Literature DB >> 28503733

Long-term safety from transmission of porcine endogenous retrovirus after pig-to-non-human primate corneal transplantation.

Hyuk Jin Choi1,2,3, Jiyeon Kim3,4, Jae Young Kim1,2,3, Hyun Ju Lee2,3, Won Ryang Wee1,2,3, Mee Kum Kim1,2,3, Eung Soo Hwang3,4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The risk of xenozoonosis mainly by porcine endogenous retrovirus (PERV) has been considered as one of the main hurdles in xenotransplantation and therefore should be elucidated prior to the clinical use of porcine corneal grafts. Accordingly, an investigation was performed to analyze the infectivity of PERVs from porcine keratocytes to human cells, and the long-term risk of transmission of PERVs was determined using pig-to-non-human primate (NHP) corneal transplantation models.
METHODS: The infectivity of PERVs from the SNU miniature pig keratocytes was investigated by coculture with a human embryonic kidney cell line. Twenty-two rhesus macaques underwent xenocorneal transplantation as follows: (i) group 1 (n=4): anterior lamellar keratoplasty (LKP) with freshly preserved porcine corneas, (ii) group 2 (n=5): anterior LKP with decellularized porcine corneas followed by penetrating keratoplasty (PKP) with allografts, (iii) group 3 (n=3): PKP under steroid-based immunosuppression, (iv) group 4 (n=4): PKP under anti-CD154 antibody-based immunosuppression, (v) group 5 (n=4): deep anterior LKP with freshly preserved porcine corneas under anti-CD40 antibody-based immunosuppression, and (vi) group 6 (n=2): PKP under anti-CD40 antibody-based immunosuppression. Postoperative blood samples were serially collected, and tissue samples were obtained from thirteen different organs at the end of each experiment. The existence of PERV DNA and RNA was investigated using PCR and RT-PCR.
RESULTS: Using two independent in vitro infectivity tests, neither PERV pol nor pig mitochondrial cytochrome oxidase II was detected after 41 and 92 days of coculture, respectively. After xenocorneal transplantation, a total of 257 serial peripheral blood mononuclear cell samples, 34 serial plasma samples, and 282 tissue samples were obtained from the NHP recipients up to 1176 days post-transplantation. No PERV transmission was evident in any samples.
CONCLUSIONS: Within the limits of this study, there is no evidence to support any risk of PERV transmission from porcine corneal tissues to NHP recipients, despite the existence of PERV-expressing cells in porcine corneas.
© 2017 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  porcine endogenous retrovirus; xenocorneal transplantation; xenozoonosis

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28503733      PMCID: PMC5546926          DOI: 10.1111/xen.12314

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Xenotransplantation        ISSN: 0908-665X            Impact factor:   3.907


  44 in total

Review 1.  Xenotransplantation--the future of corneal transplantation?

Authors:  Hidetaka Hara; David K C Cooper
Journal:  Cornea       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 2.651

2.  No evidence of infection with porcine endogenous retrovirus in recipients of encapsulated porcine islet xenografts.

Authors:  R B Elliott; L Escobar; O Garkavenko; M C Croxson; B A Schroeder; M McGregor; G Ferguson; N Beckman; S Ferguson
Journal:  Cell Transplant       Date:  2000 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 4.064

3.  Efficacy of pig-to-rhesus lamellar corneal xenotransplantation.

Authors:  Hyuk Jin Choi; Mee Kum Kim; Hyun Ju Lee; Jung Hwa Ko; So Hee Jeong; Jae-Il Lee; Byoung-Chol Oh; Hee Jung Kang; Won Ryang Wee
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2011-08-22       Impact factor: 4.799

4.  Porcine endogenous retrovirus infects but does not replicate in nonhuman primate primary cells and cell lines.

Authors:  Armin Ritzhaupt; Luc J W Van Der Laan; Daniel R Salomon; Carolyn A Wilson
Journal:  J Virol       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 5.103

5.  Transmission of porcine endogenous retroviruses in severe combined immunodeficient mice xenotransplanted with fetal porcine pancreatic cells.

Authors:  Y M Deng; B E Tuch; W D Rawlinson
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  2000-10-15       Impact factor: 4.939

6.  No PERV transmission during a clinical trial of pig islet cell transplantation.

Authors:  Vladimir A Morozov; Shaun Wynyard; Shinichi Matsumoto; Adrian Abalovich; Joachim Denner; Robert Elliott
Journal:  Virus Res       Date:  2016-09-24       Impact factor: 3.303

7.  Identification of receptors for pig endogenous retrovirus.

Authors:  Thomas A Ericsson; Yasuhiro Takeuchi; Christian Templin; Gary Quinn; Shelli F Farhadian; James C Wood; Beth A Oldmixon; Kristen M Suling; Jennifer K Ishii; Yoshinori Kitagawa; Takayuki Miyazawa; Daniel R Salomon; Robin A Weiss; Clive Patience
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2003-05-09       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Differences in release and determination of subtype of porcine endogenous retroviruses produced by stimulated normal pig blood cells.

Authors:  Stefan J Tacke; Volker Specke; Joachim Denner
Journal:  Intervirology       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 1.763

9.  The International Xenotransplantation Association consensus statement on conditions for undertaking clinical trials of porcine islet products in type 1 diabetes--chapter 5: Strategies to prevent transmission of porcine endogenous retroviruses.

Authors:  Joachim Denner; Henk-Jan Schuurman; Clive Patience
Journal:  Xenotransplantation       Date:  2009 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.907

Review 10.  Porcine endogenous retrovirus and other viruses in xenotransplantation.

Authors:  Linda Scobie; Yasuhiro Takeuchi
Journal:  Curr Opin Organ Transplant       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 2.640

View more
  6 in total

1.  Long-term safety outcome of systemic immunosuppression in pig-to-nonhuman primate corneal xenotransplantation.

Authors:  Se Hyun Choi; Chang Ho Yoon; Hyun Ju Lee; Hong Pyo Kim; Jong Min Kim; Jeong-Hwan Che; Kyoung Min Roh; Hyuk Jin Choi; Jiyeon Kim; Eung Soo Hwang; Chung-Gyu Park; Mee Kum Kim
Journal:  Xenotransplantation       Date:  2018-07       Impact factor: 3.907

Review 2.  Xenotransplantation: past, present, and future.

Authors:  Burcin Ekser; Ping Li; David K C Cooper
Journal:  Curr Opin Organ Transplant       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 2.640

Review 3.  Decellularization methods for developing porcine corneal xenografts and future perspectives.

Authors:  Abdulkadir Isidan; Shaohui Liu; Ping Li; Matthew Lashmet; Lester J Smith; Hidetaka Hara; David K C Cooper; Burcin Ekser
Journal:  Xenotransplantation       Date:  2019-10-28       Impact factor: 3.907

4.  In-situ porcine corneal matrix hydrogel as ocular surface bandage.

Authors:  Ghasem Yazdanpanah; Ritu Shah; Sri Raghurama R Somala; Khandaker N Anwar; Xiang Shen; Seungwon An; Meisam Omidi; Mark I Rosenblatt; Tolou Shokuhfar; Ali R Djalilian
Journal:  Ocul Surf       Date:  2021-04-22       Impact factor: 6.268

Review 5.  Porcine Endogenous Retroviruses and Xenotransplantation, 2021.

Authors:  Joachim Denner
Journal:  Viruses       Date:  2021-10-26       Impact factor: 5.048

Review 6.  Virus Safety of Xenotransplantation.

Authors:  Joachim Denner
Journal:  Viruses       Date:  2022-08-30       Impact factor: 5.818

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.