Robert L Herrick1, Jeanette Buckholz1, Frank M Biro2, Antonia M Calafat3, Xiaoyun Ye3, Changchun Xie1, Susan M Pinney4. 1. University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Department of Environmental Health, Cincinnati, OH, United States. 2. Division of Adolescent Medicine, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH, United States. 3. Division of Laboratory Sciences, National Center for Environmental Health, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, United States. 4. University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Department of Environmental Health, Cincinnati, OH, United States. Electronic address: pinneysm@ucmail.uc.edu.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Industrial discharges of perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA) to the Ohio River, contaminating water systems near Parkersburg, WV, were previously associated with nearby residents' serum PFOA concentrations above US general population medians. Ohio River PFOA concentrations downstream are elevated, suggesting Mid-Ohio River Valley residents are exposed through drinking water. OBJECTIVES: Quantify PFOA and 10 other per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) in Mid-Ohio River Valley resident sera collected between 1991 and 2013 and determine whether the Ohio River and Ohio River Aquifer are exposure sources. METHODS: We measured eleven PFAS in 1608 sera from 931 participants. Serum PFOA concentration and water source associations were assessed using linear mixed-effects models. We estimated between-sample serum PFOA using one-compartment pharmacokinetics for participants with multiple samples. RESULTS: In serum samples collected as early as 1991, PFOA (median = 7.6 ng/mL) was detected in 99.9% of sera; 47% had concentrations greater than US population 95th percentiles. Five other PFAS were detected in greater than 82% of samples; median other PFAS concentrations were similar to the US general population. Serum PFOA was significantly associated with water source, sampling year, age at sampling, tap water consumption, pregnancy, gravidity and breastfeeding. Serum PFOA was 40-60% lower with granular activated carbon (GAC) use. Repeated measurements and pharmacokinetics suggest serum PFOA peaked 2000-2006 for participants using water without GAC treatment; where GAC was used, serum PFOA concentrations decreased from 1991 to 2012. CONCLUSIONS: Mid-Ohio River Valley residents appear to have PFOA, but not other PFAS, serum concentrations above US population levels. Drinking water from the Ohio River and Ohio River Aquifer, primarily contaminated by industrial discharges 209-666 km upstream, is likely the primary exposure source. GAC treatment of drinking water mitigates, but does not eliminate, PFOA exposure.
BACKGROUND: Industrial discharges of perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA) to the Ohio River, contaminating water systems near Parkersburg, WV, were previously associated with nearby residents' serum PFOA concentrations above US general population medians. Ohio River PFOA concentrations downstream are elevated, suggesting Mid-Ohio River Valley residents are exposed through drinking water. OBJECTIVES: Quantify PFOA and 10 other per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) in Mid-Ohio River Valley resident sera collected between 1991 and 2013 and determine whether the Ohio River and Ohio River Aquifer are exposure sources. METHODS: We measured eleven PFAS in 1608 sera from 931 participants. Serum PFOA concentration and water source associations were assessed using linear mixed-effects models. We estimated between-sample serum PFOA using one-compartment pharmacokinetics for participants with multiple samples. RESULTS: In serum samples collected as early as 1991, PFOA (median = 7.6 ng/mL) was detected in 99.9% of sera; 47% had concentrations greater than US population 95th percentiles. Five other PFAS were detected in greater than 82% of samples; median other PFAS concentrations were similar to the US general population. Serum PFOA was significantly associated with water source, sampling year, age at sampling, tapwater consumption, pregnancy, gravidity and breastfeeding. Serum PFOA was 40-60% lower with granular activated carbon (GAC) use. Repeated measurements and pharmacokinetics suggest serum PFOA peaked 2000-2006 for participants using water without GAC treatment; where GAC was used, serum PFOA concentrations decreased from 1991 to 2012. CONCLUSIONS: Mid-Ohio River Valley residents appear to have PFOA, but not other PFAS, serum concentrations above US population levels. Drinking water from the Ohio River and Ohio River Aquifer, primarily contaminated by industrial discharges 209-666 km upstream, is likely the primary exposure source. GAC treatment of drinking water mitigates, but does not eliminate, PFOA exposure.
Authors: Carin A Huset; Aurea C Chiaia; Douglas F Barofsky; Niels Jonkers; Hans-Peter E Kohler; Christoph Ort; D Walter Giger; Jennifer A Field Journal: Environ Sci Technol Date: 2008-09-01 Impact factor: 9.028
Authors: Scott M Bartell; Antonia M Calafat; Christopher Lyu; Kayoko Kato; P Barry Ryan; Kyle Steenland Journal: Environ Health Perspect Date: 2010-02 Impact factor: 9.031
Authors: Stephanie J Frisbee; A Paul Brooks; Arthur Maher; Patsy Flensborg; Susan Arnold; Tony Fletcher; Kyle Steenland; Anoop Shankar; Sarah S Knox; Cecil Pollard; Joel A Halverson; Verónica M Vieira; Chuanfang Jin; Kevin M Leyden; Alan M Ducatman Journal: Environ Health Perspect Date: 2009-07-13 Impact factor: 9.031
Authors: Samantha L Kingsley; Melissa N Eliot; Karl T Kelsey; Antonia M Calafat; Shelley Ehrlich; Bruce P Lanphear; Aimin Chen; Joseph M Braun Journal: Environ Res Date: 2018-05-07 Impact factor: 6.498
Authors: Kelsey E Barton; Anne P Starling; Christopher P Higgins; Carrie A McDonough; Antonia M Calafat; John L Adgate Journal: Int J Hyg Environ Health Date: 2019-08-20 Impact factor: 5.840
Authors: Courtney M Giannini; Robert L Herrick; Jeanette M Buckholz; Alex R Daniels; Frank M Biro; Susan M Pinney Journal: Int J Hyg Environ Health Date: 2018-07-17 Impact factor: 5.840
Authors: S M Pinney; G C Windham; C Xie; R L Herrick; A M Calafat; K McWhorter; C S Fassler; R A Hiatt; L H Kushi; F M Biro Journal: Int J Hyg Environ Health Date: 2019-07-09 Impact factor: 5.840
Authors: Lauren A Wise; Amelia K Wesselink; Samantha Schildroth; Antonia M Calafat; Traci N Bethea; Ruth J Geller; Chad M Coleman; Victoria Fruh; Birgit Claus Henn; Julianne C Botelho; Quaker E Harmon; Maya Thirkill; Ganesa R Wegienka; Donna D Baird Journal: Environ Res Date: 2021-08-14 Impact factor: 6.498
Authors: Ann M Vuong; Glenys M Webster; Kimberly Yolton; Antonia M Calafat; Gina Muckle; Bruce P Lanphear; Aimin Chen Journal: Environ Res Date: 2021-02-02 Impact factor: 6.498