Charles E Cunningham1,2, Robert B Zipursky1,3, Bruce K Christensen4, Peter J Bieling1,3, Victoria Madsen5, Heather Rimas1, Stephanie Mielko1, Fiona Wilson1,3, Ivana Furimsky3, Lisa Jeffs6, Catharine Munn1. 1. a Department of Psychiatry and Behavioural Neurosciences , McMaster University , Hamilton , Ontario , Canada. 2. b Hamilton Health Sciences Corporation , Hamilton , Ontario , Canada. 3. c Mental Health and Addiction Program, St. Joseph's Healthcare Hamilton , Hamilton , Ontario , Canada. 4. d Research School of Psychology , The Australian National University , Canberra , Australia. 5. e Government Nunavut Canada , Iqaluit , Nunavut , Canada. 6. f Youth Wellness Centre, St. Joseph's Healthcare Hamilton , Hamilton , Ontario , Canada.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: We modeled design factors influencing the intent to use a university mental health service. PARTICIPANTS: Between November 2012 and October 2014, 909 undergraduates participated. METHOD: Using a discrete choice experiment, participants chose between hypothetical campus mental health services. RESULTS: Latent class analysis identified three segments. A Psychological/Psychiatric Service segment (45.5%) was most likely to contact campus health services delivered by psychologists or psychiatrists. An Alternative Service segment (39.3%) preferred to talk to peer-counselors who had experienced mental health problems. A Hesitant segment (15.2%) reported greater distress but seemed less intent on seeking help. They preferred services delivered by psychologists or psychiatrists. Simulations predicted that, rather than waiting for standard counseling, the Alternative Service segment would prefer immediate access to E-Mental health. The Usual Care and Hesitant segments would wait 6 months for standard counseling. CONCLUSIONS: E-Mental Health options could engage students who may not wait for standard services.
OBJECTIVE: We modeled design factors influencing the intent to use a university mental health service. PARTICIPANTS: Between November 2012 and October 2014, 909 undergraduates participated. METHOD: Using a discrete choice experiment, participants chose between hypothetical campus mental health services. RESULTS: Latent class analysis identified three segments. A Psychological/Psychiatric Service segment (45.5%) was most likely to contact campus health services delivered by psychologists or psychiatrists. An Alternative Service segment (39.3%) preferred to talk to peer-counselors who had experienced mental health problems. A Hesitant segment (15.2%) reported greater distress but seemed less intent on seeking help. They preferred services delivered by psychologists or psychiatrists. Simulations predicted that, rather than waiting for standard counseling, the Alternative Service segment would prefer immediate access to E-Mental health. The Usual Care and Hesitant segments would wait 6 months for standard counseling. CONCLUSIONS: E-Mental Health options could engage students who may not wait for standard services.
Entities:
Keywords:
College students; discrete choice experiment; mental health; service utilization