | 0.010 ± 0.005 | N, S |
| [10] Ishikawa | IS | 2013.10 | 20 | 18 | 0.990 ± 0.019 | 0.037 ± 0.019 | N, S | 44 | 39 | 0.988 ± 0.010 | 0.009 ± 0.005 | N, S |
| [11] Aichi | AI | 2015.10 | 20 | 18 | 0.984 ± 0.024 | 0.032 ± 0.016 | N, S | 26 | 24 | 0.994 ± 0.013 | 0.010 ± 0.005 | N, S |
| [12] Setonaikai | SE | 2015.10 | 30 | 19 | 0.936 ± 0.032 | 0.013 ± 0.007 | N, S | 20 | 19 | 0.995 ± 0.018 | 0.007 ± 0.004 | N, S |
| [13] Ariake Sea | AS | 2015.02 | 30 | 25 | 0.975 ± 0.021 | 0.010 ± 0.005 | N, S | 13 | 13 | 1.000 ± 0.030 | 0.008 ± 0.005 | N, S |
| [14] Shengshan | SS | 2015.07 | 30 | 23 | 0.961 ± 0.027 | 0.007 ± 0.004 | S | 31 | 26 | 0.989 ± 0.011 | 0.005 ± 0.003 | S |
| [15] Nanji | NJ | 2014.06 | 30 | 20 | 0.954 ± 0.023 | 0.006 ± 0.003 | S | 16 | 15 | 0.992 ± 0.025 | 0.004 ± 0.003 | S |
| [16] Meizhou Island | MI | 2014.04 | 22 | 15 | 0.931 ± 0.040 | 0.005 ± 0.003 | S | |||||
| [17] Xiamen | XM | 2014.04 | 20 | 13 | 0.926 ± 0.043 | 0.005 ± 0.003 | S | 16 | 14 | 0.983 ± 0.028 | 0.004 ± 0.002 | S |
| [18] Beihai | BH | 2015.07 | 16 | 14 | 0.975 ± 0.035 | 0.006 ± 0.003 | S | 9 | 9 | 1.000 ± 0.052 | 0.006 ± 0.003 | S |
| [19] Xinying | XY | 2007.11 | 10 | 9 | 0.978 ± 0.054 | 0.006 ± 0.004 | S | |||||
| [20] Puqian | PQ | 2007.12 | 3 | 2 | 0.677 ± 0.314 | 0.003 ± 0.003 | S | |||||
| [21] Yinggehai | YGH | 2007.12 | 8 | 8 | 1.000 ± 0.063 | 0.004 ± 0.003 | S | |||||
| [22] Sanya | SYS | 2008.03 | 6 | 5 | 0.933 ± 0.122 | 0.006 ± 0.004 | S | |||||
| Total | 498 | 236 | 0.981 ± 0.002 | 0.032 ± 0.016 | 295 | 207 | 0.982 ± 0.005 | 0.032 ± 0.015 | ||||
Abb., abbreviation of locality; N , number of sequenced individuals; n, number of haplotypes; N , number of clones; h, haplotype diversity; л, nucleotide diversity; L, lineage found in each locality.
Pairwise F ST comparisons between populations inferred from mtDNA COI (below diagonal) and nrDNA ITS (above diagonal).
| [1] | [2] | [3] | [4] | [5] | [6] | [7] | [8] | [9] | [10] | [11] | [12] | [13] | [14] | [15] | [16] | [17] | [18] | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| [1] OT | — | 0.017 | 0.041 | 0.047* | 0.017 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
| [2] AO | 0.041 | — | −0.016 | −0.004 | −0.010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
| [3] QHD | −0.002 | 0.029 | — | |||||||||||||||
| [4] DL | 0.019 | 0.036 | 0.004 | — | −0.020 | −0.028 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
| [5] DY | −0.012 | 0.033 | −0.001 | 0.009 | — | −0.002 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
| [6] QD | 0.025* | 0.036 | −0.006 | −0.009 | 0.02 | — |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
| [7] LYG | 0.017 | 0.033 | −0.001 | 0.004 | 0.008 | 0.002 | — | |||||||||||
| [8] SY | 0.001 | −0.001 | −0.004 | −0.004 | −0.013 | −0.004 | −0.01 | — | ||||||||||
| [9] DF |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| — | 0.000 | −0.002 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| [10] IS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| −0.011 | — | −0.008 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| [11] AI |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| −0.029 | 0.020 | — |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| [12] SE |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| — | −0.025 | 0.101** | 0.062* | 0.079* | 0.045 | |
| [13] AS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| −0.003 | — | 0.137** | 0.103** | 0.123** | 0.068 | |
| [14] SS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 0.007 | 0.021* | — | 0.013 | 0.016 | −0.007 | |
| [15] NJ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 0.019 | 0.002 | 0.014 | — | −0.028 | −0.016 | |
| [16] MI |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 0.015 | −0.001 | −0.009 | −0.008 | — | ||
| [17] XM |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 0.036 | 0.012 | 0.024 | 0.011 | 0.008 | — | −0.007 |
| [18] BH |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 0.011 | −0.012 | 0.004 | −0.021 | −0.015 | −0.011 | — |
| [19–22] HN |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 0.019 | 0.009 | −0.014 | −0.001 | −0.018 | 0.015 | −0.015 |
* P < 0.05; ** P < 0.001.
Results of analysis of molecular variance (AMOVA) for different hierarchical analyses of O. oratoria populations.
| Structure tested | mtDNA COI | nrDNA ITS | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| df | Variance | %total |
| df | Variance | %total |
| |
| Two gene pools | (Group I: 1–10; II: 11–22) | (Group I: 1–2, 4–6, 9–10; II: 11–15, 17–18) | ||||||
| Among regions | 1 | 18.35 | 72.32 |
| 1 | 2.79 | 38.72 |
|
| Among populations with region | 16 | 1.32 | 7.15 |
| 12 | 0.81 | 11.26 |
|
| Wthin populations | 450 | 3.79 | 20.53 |
| 281 | 3.60 | 50.02 |
|
| Two gene pools | (Group I: 1–8; II: 12–22) | (Group I: 1–2, 4–6; II: 12–15, 17–18) | ||||||
| Among regions | 1 | 18.55 | 88.24 |
| 1 | 6.34 | 71.28 |
|
| Among populations with region | 13 | 0.02 | 0.12 |
| 9 | 0.07 | 0.83 |
|
| Wthin populations | 383 | 2.45 | 11.64 |
| 182 | 2.48 | 27.89 |
|
* P < 0.05; ** P < 0.001.
Summary of molecular diversity and demographic analyses for two lineages of O. oratoria.
| Groups |
|
|
|
| Tajima’s | Fu’s | Mismatch distribution | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||
|
| ||||||||||||
| Lineage N | 249 | 104 | 0.969 ± 0.005 | 0.005 ± 0.003 | −2.119 | 0.000 | −25.842 | 0.000 | 0.689 | 9999 | 0.376 | 0.548 |
| Lineage S | 249 | 132 | 0.954 ± 0.008 | 0.006 ± 0.003 | −2.345 | 0.000 | −25.654 | 0.000 | 1.182 | 68.672 | 0.965 | 0.727 |
|
| ||||||||||||
| Lineage N | 156 | 100 | 0.941±0.015 | 0.003 ± 0.001 | −2.865 | 0.000 | −26.409 | 0.000 | 0.682 | 271.895 | 0.910 | 0.676 |
| Lineage S | 139 | 107 | 0.992 ± 0.003 | 0.005 ± 0.002 | −2.650 | 0.000 | −25.135 | 0.000 | 0.796 | 121.719 | 0.782 | 0.689 |
Number of individuals (N), number of haplotypes or ribotypes (n), haplotype diversity (h), nucleotide diversity (л), Tajima’s D and Fu’s F S with corresponding P values for each lineage are shown. θ 0 and θ 1 are θ parameter before and after expansion; P values for the sum of squared deviations (SSD) and raggedness index (HRI) under the hypothesis of sudden expansion of each lineage are also shown.
Figure 3Mismatch distributions and Bayesian skyline plots for each genetic lineage. In mismatch distributions, bars represent the observed frequency of pairwise differences, whereas the solid lines show the expected values under the sudden expansion model. The BSPs show N T (N = effective population size; T = generation time) changes through time. Black lines represent median estimates while the blue lines show the 95% highest posterior density (HPD) limits.