Literature DB >> 28505273

Factor Analysis of an Expanded Halstead-Reitan Battery and the Structure of Neurocognition.

Virginie M Patt1,2, Gregory G Brown1,3, Michael L Thomas1, Scott C Roesch4, Michael J Taylor1, Robert K Heaton1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The structure of neurocognition is explored by examining the neurocognitive domains underlying comprehensive neuropsychological assessment of cognitively healthy individuals.
METHOD: Exploratory factor analysis was conducted on the adult normative dataset of an expanded Halstead-Reitan Battery (eHRB), comprising Caucasian and African American participants. The factor structure contributions of the original HRB, eHRB expansion, and Wechsler intelligence scales were compared. Demographic effects were examined on composite factor scores calculated using confirmatory factor analysis.
RESULTS: The full eHRB had an eight-factor structure, with latent constructs including: 'working memory', 'fluency', 'verbal episodic memory', 'visuospatial cognition' (visuospatial memory and problem solving), 'perceptual-motor speed' (speed for processing visual/tactile material and hand-motor execution), 'perceptual attention' (attention to sensory-perceptual information), 'semantic knowledge' (knowledge acquired through education and culturally-based experiences), and 'phonological decoding' (grapheme-phoneme processing essential for sounding-out words). 'Perceptual-motor speed' and 'perceptual attention' were most negatively associated with age, whereas 'semantic knowledge' and 'phonological decoding' were most resistant to aging. 'Semantic knowledge' showed the greatest dependence on demographic background, including education and ethnicity. Gender differences in cognitive performances were negligible across all domains except 'phonological decoding' with women slightly outperforming men. The original HRB contributed four neurocognitive domains, the eHRB expansion three domains, and the Wechsler scales one additional domain but with restructuring of verbal factors.
CONCLUSION: Eight neurocognitive domains underlie performance of healthy cognitive individuals during comprehensive neuropsychological assessment. These domains serve as framework for understanding the constructs measured by commonly-used neuropsychological tests and may represent the structure of neurocognition.
© The Author 2017. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Demographic effects; Dyslexia; Factor analysis; Halstead-Reitan Battery; Neuropsychological assessment

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 28505273      PMCID: PMC5860522          DOI: 10.1093/arclin/acx043

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Clin Neuropsychol        ISSN: 0887-6177            Impact factor:   2.813


  50 in total

1.  Lessons on measuring construct validity: a commentary on Delis, Jacobson, Bondi, Hamilton, And Salmon.

Authors:  Glenn J Larrabee
Journal:  J Int Neuropsychol Soc       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 2.892

2.  ABILITY FACTORS AND ENVIRONMENTAL INFLUENCES.

Authors:  P E VERNON
Journal:  Am Psychol       Date:  1965-09

3.  Phonological processing skills and deficits in adult dyslexics.

Authors:  B F Pennington; G C Van Orden; S D Smith; P A Green; M M Haith
Journal:  Child Dev       Date:  1990-12

Review 4.  The gender similarities hypothesis.

Authors:  Janet Shibley Hyde
Journal:  Am Psychol       Date:  2005-09

5.  Role of frontal versus temporal cortex in verbal fluency as revealed by voxel-based lesion symptom mapping.

Authors:  Juliana V Baldo; Sophie Schwartz; David Wilkins; Nina F Dronkers
Journal:  J Int Neuropsychol Soc       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 2.892

6.  Chronic neurological sequelae of acute organophosphate pesticide poisoning.

Authors:  E P Savage; T J Keefe; L M Mounce; R K Heaton; J A Lewis; P J Burcar
Journal:  Arch Environ Health       Date:  1988 Jan-Feb

7.  Evidence that IQ scores are irrelevant to the definition and analysis of reading disability.

Authors:  L S Siegel
Journal:  Can J Psychol       Date:  1988-06

8.  Factor analysis of the Revised Wechsler Memory Scale tests in a neuropsychological battery.

Authors:  E W Russell
Journal:  Percept Mot Skills       Date:  1982-06

9.  The myth of testing construct validity using factor analysis or correlations with normal or mixed clinical populations: lessons from memory assessment.

Authors:  Dean C Delis; Mark Jacobson; Mark W Bondi; Joanne M Hamilton; David P Salmon
Journal:  J Int Neuropsychol Soc       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 2.892

10.  A multifactor model of the Halstead-Reitan Neuropsychological Test Battery and its relationship to cognitive status and psychiatric diagnosis.

Authors:  P C Fowler; E Zillmer; A C Newman
Journal:  J Clin Psychol       Date:  1988-11
View more
  3 in total

1.  A signal detection-item response theory model for evaluating neuropsychological measures.

Authors:  Michael L Thomas; Gregory G Brown; Ruben C Gur; Tyler M Moore; Virginie M Patt; Victoria B Risbrough; Dewleen G Baker
Journal:  J Clin Exp Neuropsychol       Date:  2018-02-05       Impact factor: 2.475

2.  What is the optimal neuropsychological test battery for schizophrenia in China?

Authors:  Chuan Shi; Lan Kang; Shuqiao Yao; Yibin Ma; Tao Li; Ying Liang; Zhang Cheng; Yifeng Xu; Jianguo Shi; Xiufeng Xu; Congpei Zhang; Donald R Franklin; Robert K Heaton; Hua Jin; Xin Yu
Journal:  Schizophr Res       Date:  2019-02-01       Impact factor: 4.939

3.  Comparison of factor analysis models applied to the NCANDA neuropsychological test battery.

Authors:  Kevin M Cummins; Eileen V Pitpitan; Ty Brumback; Tyler M Moore; Ryan S Trim; Duncan B Clark; Sandra A Brown; Susan F Tapert
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-02-10       Impact factor: 3.240

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.