Literature DB >> 28510512

Field trial of insect-resistant and herbicide-tolerant genetically modified cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) for environmental risk assessment in Japan.

Yoko Asanuma1, Takahiro Gondo2, Genki Ishigaki2, Koichi Inoue1, Norihiro Zaita1, Melody Muguerza2, Ryo Akashi2.   

Abstract

Japan imports cottonseed mainly from Australia and the USA where more than 96% of all cotton varieties grown are genetically modified (GM). GM crops undergo an environmental risk assessment (ERA) under the Law Concerning the Conservation and Sustainable Use of Biological Diversity before import into Japan. Potential adverse effects on biodiversity are comprehensively assessed based on competitiveness, production of harmful substances and outcrossing ability. Even though imported cottonseed is intended for food and feed uses and not for cultivation, the potential risks from seed spillage during transport must be evaluated. In most cases, the ERA requires data collected from in-country field trials to demonstrate how the GM crop behaves in Japan's environment. Confined field trials in Japan were conducted for the ERA of Lepidoptera-resistant and glufosinate-tolerant GM cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) lines GHB119 and T304-40. These lines were compared with conventional varieties for growth habit, morphological characteristics, seed dormancy, and allelopathic activity associated with competitiveness and production of harmful substances. Outcrossing ability was not a concern due to the absence of sexually compatible wild relatives in Japan. Although slight statistical differences were observed between the GM line and its conventional comparator for some morphological characteristics, transgenes or transformation were not considered to be responsible for these differences. The trial demonstrated that competitiveness and production of harmful substances by these GM cotton lines were equivalent to conventional cotton varieties that have a long history of safe use, and no potential adverse effects to biosafety in Japan were observed.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Gossypium hirsutum L.; biological diversity; environmental risk assessment (ERA); field trial; genetically modified (GM) cotton

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28510512      PMCID: PMC5443612          DOI: 10.1080/21645698.2016.1272754

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  GM Crops Food        ISSN: 2164-5698            Impact factor:   3.074


  6 in total

Review 1.  A review of the environmental safety of the PAT protein.

Authors: 
Journal:  Environ Biosafety Res       Date:  2012-04-30

2.  The similarities of bar and pat gene products make them equally applicable for plant engineers.

Authors:  A Wehrmann; A Van Vliet; C Opsomer; J Botterman; A Schulz
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 54.908

3.  Editor's choice: Evaluating the potential for adverse interactions within genetically engineered breeding stacks.

Authors:  Henry-York Steiner; Claire Halpin; Joseph M Jez; John Kough; Wayne Parrott; Lynne Underhill; Natalie Weber; L Curtis Hannah
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2013-03-04       Impact factor: 8.340

4.  Assays of the production of harmful substances by genetically modified oilseed rape (Brassica napus L.) plants in accordance with regulations for evaluating the impact on biodiversity in Japan.

Authors:  Yoko Asanuma; Tomoe Jinkawa; Hidenori Tanaka; Takahiro Gondo; Norihiro Zaita; Ryo Akashi
Journal:  Transgenic Res       Date:  2010-07-08       Impact factor: 2.788

5.  Transportability of confined field trial data from cultivation to import countries for environmental risk assessment of genetically modified crops.

Authors:  Shuichi Nakai; Kana Hoshikawa; Ayako Shimono; Ryo Ohsawa
Journal:  Transgenic Res       Date:  2015-07-03       Impact factor: 2.788

6.  Recent advances in cotton genomics.

Authors:  Hong-Bin Zhang; Yaning Li; Baohua Wang; Peng W Chee
Journal:  Int J Plant Genomics       Date:  2008
  6 in total
  1 in total

1.  Environmental risk assessment of transgenic miraculin-accumulating tomato in a confined field trial in Japan.

Authors:  Kyoko Hiwasa-Tanase; Tsubasa Yano; Tatsuya Kon; Teruhiko Terakawa; Hiroshi Ezura
Journal:  Plant Biotechnol (Tokyo)       Date:  2021-12-25       Impact factor: 1.133

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.