Literature DB >> 28504528

The importance of arousal for variation in working memory capacity and attention control: A latent variable pupillometry study.

Nash Unsworth1, Matthew K Robison1.   

Abstract

A great deal of prior research has examined the relation between working memory capacity (WMC) and attention control. The current study explored the role of arousal in individual differences in WMC and attention control. Participants performed multiple WMC and attention control tasks. During the attention control tasks participants were periodically probed regarding their current attentional state and both baseline and task-evoked pupillary responses were recorded as indicators of tonic arousal and phasic arousal because of attentional effort, respectively. Latent variable analyses demonstrated that variability in both baseline pupil diameter and task-evoked responses was related to WMC, attention control, and off-task thinking. Furthermore, structural equation models suggested that variability in both baseline pupil diameter and task-evoked pupillary responses predicted off-task thinking, which in turn predicted variation in WMC and attention control. These results provide important evidence linking moment-to-moment fluctuations in arousal to individual differences in WMC and attention control. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2017 APA, all rights reserved).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28504528     DOI: 10.1037/xlm0000421

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn        ISSN: 0278-7393            Impact factor:   3.051


  26 in total

1.  Putting effort into infant cognition.

Authors:  Zsuzsa Kaldy; Erik Blaser
Journal:  Curr Dir Psychol Sci       Date:  2020-02-27

2.  Tracking arousal state and mind wandering with pupillometry.

Authors:  Nash Unsworth; Matthew K Robison
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2018-08       Impact factor: 3.282

3.  The validity of the online thought-probing procedure of mind wandering is not threatened by variations of probe rate and probe framing.

Authors:  Anna-Lena Schubert; Gidon T Frischkorn; Jan Rummel
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2019-05-02

Review 4.  A locus coeruleus-norepinephrine account of individual differences in working memory capacity and attention control.

Authors:  Nash Unsworth; Matthew K Robison
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2017-08

5.  Individual differences in baseline oculometrics: Examining variation in baseline pupil diameter, spontaneous eye blink rate, and fixation stability.

Authors:  Nash Unsworth; Matthew K Robison; Ashley L Miller
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2019-08       Impact factor: 3.282

6.  The wandering mind oscillates: EEG alpha power is enhanced during moments of mind-wandering.

Authors:  Rebecca J Compton; Dylan Gearinger; Hannah Wild
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2019-10       Impact factor: 3.282

7.  Individual differences in working memory capacity and the regulation of arousal.

Authors:  Matthew K Robison; Gene A Brewer
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2020-10       Impact factor: 2.199

8.  Ocular signatures of proactive versus reactive cognitive control in young adults.

Authors:  Verónica Mäki-Marttunen; Thomas Hagen; Samira Aminihajibashi; Maja Foldal; Maria Stavrinou; Jens H Halvorsen; Bruno Laeng; Thomas Espeseth
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 3.282

9.  The effect of binaural beat stimulation on sustained attention.

Authors:  Matthew K Robison; Mohitha Obulasetty; Chris Blais; Kimberly M Wingert; Gene A Brewer
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2021-05-12

10.  Expecting Questions Modulates Cognitive Effort in a Syntactic Processing Task: Evidence From Pupillometry.

Authors:  Laura Roche Chapman; Brooke Hallowell
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2020-12-29       Impact factor: 2.297

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.