Literature DB >> 28739584

Distinct Trajectories of Cortisol Response to Prolonged Acute Stress Are Linked to Affective Responses and Hippocampal Gray Matter Volume in Healthy Females.

Roee Admon1, Michael T Treadway2, Linda Valeri3, Malavika Mehta4, Samuel Douglas4, Diego A Pizzagalli5,6.   

Abstract

The development of robust laboratory procedures for acute stress induction over the last decades has greatly advanced our understanding of stress responses in humans and their underlying neurobiological mechanisms. Nevertheless, attempts to uncover linear relationships among endocrine, neural, and affective responses to stress have generally yielded inconsistent results. Here, 79 healthy females completed a well established laboratory procedure of acute stress induction that was modified to prolong its effect. Endocrinological and subjective affect assessments revealed stress-induced increases in cortisol release and negative affect that persisted 65 and 100 min after stress onset, respectively, confirming a relatively prolonged acute stress induction. Applying latent class linear mixed modeling on individuals' patterns of cortisol responses identified three distinct trajectories of cortisol response: the hyper-response (n = 10), moderate-response (n = 21), and mild-response (n = 48) groups. Notably, whereas all three groups exhibited a significant stress-induced increase in cortisol release and negative affect, the hyper-response and mild-response groups both reported more negative affect relative to the moderate-response group. Structural MRI revealed no group differences in hippocampal and amygdala volumes, yet a continuous measure of cortisol response (area under the curve) showed that high and low levels of stress-induced cortisol release were associated with less hippocampal gray matter volume compared with moderate cortisol release. Together, these results suggest that distinct trajectories of cortisol response to prolonged acute stress among healthy females may not be captured by conventional linear analyses; instead, quadratic relations may better describe links between cortisol response to stress and affective responses, as well as hippocampal structural variability.SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT Despite substantial research, it is unclear whether and how individual neuroendocrine stress response patterns are linked to affective responses to stress and structural variability in neuroendocrine regulatory brain regions. By applying latent class linear mixed modeling on individuals' patterns of cortisol responses to a prolonged acute stressor, we identified three distinct trajectories of cortisol response. Relative to the group showing a moderate cortisol response, groups characterized by hyper and mild cortisol response were both associated with more negative affect. Moreover, a continuous measure of cortisol response showed that high and low levels of stress-induced cortisol release correlated with reduced hippocampal gray matter volume. Given that neuroendocrine stress responses are conceptualized as biomarkers of stress susceptibility, these insights may have clinical implications.
Copyright © 2017 the authors 0270-6474/17/377995-09$15.00/0.

Entities:  

Keywords:  HPA; cortisol; hippocampus; mood; stress

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28739584      PMCID: PMC5559768          DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1175-17.2017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci        ISSN: 0270-6474            Impact factor:   6.167


  36 in total

Review 1.  Stress and hippocampal plasticity.

Authors:  B S McEwen
Journal:  Annu Rev Neurosci       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 12.449

2.  Chronic 'jet lag' produces temporal lobe atrophy and spatial cognitive deficits.

Authors:  K Cho
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 24.884

3.  Regression models for the analysis of longitudinal Gaussian data from multiple sources.

Authors:  Liam M O'Brien; Garrett M Fitzmaurice
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2005-06-15       Impact factor: 2.373

4.  The associations among hippocampal volume, cortisol reactivity, and memory performance in healthy young men.

Authors:  Marita Pruessner; Jens C Pruessner; Dirk H Hellhammer; G Bruce Pike; Sonia J Lupien
Journal:  Psychiatry Res       Date:  2007-03-28       Impact factor: 3.222

5.  Stress reactivity and corticolimbic response to emotional faces in adolescents.

Authors:  Jie Liu; Tara M Chaplin; Fei Wang; Rajita Sinha; Linda C Mayes; Hilary P Blumberg
Journal:  J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry       Date:  2012-02-01       Impact factor: 8.829

Review 6.  Effects of chronic stress on structure and cell function in rat hippocampus and hypothalamus.

Authors:  Marian Joëls; Henk Karst; Deborah Alfarez; Vivi M Heine; Yongjun Qin; Els van Riel; Martin Verkuyl; Paul J Lucassen; Harm J Krugers
Journal:  Stress       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 3.493

Review 7.  A developmentally informed perspective on the relation between stress and psychopathology: when the problem with stress is that there is not enough.

Authors:  Richard T Liu
Journal:  J Abnorm Psychol       Date:  2015-02

8.  Trauma exposure relates to heightened stress, altered amygdala morphology and deficient extinction learning: Implications for psychopathology.

Authors:  Raffaele Cacciaglia; Frauke Nees; Oliver Grimm; Stephanie Ridder; Sebastian T Pohlack; Slawomira J Diener; Claudia Liebscher; Herta Flor
Journal:  Psychoneuroendocrinology       Date:  2016-11-11       Impact factor: 4.905

9.  Altered cortisol response to psychologic stress in breast cancer survivors with persistent fatigue.

Authors:  Julienne E Bower; Patricia A Ganz; Najib Aziz
Journal:  Psychosom Med       Date:  2005 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 4.312

10.  Bilateral hippocampal volume reduction in adults with post-traumatic stress disorder: a meta-analysis of structural MRI studies.

Authors:  Michael E Smith
Journal:  Hippocampus       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 3.899

View more
  6 in total

1.  Inflammation and depressive phenotypes: evidence from medical records from over 12 000 patients and brain morphology.

Authors:  Maria Ironside; Roee Admon; Stephanie A Maddox; Malavika Mehta; Samuel Douglas; David P Olson; Diego A Pizzagalli
Journal:  Psychol Med       Date:  2019-10-16       Impact factor: 7.723

Review 2.  Complicated Role of Exercise in Modulating Memory: A Discussion of the Mechanisms Involved.

Authors:  Mahshid Ebrahimnejad; Paniz Azizi; Vahide Alipour; Mohammad-Reza Zarrindast; Salar Vaseghi
Journal:  Neurochem Res       Date:  2022-02-23       Impact factor: 3.996

Review 3.  Neurobiological mechanisms underlying sex-related differences in stress-related disorders: Effects of neuroactive steroids on the hippocampus.

Authors:  Katharina M Hillerer; David A Slattery; Belinda Pletzer
Journal:  Front Neuroendocrinol       Date:  2019-09-30       Impact factor: 8.606

4.  Depression genetic risk score is associated with anhedonia-related markers across units of analysis.

Authors:  Guia Guffanti; Poornima Kumar; Roee Admon; Michael T Treadway; Mei H Hall; Malavika Mehta; Samuel Douglas; Amanda R Arulpragasam; Diego A Pizzagalli
Journal:  Transl Psychiatry       Date:  2019-09-19       Impact factor: 6.222

5.  Sex-specific neural responses to acute psychosocial stress in depression.

Authors:  Daifeng Dong; Maria Ironside; Emily L Belleau; Xiaoqiang Sun; Chang Cheng; Ge Xiong; Lisa D Nickerson; Xiang Wang; Shuqiao Yao; Diego A Pizzagalli
Journal:  Transl Psychiatry       Date:  2022-01-10       Impact factor: 6.222

6.  Physical Activity versus Psychological Stress: Effects on Salivary Cortisol and Working Memory Performance.

Authors:  Pamela Ponce; Alberto Del Arco; Paul Loprinzi
Journal:  Medicina (Kaunas)       Date:  2019-04-30       Impact factor: 2.430

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.