Literature DB >> 28508297

Adaptation to Stochastic Temporal Variations in Intratumoral Blood Flow: The Warburg Effect as a Bet Hedging Strategy.

Curtis A Gravenmier1, Miriam Siddique1, Robert A Gatenby2.   

Abstract

While most cancers promote ingrowth of host blood vessels, the resulting vascular network usually fails to develop a mature organization, resulting in abnormal vascular dynamics with stochastic variations that include slowing, cessation, and even reversal of flow. Thus, substantial spatial and temporal variations in oxygen concentration are commonly observed in most cancers. Cancer cells, like all living systems, are subject to Darwinian dynamics such that their survival and proliferation are dependent on developing optimal phenotypic adaptations to local environmental conditions. Here, we consider the environmental stresses placed on tumors subject to profound, frequent, but stochastic variations in oxygen concentration as a result of temporal variations in blood flow. While vascular fluctuations will undoubtedly affect local concentrations of a wide range of molecules including growth factors (e.g., estrogen), substrate (oxygen, glucose, etc.), and metabolites ([Formula: see text], we focus on the selection forces that result solely from stochastic fluctuations in oxygen concentration. The glucose metabolism of cancer cells has been investigated for decades following observations that malignant cells ferment glucose regardless of oxygen concentration, a condition termed the Warburg effect. In contrast, normal cells cease fermentation under aerobic conditions and this physiological response is termed the Pasteur effect. Fermentation is markedly inefficient compared to cellular respiration in terms of adenosine triphosphate (ATP) production, generating just 2 ATP/glucose, whereas respiration generates 38 ATP/glucose. This inefficiency requires cancer cells to increase glycolytic flux, which subsequently increases acid production and can significantly acidify local tissue. Hence, it initially appears that cancer cells adopt a disadvantageous metabolic phenotype. Indeed, this metabolic "hallmark" of cancer is termed "energy dysregulation." However, if cancers arise through an evolutionary optimization process, any common observed property must confer an adaptive advantage. In the present work, we investigate the hypothesis that aerobic glycolysis represents an adaptation to stochastic variations in oxygen concentration stemming from disordered intratumoral blood flow. Using mathematical models, we demonstrate that the Warburg effect evolves as a conservative metabolic bet hedging strategy in response to stochastic fluctuations of oxygen. Specifically, the Warburg effect sacrifices fitness in physoxia by diverting resources from the more efficient process of respiration, but preemptively adapts cells to hypoxia because fermentation produces ATP anaerobically. An environment with sufficiently stochastic fluctuations of oxygen will select for the bet hedging (Warburg) phenotype since it is modestly successful irrespective of oxygen concentration.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bet hedging; Intermittent hypoxia; Tumor metabolism; Warburg effect

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28508297      PMCID: PMC5685950          DOI: 10.1007/s11538-017-0261-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bull Math Biol        ISSN: 0092-8240            Impact factor:   1.758


  42 in total

1.  Interstitial pH and pO2 gradients in solid tumors in vivo: high-resolution measurements reveal a lack of correlation.

Authors:  G Helmlinger; F Yuan; M Dellian; R K Jain
Journal:  Nat Med       Date:  1997-02       Impact factor: 53.440

2.  Evidence for acutely hypoxic cells in mouse tumours, and a possible mechanism of reoxygenation.

Authors:  J M Brown
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  1979-08       Impact factor: 3.039

3.  Vascular endothelial growth factor induces tissue factor and matrix metalloproteinase production in endothelial cells: conversion of prothrombin to thrombin results in progelatinase A activation and cell proliferation.

Authors:  S Zucker; H Mirza; C E Conner; A F Lorenz; M H Drews; W F Bahou; J Jesty
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  1998-03-02       Impact factor: 7.396

Review 4.  Intra-tumour heterogeneity: a looking glass for cancer?

Authors:  Andriy Marusyk; Vanessa Almendro; Kornelia Polyak
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2012-04-19       Impact factor: 60.716

5.  Mathematical modelling of the Warburg effect in tumour cords.

Authors:  Sergey Astanin; Luigi Preziosi
Journal:  J Theor Biol       Date:  2009-02-14       Impact factor: 2.691

6.  Glioma-derived mutations in IDH1 dominantly inhibit IDH1 catalytic activity and induce HIF-1alpha.

Authors:  Shimin Zhao; Yan Lin; Wei Xu; Wenqing Jiang; Zhengyu Zha; Pu Wang; Wei Yu; Zhiqiang Li; Lingling Gong; Yingjie Peng; Jianping Ding; Qunying Lei; Kun-Liang Guan; Yue Xiong
Journal:  Science       Date:  2009-04-10       Impact factor: 47.728

7.  Early effects of phytohaemagglutinin on glucose metabolism of normal human lymphocytes.

Authors:  C J Hedeskov
Journal:  Biochem J       Date:  1968-11       Impact factor: 3.857

8.  Tumors exposed to acute cyclic hypoxic stress show enhanced angiogenesis, perfusion and metastatic dissemination.

Authors:  Einar K Rofstad; Jon-Vidar Gaustad; Tormod A M Egeland; Berit Mathiesen; Kanthi Galappathi
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2010-10-01       Impact factor: 7.396

9.  The pervasive presence of fluctuating oxygenation in tumors.

Authors:  Laura I Cárdenas-Navia; Daniel Mace; Rachel A Richardson; David F Wilson; Siqing Shan; Mark W Dewhirst
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2008-07-15       Impact factor: 12.701

10.  Plant water use affects competition for nitrogen: why drought favors invasive species in California.

Authors:  Katherine Everard; Eric W Seabloom; W Stanley Harpole; Claire de Mazancourt
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 3.926

View more
  10 in total

Review 1.  Applications of mechanistic modelling to clinical and experimental immunology: an emerging technology to accelerate immunotherapeutic discovery and development.

Authors:  L V Brown; E A Gaffney; J Wagg; M C Coles
Journal:  Clin Exp Immunol       Date:  2018-09       Impact factor: 4.330

Review 2.  Eco-evolutionary causes and consequences of temporal changes in intratumoural blood flow.

Authors:  Robert J Gillies; Joel S Brown; Alexander R A Anderson; Robert A Gatenby
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2018-09       Impact factor: 60.716

Review 3.  Roadmap on plasticity and epigenetics in cancer.

Authors:  Jasmine Foo; David Basanta; Russell C Rockne; Carly Strelez; Curran Shah; Kimya Ghaffarian; Shannon M Mumenthaler; Kelly Mitchell; Justin D Lathia; David Frankhouser; Sergio Branciamore; Ya-Huei Kuo; Guido Marcucci; Robert Vander Velde; Andriy Marusyk; Sui Huang; Kishore Hari; Mohit Kumar Jolly; Haralampos Hatzikirou; Kamrine E Poels; Mary E Spilker; Blerta Shtylla; Mark Robertson-Tessi; Alexander R A Anderson
Journal:  Phys Biol       Date:  2022-04-18       Impact factor: 2.959

Review 4.  Multiplicity of Mesenchymal Stromal Cells: Finding the Right Route to Therapy.

Authors:  Alison Wilson; Margeaux Hodgson-Garms; Jessica E Frith; Paul Genever
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2019-05-16       Impact factor: 7.561

5.  Evolutionary dynamics of competing phenotype-structured populations in periodically fluctuating environments.

Authors:  Aleksandra Ardaševa; Robert A Gatenby; Alexander R A Anderson; Helen M Byrne; Philip K Maini; Tommaso Lorenzi
Journal:  J Math Biol       Date:  2019-10-22       Impact factor: 2.259

6.  Evolutionary bet-hedging in structured populations.

Authors:  Christopher E Overton; Kieran J Sharkey
Journal:  J Math Biol       Date:  2021-04-01       Impact factor: 2.259

Review 7.  Group phenotypic composition in cancer.

Authors:  Jean-Pascal Capp; James DeGregori; Aurora M Nedelcu; Beata Ujvari; Andriy Marusyk; Robert Gatenby; Frédéric Thomas; Antoine M Dujon; Justine Boutry; Pascal Pujol; Catherine Alix-Panabières; Rodrigo Hamede; Benjamin Roche
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2021-03-30       Impact factor: 8.140

Review 8.  Scales of Cancer Evolution: Selfish Genome or Cooperating Cells?

Authors:  Branislav Brutovský
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-07-01       Impact factor: 6.575

9.  Integrative Analysis of Breast Cancer Cells Reveals an Epithelial-Mesenchymal Transition Role in Adaptation to Acidic Microenvironment.

Authors:  Mehdi Sadeghi; Bryce Ordway; Ilyia Rafiei; Punit Borad; Bin Fang; John L Koomen; Chaomei Zhang; Sean Yoder; Joseph Johnson; Mehdi Damaghi
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2020-03-10       Impact factor: 6.244

10.  Insights From the Ecology of Information to Cancer Control.

Authors:  Christopher J Whelan; Stanislav S Avdieiev; Robert A Gatenby
Journal:  Cancer Control       Date:  2020 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.302

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.