Literature DB >> 28511094

Isolation and genetic analysis of pure cells from forensic biological mixtures: The precision of a digital approach.

F Fontana1, C Rapone2, G Bregola3, R Aversa3, A de Meo2, G Signorini3, M Sergio3, A Ferrarini3, R Lanzellotto3, G Medoro3, G Giorgini3, N Manaresi3, A Berti2.   

Abstract

Latest genotyping technologies allow to achieve a reliable genetic profile for the offender identification even from extremely minute biological evidence. The ultimate challenge occurs when genetic profiles need to be retrieved from a mixture, which is composed of biological material from two or more individuals. In this case, DNA profiling will often result in a complex genetic profile, which is then subject matter for statistical analysis. In principle, when more individuals contribute to a mixture with different biological fluids, their single genetic profiles can be obtained by separating the distinct cell types (e.g. epithelial cells, blood cells, sperm), prior to genotyping. Different approaches have been investigated for this purpose, such as fluorescent-activated cell sorting (FACS) or laser capture microdissection (LCM), but currently none of these methods can guarantee the complete separation of different type of cells present in a mixture. In other fields of application, such as oncology, DEPArray™ technology, an image-based, microfluidic digital sorter, has been widely proven to enable the separation of pure cells, with single-cell precision. This study investigates the applicability of DEPArray™ technology to forensic samples analysis, focusing on the resolution of the forensic mixture problem. For the first time, we report here the development of an application-specific DEPArray™ workflow enabling the detection and recovery of pure homogeneous cell pools from simulated blood/saliva and semen/saliva mixtures, providing full genetic match with genetic profiles of corresponding donors. In addition, we assess the performance of standard forensic methods for DNA quantitation and genotyping on low-count, DEPArray™-isolated cells, showing that pure, almost complete profiles can be obtained from as few as ten haploid cells. Finally, we explore the applicability in real casework samples, demonstrating that the described approach provides complete separation of cells with outstanding precision. In all examined cases, DEPArray™ technology proves to be a groundbreaking technology for the resolution of forensic biological mixtures, through the precise isolation of pure cells for an incontrovertible attribution of the obtained genetic profiles.
Copyright © 2017 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Keywords:  DEPArray; Digital cell-sorting; Forensic mixture; Genotyping; Pure-cell separation; Single-cell

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28511094     DOI: 10.1016/j.fsigen.2017.04.023

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Forensic Sci Int Genet        ISSN: 1872-4973            Impact factor:   4.882


  11 in total

1.  Towards developing forensically relevant single-cell pipelines by incorporating direct-to-PCR extraction: compatibility, signal quality, and allele detection.

Authors:  Nidhi Sheth; Harish Swaminathan; Amanda J Gonzalez; Ken R Duffy; Catherine M Grgicak
Journal:  Int J Legal Med       Date:  2021-01-23       Impact factor: 2.686

Review 2.  Separation/extraction, detection, and interpretation of DNA mixtures in forensic science (review).

Authors:  Ruiyang Tao; Shouyu Wang; Jiashuo Zhang; Jingyi Zhang; Zihao Yang; Xiang Sheng; Yiping Hou; Suhua Zhang; Chengtao Li
Journal:  Int J Legal Med       Date:  2018-05-25       Impact factor: 2.686

3.  Comparison between MACSprep™ forensic sperm microbead kit and Erase Sperm Isolation kit for the enrichment of sperm fractions recovered from sexual assault samples.

Authors:  Frederic Grosjean; Marylou Favre; Vincent Castella
Journal:  Int J Legal Med       Date:  2022-06-30       Impact factor: 2.686

Review 4.  DEPArray™ system: An automatic image-based sorter for isolation of pure circulating tumor cells.

Authors:  Mariano Di Trapani; Nicolò Manaresi; Gianni Medoro
Journal:  Cytometry A       Date:  2018-12       Impact factor: 4.355

5.  Optical tweezers as an effective tool for spermatozoa isolation from mixed forensic samples.

Authors:  Nicole Auka; Michael Valle; Bobby D Cox; Peter D Wilkerson; Tracey Dawson Cruz; Joseph E Reiner; Sarah J Seashols-Williams
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-02-07       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Expression of CD38 on Macrophages Predicts Improved Prognosis in Hepatocellular Carcinoma.

Authors:  Jian Hang Lam; Harry Ho Man Ng; Chun Jye Lim; Xin Ni Sim; Fabio Malavasi; Huihua Li; Josh Jie Hua Loh; Khin Sabai; Joo-Kyung Kim; Clara Chong Hui Ong; Tracy Loh; Wei Qiang Leow; Su Pin Choo; Han Chong Toh; Ser Yee Lee; Chung Yip Chan; Valerie Chew; Tong Seng Lim; Joe Yeong; Tony Kiat Hon Lim
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2019-09-04       Impact factor: 7.561

7.  Revisiting single cell analysis in forensic science.

Authors:  Davis R L Watkins; Dan Myers; Hannah E Xavier; Michael A Marciano
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-03-29       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Comparative Mutational Profiling of Hematopoietic Progenitor Cells and Circulating Endothelial Cells (CECs) in Patients with Primary Myelofibrosis.

Authors:  Mirko Farina; Simona Bernardi; Nicola Polverelli; Mariella D'Adda; Michele Malagola; Katia Bosio; Federica Re; Camillo Almici; Andrew Dunbar; Ross L Levine; Domenico Russo
Journal:  Cells       Date:  2021-10-15       Impact factor: 6.600

9.  Precision DNA Mixture Interpretation with Single-Cell Profiling.

Authors:  Jianye Ge; Jonathan L King; Amy Smuts; Bruce Budowle
Journal:  Genes (Basel)       Date:  2021-10-20       Impact factor: 4.096

10.  Pushing the Boundaries: Forensic DNA Phenotyping Challenged by Single-Cell Sequencing.

Authors:  Marta Diepenbroek; Birgit Bayer; Katja Anslinger
Journal:  Genes (Basel)       Date:  2021-08-30       Impact factor: 4.096

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.