Literature DB >> 2850904

Comparative evaluation of enalapril and hydrochlorothiazide in elderly patients with mild to moderate hypertension.

J G Gums1, L M Lopez, G P Quay, G H Stein, D L McCarley.   

Abstract

Initial treatment of elderly hypertensive patients with an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor is currently discouraged due to such patients' typical low-renin profile. To validate this principle, we studied 38 elderly males (aged greater than or equal to 65 years) with mild to moderate hypertension, comparing hemodynamic responses to and subjective impressions of enalapril or hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ). After gradual withdrawal of existing antihypertensive therapy and a four-week, single-blind placebo period, each patient was randomized in a double-blind fashion to receive either enalapril 10-20 mg/d or HCTZ 12.5-25 mg/d for two to four weeks. Combination therapy with both agents was employed if either alone failed to reduce seated diastolic BP to less than or equal to 90 mm Hg. Equivalent proportions of patients receiving enalapril or HCTZ (8 of 19 and 10 of 19, respectively; p = ns) responded with significant reductions in systolic and diastolic BP in seated and standing positions. Combination therapy was most effective in patients receiving HCTZ prior to enalapril. In patients receiving enalapril before HCTZ, BP changes were minimal. No adverse effects were observed in the enalapril group but occurred in an equivalent fraction of patients in the other groups (4 of 10 HCTZ alone, 6 of 20 enalapril + HCTZ; p = ns). We conclude that enalapril may be considered a reasonable monotherapeutic antihypertensive agent in some elderly patients. Combination with HCTZ is beneficial in patients who fail to respond adequately to HCTZ alone.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1988        PMID: 2850904     DOI: 10.1177/106002808802200905

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Drug Intell Clin Pharm        ISSN: 0012-6578


  5 in total

Review 1.  Dihydropyridine calcium channel antagonists in the management of hypertension.

Authors:  Benjamin J Epstein; Katherine Vogel; Biff F Palmer
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 2.  ACE inhibitors compared with thiazide diuretics as first-step antihypertensive therapy.

Authors:  I J Perry; D G Beevers
Journal:  Cardiovasc Drugs Ther       Date:  1989-12       Impact factor: 3.727

3.  The influence of hydrochlorothiazide on the pharmacokinetics of enalapril in elderly patients.

Authors:  K Weisser; J Schloos; S Jakob; W Mühlberg; D Platt; E Mutschler
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 2.953

Review 4.  Enalapril. A reappraisal of its pharmacology and therapeutic use in hypertension.

Authors:  P A Todd; K L Goa
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1992-03       Impact factor: 9.546

5.  Combination antihypertensive treatment: is initiation order important?

Authors:  John G Gums; Julie A Johnson
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 3.738

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.