Literature DB >> 34510934

Upper Limb Performance in Daily Life Approaches Plateau Around Three to Six Weeks Post-stroke.

Catherine E Lang1,2,3, Kimberly J Waddell1, Jessica Barth1, Carey L Holleran1,3, Michael J Strube4, Marghuretta D Bland1,2,3.   

Abstract

Background. Wearable sensors allow for direct measurement of upper limb (UL) performance in daily life. Objective. To map the trajectory of UL performance and its relationships to other factors post-stroke. Methods. Participants (n = 67) with first stroke and UL paresis were assessed at 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24 weeks after stroke. Assessments captured UL impairment (Fugl-Meyer), capacity for activity (Action Research Arm Test), and performance of activity in daily life (accelerometer variables of use ratio and hours of paretic limb activity), along with other potential modifying factors. We modeled individual trajectories of change for each measurement level and the moderating effects on UL performance trajectories. Results. Individual trajectories were best fit with a 3-parameter logistic model, capturing the rapid growth early after stroke within the longer data collection period. Plateaus (90% of asymptote) in impairment (bootstrap mean ± SE: 32 ± 4 days post-stroke) preceded those in capacity (41 ± 4 days). Plateau in performance, as measured by the use ratio (24 ± 5 days), tended to precede plateaus in impairment and capacity. Plateau in performance, as measured by hours of paretic activity (41 ± 6 days), occurred at a similar time to that of capacity and slightly lagged impairment. Modifiers of performance trajectories were capacity, concordance, UL rehabilitation, depressive symptomatology, and cognition. Conclusions. Upper limb performance in daily life approached plateau 3 to 6 weeks post-stroke. Individuals with stroke started to achieve a stable pattern of UL use in daily life early, often before neurological impairments and functional capacity started to stabilize.

Entities:  

Keywords:  outcome assessment; recovery; rehabilitation; stroke; upper extremity

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34510934      PMCID: PMC8442937          DOI: 10.1177/15459683211041302

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurorehabil Neural Repair        ISSN: 1545-9683            Impact factor:   4.895


  49 in total

1.  Bootstrap confidence intervals: when, which, what? A practical guide for medical statisticians.

Authors:  J Carpenter; J Bithell
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2000-05-15       Impact factor: 2.373

Review 2.  Understanding the pattern of functional recovery after stroke: facts and theories.

Authors:  Gert Kwakkel; Boudewijn Kollen; Eline Lindeman
Journal:  Restor Neurol Neurosci       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 2.406

3.  Predicting daily use of the affected upper extremity 1 year after stroke.

Authors:  Debbie Rand; Janice J Eng
Journal:  J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis       Date:  2014-12-18       Impact factor: 2.136

4.  Standardized Measurement of Sensorimotor Recovery in Stroke Trials: Consensus-Based Core Recommendations from the Stroke Recovery and Rehabilitation Roundtable.

Authors:  Gert Kwakkel; Natasha A Lannin; Karen Borschmann; Coralie English; Myzoon Ali; Leonid Churilov; Gustavo Saposnik; Carolee Winstein; Erwin E H van Wegen; Steven L Wolf; John W Krakauer; Julie Bernhardt
Journal:  Neurorehabil Neural Repair       Date:  2017-09       Impact factor: 3.919

5.  Factors influencing paretic upper limb use during first four-weeks post-stroke: a cross-sectional accelerometry study.

Authors:  Lay Fong Chin; Kathryn Hayward; Sandra G Brauer
Journal:  Am J Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2020-07-22       Impact factor: 2.159

Review 6.  Translating what we have learned into practice. Principles and hypotheses for interventions addressing multiple behaviors in primary care.

Authors:  Russell E Glasgow; Michael G Goldstein; Judith K Ockene; Nicolaas P Pronk
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 5.043

Review 7.  Guidelines for Adult Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery: A Guideline for Healthcare Professionals From the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association.

Authors:  Carolee J Winstein; Joel Stein; Ross Arena; Barbara Bates; Leora R Cherney; Steven C Cramer; Frank Deruyter; Janice J Eng; Beth Fisher; Richard L Harvey; Catherine E Lang; Marilyn MacKay-Lyons; Kenneth J Ottenbacher; Sue Pugh; Mathew J Reeves; Lorie G Richards; William Stiers; Richard D Zorowitz
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2016-05-04       Impact factor: 7.914

8.  Validity of body-worn sensor acceleration metrics to index upper extremity function in hemiparetic stroke.

Authors:  M A Urbin; Ryan R Bailey; Catherine E Lang
Journal:  J Neurol Phys Ther       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 4.655

9.  An exploratory analysis of the self-reported goals of individuals with chronic upper-extremity paresis following stroke.

Authors:  Kimberly J Waddell; Rebecca L Birkenmeier; Marghuretta D Bland; Catherine E Lang
Journal:  Disabil Rehabil       Date:  2015-07-06       Impact factor: 2.439

View more
  3 in total

1.  The impact of closed-loop intracortical stimulation on neural activity in brain-injured, anesthetized animals.

Authors:  Marta Carè; Alberto Averna; David J Guggenmos; Michela Chiappalone; Federico Barban; Marianna Semprini; Lorenzo De Michieli; Randolph J Nudo
Journal:  Bioelectron Med       Date:  2022-02-28

2.  Sensor-based categorization of upper limb performance in daily life of persons with and without neurological upper limb deficits.

Authors:  Jessica Barth; Keith R Lohse; Jeffrey D Konrad; Marghuertta D Bland; Catherine E Lang
Journal:  Front Rehabil Sci       Date:  2021-10-20

3.  Classification of functional and non-functional arm use by inertial measurement units in individuals with upper limb impairment after stroke.

Authors:  Johannes Pohl; Alain Ryser; Janne Marieke Veerbeek; Geert Verheyden; Julia Elisabeth Vogt; Andreas Rüdiger Luft; Chris Awai Easthope
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2022-09-28       Impact factor: 4.755

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.