Michael T Treadway1, Roee Admon2, Amanda R Arulpragasam1, Malavika Mehta2, Samuel Douglas2, Gordana Vitaliano3, David P Olson3, Jessica A Cooper1, Diego A Pizzagalli4. 1. Department of Psychology, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia. 2. Center for Depression, Anxiety, and Stress Research, McLean Hospital/Harvard Medical School, Belmont, Massachusetts. 3. McLean Imaging Center, McLean Hospital/Harvard Medical School, Belmont, Massachusetts. 4. Center for Depression, Anxiety, and Stress Research, McLean Hospital/Harvard Medical School, Belmont, Massachusetts; McLean Imaging Center, McLean Hospital/Harvard Medical School, Belmont, Massachusetts. Electronic address: dap@mclean.harvard.edu.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Stress is widely known to alter behavioral responses to rewards and punishments. It is believed that stress may precipitate these changes through modulation of corticostriatal circuitry involved in reinforcement learning and motivation, although the intervening mechanisms remain unclear. One candidate is inflammation, which can rapidly increase following stress and can disrupt dopamine-dependent reward pathways. METHODS: Here, in a sample of 88 healthy female participants, we first assessed the effect of an acute laboratory stress paradigm on levels of plasma interleukin-6 (IL-6), a cytokine known to be both responsive to stress and elevated in depression. In a second laboratory session, we examined the effects of a second laboratory stress paradigm on reward prediction error (RPE) signaling in the ventral striatum. RESULTS: We show that individual differences in stress-induced increases in IL-6 (session 1) were associated with decreased ventral striatal RPE signaling during reinforcement learning (session 2), though there was no main effect of stress on RPE. Furthermore, changes in IL-6 following stress predicted intraindividual variability in perceived stress during a 4-month follow-up period. CONCLUSIONS: Taken together, these data identify a novel link between IL-6 and striatal RPEs during reinforcement learning in the context of acute psychological stress, as well as future appraisal of stressful life events.
BACKGROUND:Stress is widely known to alter behavioral responses to rewards and punishments. It is believed that stress may precipitate these changes through modulation of corticostriatal circuitry involved in reinforcement learning and motivation, although the intervening mechanisms remain unclear. One candidate is inflammation, which can rapidly increase following stress and can disrupt dopamine-dependent reward pathways. METHODS: Here, in a sample of 88 healthy female participants, we first assessed the effect of an acute laboratory stress paradigm on levels of plasma interleukin-6 (IL-6), a cytokine known to be both responsive to stress and elevated in depression. In a second laboratory session, we examined the effects of a second laboratory stress paradigm on reward prediction error (RPE) signaling in the ventral striatum. RESULTS: We show that individual differences in stress-induced increases in IL-6 (session 1) were associated with decreased ventral striatal RPE signaling during reinforcement learning (session 2), though there was no main effect of stress on RPE. Furthermore, changes in IL-6 following stress predicted intraindividual variability in perceived stress during a 4-month follow-up period. CONCLUSIONS: Taken together, these data identify a novel link between IL-6 and striatal RPEs during reinforcement learning in the context of acute psychological stress, as well as future appraisal of stressful life events.
Authors: Julienne E Bower; Patricia A Ganz; Najib Aziz; Richard Olmstead; Michael R Irwin; Steve W Cole Journal: Brain Behav Immun Date: 2006-09-27 Impact factor: 7.217
Authors: Maria Ironside; Roee Admon; Stephanie A Maddox; Malavika Mehta; Samuel Douglas; David P Olson; Diego A Pizzagalli Journal: Psychol Med Date: 2019-10-16 Impact factor: 7.723
Authors: Roee Admon; Michael T Treadway; Linda Valeri; Malavika Mehta; Samuel Douglas; Diego A Pizzagalli Journal: J Neurosci Date: 2017-07-24 Impact factor: 6.167
Authors: Michael Fritz; Anna M Klawonn; Qingyu Zhao; Edith V Sullivan; Natalie M Zahr; Adolf Pfefferbaum Journal: J Neuroimmunol Date: 2020-08-26 Impact factor: 3.478
Authors: Chloe C Boyle; Annette L Stanton; Naomi I Eisenberger; Teresa E Seeman; Julienne E Bower Journal: Brain Behav Immun Date: 2019-09-30 Impact factor: 7.217