Literature DB >> 17547473

Dihydropyridine calcium channel antagonists in the management of hypertension.

Benjamin J Epstein1, Katherine Vogel, Biff F Palmer.   

Abstract

Dihydropyridine calcium channel antagonists have been maligned in recent years because of concerns regarding their cardiovascular and overall safety profile. Specifically, it was widely publicised in the mid-1990s that these agents might increase the risk of myocardial infarction, gastrointestinal bleeding and cancer. Data linking these agents with increased cardiovascular risk were based on nonrandomised studies and implicated short-acting, immediate-release agents. These results were inappropriately extrapolated to longer-acting compounds, extended-release products, and to the non-dihydropyridine class. Fortunately, recent studies have vindicated the class from safety allegations. These studies are reviewed herein. Compared with both diuretics and contemporary agents, amlodipine decreases cardiovascular events to a similar or greater extent without evidence for increased coronary heart disease, gastrointestinal bleeding or cancer. Despite these data, initial concerns have had lasting repercussions, as the use of dihydropyridine calcium channel antagonists appears to lag behind what emerging data would support. Dihydropyridine calcium channel antagonists have several noteworthy attributes that merit consideration in the management of hypertension. The blood pressure response to this class of drugs is less contingent on patient factors such as age and race compared with other antihypertensive agents (e.g. ACE inhibitors). Dihydropyridine calcium channel antagonists may exert effects that protect against stroke that are independent of their blood pressure-lowering mechanism. Unlike diuretics and beta-adrenoceptor anatagonists (beta-blockers), dihydropyridine calcium channel antagonists are lipid neutral and do not disturb glucose homeostasis. Dihydropyridine calcium channel antagonists demonstrate a highly desirable profile when administered as part of combination therapy. Combinations of dihydropyridine calcium channel antagonists and ACE inhibitors or angiotensin receptor antagonists display additive efficacy and an enviable adverse-effect profile. Collectively, the cardiovascular benefit, metabolic neutrality and homogeneous blood pressure response illuminated in recent studies, and reviewed here, represent a reaffirmation of the benefit of long-acting dihydropyridine calcium channel antagonists and should serve to help reinforce the critical importance of these agents in the therapeutic armamentarium against cardiovascular disease.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17547473     DOI: 10.2165/00003495-200767090-00005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Drugs        ISSN: 0012-6667            Impact factor:   9.546


  93 in total

1.  Effects of an angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibitor, ramipril, on cardiovascular events in high-risk patients.

Authors:  S Yusuf; P Sleight; J Pogue; J Bosch; R Davies; G Dagenais
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2000-01-20       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 2.  Effect of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and angiotensin II type 1 receptor blockers on the rate of new-onset diabetes mellitus: a review and pooled analysis.

Authors:  Kenneth L McCall; Deeatra Craddock; Krystal Edwards
Journal:  Pharmacotherapy       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 4.705

3.  Role of blood pressure and other variables in the differential cardiovascular event rates noted in the Anglo-Scandinavian Cardiac Outcomes Trial-Blood Pressure Lowering Arm (ASCOT-BPLA).

Authors:  Neil R Poulter; Hans Wedel; Björn Dahlöf; Peter S Sever; D Gareth Beevers; Mark Caulfield; Sverre E Kjeldsen; Arni Kristinsson; Gordon T McInnes; Jesper Mehlsen; Markku Nieminen; Eoin O'Brien; Jan Ostergren; Stuart Pocock
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2005 Sep 10-16       Impact factor: 79.321

4.  The effect of irbesartan on the development of diabetic nephropathy in patients with type 2 diabetes.

Authors:  H H Parving; H Lehnert; J Bröchner-Mortensen; R Gomis; S Andersen; P Arner
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2001-09-20       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 5.  Angiotensin receptor blockers versus ACE inhibitors: prevention of death and myocardial infarction in high-risk populations.

Authors:  Benjamin J Epstein; John G Gums
Journal:  Ann Pharmacother       Date:  2005-02-08       Impact factor: 3.154

6.  Clinical events in high-risk hypertensive patients randomly assigned to calcium channel blocker versus angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor in the antihypertensive and lipid-lowering treatment to prevent heart attack trial.

Authors:  Frans H H Leenen; Chuke E Nwachuku; Henry R Black; William C Cushman; Barry R Davis; Lara M Simpson; Michael H Alderman; Steven A Atlas; Jan N Basile; Aloysius B Cuyjet; Richard Dart; James V Felicetta; Richard H Grimm; L Julian Haywood; Syed Z A Jafri; Michael A Proschan; Udho Thadani; Paul K Whelton; Jackson T Wright
Journal:  Hypertension       Date:  2006-07-24       Impact factor: 10.190

7.  Outcomes in hypertensive patients at high cardiovascular risk treated with regimens based on valsartan or amlodipine: the VALUE randomised trial.

Authors:  Stevo Julius; Sverre E Kjeldsen; Michael Weber; Hans R Brunner; Steffan Ekman; Lennart Hansson; Tsushung Hua; John Laragh; Gordon T McInnes; Lada Mitchell; Francis Plat; Anthony Schork; Beverly Smith; Alberto Zanchetti
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2004-06-19       Impact factor: 79.321

8.  Intracerebral hemorrhage, cerebral infarction, and subdural hematoma after acute myocardial infarction and thrombolytic therapy in the Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction Study. Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction, Phase II, pilot and clinical trial.

Authors:  J M Gore; M Sloan; T R Price; A M Randall; E Bovill; D Collen; S Forman; G L Knatterud; G Sopko; M L Terrin
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1991-02       Impact factor: 29.690

9.  Post-marketing surveillance of lisinopril in general practice in the UK.

Authors:  J M Fallowfield; J Blenkinsopp; A Raza; A G Fowkes; T J Higgins; K M Bridgman
Journal:  Br J Clin Pract       Date:  1993 Nov-Dec

10.  The risk of myocardial infarction associated with antihypertensive drug therapies.

Authors:  B M Psaty; S R Heckbert; T D Koepsell; D S Siscovick; T E Raghunathan; N S Weiss; F R Rosendaal; R N Lemaitre; N L Smith; P W Wahl
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1995 Aug 23-30       Impact factor: 56.272

View more
  19 in total

1.  Systemic isradipine treatment diminishes calcium-dependent mitochondrial oxidant stress.

Authors:  Jaime N Guzman; Ema Ilijic; Ben Yang; Javier Sanchez-Padilla; David Wokosin; Dan Galtieri; Jyothisri Kondapalli; Paul T Schumacker; D James Surmeier
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  2018-04-30       Impact factor: 14.808

2.  Amlodipine induces vasodilation via Akt2/Sp1-activated miR-21 in smooth muscle cells.

Authors:  Qin Fang; Min Tian; Feng Wang; Zhihao Zhang; Tingyi Du; Wei Wang; Yong Yang; Xianqing Li; Guangzhi Chen; Lei Xiao; Haoran Wei; Yan Wang; Chen Chen; Dao Wen Wang
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  2019-05-20       Impact factor: 8.739

Review 3.  Efficacy of fixed-dose combination therapy in the treatment of patients with hypertension: focus on amlodipine/valsartan.

Authors:  Pedro Marques da Silva
Journal:  Clin Drug Investig       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 2.859

4.  Antihypertensive response to combination of olmesartan and amlodipine does not depend on method and time of drug administration.

Authors:  Francesco Rozza; Valentina Trimarco; Raffaele Izzo; Mario Santoro; Maria Virginia Manzi; Marina Marino; Gianfranco Di Renzo; Bruno Trimarco
Journal:  High Blood Press Cardiovasc Prev       Date:  2013-05-09

5.  Different aspects of sartan + calcium antagonist association compared to the single therapy on inflammation and metabolic parameters in hypertensive patients.

Authors:  Giuseppe Derosa; Arrigo F G Cicero; Anna Carbone; Fabrizio Querci; Elena Fogari; Angela D'Angelo; Pamela Maffioli
Journal:  Inflammation       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 4.092

6.  A Critical Review of Nebivolol and its Fixed-Dose Combinations in the Treatment of Hypertension.

Authors:  Arrigo F G Cicero; Masanari Kuwabara; Claudio Borghi
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2018-11       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 7.  Calcium and Parkinson's disease.

Authors:  D James Surmeier; Paul T Schumacker; Jaime D Guzman; Ema Ilijic; Ben Yang; Enrico Zampese
Journal:  Biochem Biophys Res Commun       Date:  2016-08-30       Impact factor: 3.575

Review 8.  Target- and mechanism-based therapeutics for neurodegenerative diseases: strength in numbers.

Authors:  Paul C Trippier; Kristin Jansen Labby; Dustin D Hawker; Jan J Mataka; Richard B Silverman
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  2013-03-27       Impact factor: 7.446

Review 9.  Olmesartan medoxomil/amlodipine.

Authors:  Mark Sanford; Susan J Keam
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 9.546

10.  Kinetic cell-based morphological screening: prediction of mechanism of compound action and off-target effects.

Authors:  Yama A Abassi; Biao Xi; Wenfu Zhang; Peifang Ye; Shelli L Kirstein; Michelle R Gaylord; Stuart C Feinstein; Xiaobo Wang; Xiao Xu
Journal:  Chem Biol       Date:  2009-07-31
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.