Kiarri N Kershaw1, Whitney R Robinson2, Penny Gordon-Larsen3, Margaret T Hicken4, David C Goff5, Mercedes R Carnethon1, Catarina I Kiefe6, Stephen Sidney7, Ana V Diez Roux8. 1. Department of Preventive Medicine, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois. 2. Department of Epidemiology, University of North Carolina Gillings School of Public Health, Chapel Hill. 3. Department of Nutrition, University of North Carolina Gillings School of Public Health, Chapel Hill. 4. Institute for Social Research, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor. 5. Department of Epidemiology, Colorado School of Public Health, Aurora. 6. Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester. 7. Division of Research, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland. 8. Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Drexel University Dornsife School of Public Health, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Abstract
Importance: Despite cross-sectional evidence linking racial residential segregation to hypertension prevalence among non-Hispanic blacks, it remains unclear how changes in exposure to neighborhood segregation may be associated with changes in blood pressure. Objective: To examine the association of changes in neighborhood-level racial residential segregation with changes in systolic and diastolic blood pressure over a 25-year period. Design, Setting, and Participants: This observational study examined longitudinal data of 2280 black participants of the Coronary Artery Risk Development in Young Adults (CARDIA) study, a prospective investigation of adults aged 18 to 30 years who underwent baseline examinations in field centers in 4 US locations from March 25, 1985, to June 7, 1986, and then were re-examined for the next 25 years. Racial residential segregation was assessed using the Getis-Ord Gi* statistic, a measure of SD between the neighborhood's racial composition (ie, percentage of black residents) and the surrounding area's racial composition. Segregation was categorized as high (Gi* >1.96), medium (Gi* 0-1.96), and low (Gi* <0). Fixed-effects linear regression modeling was used to estimate the associations of within-person change in exposure to segregation and within-person change in blood pressure while tightly controlling for time-invariant confounders. Data analyses were performed between August 4, 2016, and February 9, 2017. Main Outcomes and Measures: Within-person changes in systolic and diastolic blood pressure across 6 examinations over 25 years. Results: Of the 2280 participants at baseline, 974 (42.7%) were men and 1306 (57.3%) were women. Of these, 1861 (81.6%) were living in a high-segregation neighborhood; 278 (12.2%), a medium-segregation neighborhood; and 141 (6.2%), a low-segregation neighborhood. Systolic blood pressure increased by a mean of 0.16 (95% CI, 0.06-0.26) mm Hg with each 1-SD increase in segregation score after adjusting for interactions of time with age, sex, and field center. Of the 1861 participants (81.6%) who lived in high-segregation neighborhoods at baseline, reductions in exposure to segregation were associated with reductions in systolic blood pressure. Mean differences in systolic blood pressure were -1.33 (95% CI, -2.26 to -0.40) mm Hg when comparing high-segregation with medium-segregation neighborhoods and -1.19 (95% CI, -2.08 to -0.31) mm Hg when comparing high-segregation with low-segregation neighborhoods after adjustment for time and interactions of time with baseline age, sex, and field center. Changes in segregation were not associated with changes in diastolic blood pressure. Conclusions and Relevance: Decreases in exposure to racial residential segregation are associated with reductions in systolic blood pressure. This study adds to the small but growing body of evidence that policies that reduce segregation may have meaningful health benefits.
Importance: Despite cross-sectional evidence linking racial residential segregation to hypertension prevalence among non-Hispanic blacks, it remains unclear how changes in exposure to neighborhood segregation may be associated with changes in blood pressure. Objective: To examine the association of changes in neighborhood-level racial residential segregation with changes in systolic and diastolic blood pressure over a 25-year period. Design, Setting, and Participants: This observational study examined longitudinal data of 2280 black participants of the Coronary Artery Risk Development in Young Adults (CARDIA) study, a prospective investigation of adults aged 18 to 30 years who underwent baseline examinations in field centers in 4 US locations from March 25, 1985, to June 7, 1986, and then were re-examined for the next 25 years. Racial residential segregation was assessed using the Getis-Ord Gi* statistic, a measure of SD between the neighborhood's racial composition (ie, percentage of black residents) and the surrounding area's racial composition. Segregation was categorized as high (Gi* >1.96), medium (Gi* 0-1.96), and low (Gi* <0). Fixed-effects linear regression modeling was used to estimate the associations of within-person change in exposure to segregation and within-person change in blood pressure while tightly controlling for time-invariant confounders. Data analyses were performed between August 4, 2016, and February 9, 2017. Main Outcomes and Measures: Within-person changes in systolic and diastolic blood pressure across 6 examinations over 25 years. Results: Of the 2280 participants at baseline, 974 (42.7%) were men and 1306 (57.3%) were women. Of these, 1861 (81.6%) were living in a high-segregation neighborhood; 278 (12.2%), a medium-segregation neighborhood; and 141 (6.2%), a low-segregation neighborhood. Systolic blood pressure increased by a mean of 0.16 (95% CI, 0.06-0.26) mm Hg with each 1-SD increase in segregation score after adjusting for interactions of time with age, sex, and field center. Of the 1861 participants (81.6%) who lived in high-segregation neighborhoods at baseline, reductions in exposure to segregation were associated with reductions in systolic blood pressure. Mean differences in systolic blood pressure were -1.33 (95% CI, -2.26 to -0.40) mm Hg when comparing high-segregation with medium-segregation neighborhoods and -1.19 (95% CI, -2.08 to -0.31) mm Hg when comparing high-segregation with low-segregation neighborhoods after adjustment for time and interactions of time with baseline age, sex, and field center. Changes in segregation were not associated with changes in diastolic blood pressure. Conclusions and Relevance: Decreases in exposure to racial residential segregation are associated with reductions in systolic blood pressure. This study adds to the small but growing body of evidence that policies that reduce segregation may have meaningful health benefits.
Authors: David R Jacobs; Hiroshi Yatsuya; Mary O Hearst; Bharat Thyagarajan; Ravi Kalhan; Sharon Rosenberg; Lewis J Smith; R Graham Barr; Daniel A Duprez Journal: Hypertension Date: 2011-12-27 Impact factor: 10.190
Authors: Kiarri N Kershaw; Theresa L Osypuk; D Phuong Do; Peter J De Chavez; Ana V Diez Roux Journal: Circulation Date: 2014-12-01 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Mahasin S Mujahid; Ana V Diez Roux; Jeffrey D Morenoff; Trivellore E Raghunathan; Richard S Cooper; Hanyu Ni; Steven Shea Journal: Epidemiology Date: 2008-07 Impact factor: 4.822
Authors: G D Friedman; G R Cutter; R P Donahue; G H Hughes; S B Hulley; D R Jacobs; K Liu; P J Savage Journal: J Clin Epidemiol Date: 1988 Impact factor: 6.437
Authors: Shakia T Hardy; Laura R Loehr; Kenneth R Butler; Sujatro Chakladar; Patricia P Chang; Aaron R Folsom; Gerardo Heiss; Richard F MacLehose; Kunihiro Matsushita; Christy L Avery Journal: J Am Heart Assoc Date: 2015-10-27 Impact factor: 5.501
Authors: Hong-Van Tieu; Beryl A Koblin; Carl Latkin; Frank C Curriero; Emily R Greene; Andrew Rundle; Victoria Frye Journal: J Urban Health Date: 2020-10 Impact factor: 3.671
Authors: Stephanie L Mayne; Margaret T Hicken; Sharon Stein Merkin; Teresa E Seeman; Kiarri N Kershaw; D Phuong Do; Anjum Hajat; Ana V Diez Roux Journal: J Epidemiol Community Health Date: 2018-09-29 Impact factor: 3.710
Authors: Sophie E Claudel; Joel Adu-Brimpong; Alnesha Banks; Colby Ayers; Michelle A Albert; Sandeep R Das; James A de Lemos; Tammy Leonard; Ian J Neeland; Joshua P Rivers; Tiffany M Powell-Wiley Journal: Am Heart J Date: 2018-08-06 Impact factor: 4.749
Authors: Xu Zhang; Kiarri N Kershaw; Caterina P Minniti; Andrew Campbell; Sohail R Rana; Deepika S Darbari; Lori Luchtman-Jones; Craig Sable; Niti Dham; Gregory Ensing; Manuel Arteta; James G Taylor; Lewis L Hsu; Sergei Nekhai; Victor R Gordeuk Journal: Blood Adv Date: 2020-07-28
Authors: Sidra N Bonner; Cheryl Clark; Nancy L Keating; Elena M Kouri; Rachel A Freedman Journal: Clin Breast Cancer Date: 2018-12-08 Impact factor: 3.225
Authors: Gabriel S Tajeu; Monika M Safford; George Howard; Virginia J Howard; Ligong Chen; D Leann Long; Rikki M Tanner; Paul Muntner Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2020-03-19 Impact factor: 9.308