Literature DB >> 28503439

Dry eye and corneal sensitivity after small incision lenticule extraction and femtosecond laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis: a Meta-analysis.

Wen-Ting Cai1, Qing-Yu Liu1, Cheng-Da Ren1, Qing-Quan Wei2, Jun-Ling Liu1, Qian-Yi Wang1, Ya-Ru Du3, Meng-Mei He1, Jing Yu1.   

Abstract

AIM: To assess the corneal sensitivity and the incidences of dry eye after small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) and femtosecond laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis (FS-LASIK).
METHODS: The Meta-analysis was performed using RevMan 5.3. We searched on PubMed from inception to March 2016. Summary weighted mean difference (WMD) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were used to analyze the datum. Random-effects or fixed-effects models were chosen up to between-study heterogeneity. The main outcomes were composed of the Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI) scores, tear film break-up time (TBUT), Schirmer Test and corneal sensitivity.
RESULTS: Eight eligible studies including 772 eyes (386 in SMILE group and 386 in FS-LASIK group) were identified. The parameters have no significiant difference heterogeneity between SMILE and FS-LASIK group preoperatively. There were significant differences between the two groups in OSDI scores at one and three months postoperatively, in TBUT at one and three months postoperatively, in corneal sensitivity at one week, about one month and three months postoperatively. However, there was no significant difference observed in Schirmer Test at the follow-up periods.
CONCLUSION: Compare to FS-LASIK, dry eye and the corneal sensitivity recover better in the SMILE group, in first three months after the surgery.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Meta-analysis; corneal sensation; dry eye; femtosecond laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis; small incision lenticule extraction

Year:  2017        PMID: 28503439      PMCID: PMC5406644          DOI: 10.18240/ijo.2017.04.21

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol        ISSN: 2222-3959            Impact factor:   1.779


  28 in total

1.  Comparison of Corneal Biological Healing After Femtosecond LASIK and Small Incision Lenticule Extraction Procedure.

Authors:  Lei Xia; Jing Zhang; Junshu Wu; Keming Yu
Journal:  Curr Eye Res       Date:  2016-02-01       Impact factor: 2.424

Review 2.  Photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) versus laser-assisted in-situ keratomileusis (LASIK) for myopia.

Authors:  A J Shortt; B D S Allan
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2006-04-19

Review 3.  Advances in Refractive Surgery: May 2013 to June 2014.

Authors:  Naveen Mysore; Ronald Krueger
Journal:  Asia Pac J Ophthalmol (Phila)       Date:  2015 Mar-Apr

Review 4.  Femtosecond laser refractive surgery: small-incision lenticule extraction vs. femtosecond laser-assisted LASIK.

Authors:  Jimmy K Lee; Roy S Chuck; Choul Yong Park
Journal:  Curr Opin Ophthalmol       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 3.761

5.  Comparison of corneal hysteresis and corneal resistance factor after small incision lenticule extraction and femtosecond laser-assisted LASIK: a prospective fellow eye study.

Authors:  Alper Agca; Engin Bilge Ozgurhan; Ahmet Demirok; Ercument Bozkurt; Ugur Celik; Abdullah Ozkaya; Ilker Cankaya; Omer Faruk Yilmaz
Journal:  Cont Lens Anterior Eye       Date:  2013-07-04       Impact factor: 3.077

6.  Fellow Eye Comparison of Nerve Fiber Regeneration After SMILE and Femtosecond Laser-assisted LASIK: A Confocal Microscopy Study.

Authors:  Alper Agca; Kadir I Cankaya; Ihsan Yilmaz; Yusuf Yildirim; Dilek Yasa; Onur Olcucu; Ali Demircan; Ahmet Demirok; Omer F Yilmaz
Journal:  J Refract Surg       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 3.573

7.  Corneal sensation after corneal refractive surgery with small incision lenticule extraction.

Authors:  Ahmet Demirok; Engin Bilge Ozgurhan; Alper Agca; Necip Kara; Ercument Bozkurt; Kadir Ilker Cankaya; Omer Faruk Yilmaz
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 1.973

8.  Comparison of visual and refractive outcomes following femtosecond laser- assisted lasik with smile in patients with myopia or myopic astigmatism.

Authors:  Sri Ganesh; Rishika Gupta
Journal:  J Refract Surg       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 3.573

Review 9.  Small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) history, fundamentals of a new refractive surgery technique and clinical outcomes.

Authors:  Dan Z Reinstein; Timothy J Archer; Marine Gobbe
Journal:  Eye Vis (Lond)       Date:  2014-10-16

10.  Dry Eye Disease following Refractive Surgery: A 12-Month Follow-Up of SMILE versus FS-LASIK in High Myopia.

Authors:  Bingjie Wang; Rajeev K Naidu; Renyuan Chu; Jinhui Dai; Xiaomei Qu; Hao Zhou
Journal:  J Ophthalmol       Date:  2015-11-15       Impact factor: 1.909

View more
  10 in total

1.  Small Incision Lenticule Extraction SMILE - The Future of Refractive Surgery is Here.

Authors:  John F Doane; Jae E Cauble; Jace J Rickstrew; J Quinten Tuckfield
Journal:  Mo Med       Date:  2018 Jan-Feb

Review 2.  Refractive lenticule extraction small incision lenticule extraction: A new refractive surgery paradigm.

Authors:  Sri Ganesh; Sheetal Brar; Raghavender Reddy Arra
Journal:  Indian J Ophthalmol       Date:  2018-01       Impact factor: 1.848

3.  Uncorrected visual acuity, postoperative astigmatism, and dry eye symptoms are major determinants of patient satisfaction: a comparative, real-life study of femtosecond laser in situ keratomileusis and small incision lenticule extraction for myopia.

Authors:  Juhani Pietilä; Anne Huhtala; Petri Mäkinen; Janika Nättinen; Teppo Rajala; Kalle Salmenhaara; Hannu Uusitalo
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2018-09-10

Review 4.  Small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) techniques: patient selection and perspectives.

Authors:  Jeewan S Titiyal; Manpreet Kaur; Farin Shaikh; Meghal Gagrani; Anand Singh Brar; Anubha Rathi
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2018-09-05

Review 5.  Complications of small incision lenticule extraction.

Authors:  Mohamed Ibrahime Asif; Rahul Kumar Bafna; Jodhbir Singh Mehta; Jagadesh Reddy; Jeewan Singh Titiyal; Prafulla K Maharana; Namrata Sharma
Journal:  Indian J Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-12       Impact factor: 1.848

Review 6.  Algorithmic approach to diagnosis and management of post-refractive surgery dry eye disease.

Authors:  Sharon D'Souza; Edwin James; Rishi Swarup; Sheetal Mahuvakar; Aditya Pradhan; Krati Gupta
Journal:  Indian J Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-12       Impact factor: 1.848

7.  Effect of Cap-Lenticule Diameter Difference on the Visual Outcome and Higher-Order Aberrations in SMILE: 0.4 mm versus 1.0 mm.

Authors:  Banu Torun Acar; Suphi Acar
Journal:  J Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-11-15       Impact factor: 1.909

Review 8.  Dry Eyes After SMILE.

Authors:  Angela H Y Wong; Rachel K Y Cheung; Wee Nie Kua; Kendrick C Shih; Tommy C Y Chan; Kelvin H Wan
Journal:  Asia Pac J Ophthalmol (Phila)       Date:  2019 Sep-Oct

Review 9.  Astigmatism Correction Using SMILE.

Authors:  Sharon S W Chow; Loraine L W Chow; Chester Z Lee; Tommy C Y Chan
Journal:  Asia Pac J Ophthalmol (Phila)       Date:  2019 Sep-Oct

10.  One year outcomes after small incision lenticule extraction ReLEX in the correction of myopia and myopic astigmatism.

Authors:  Cristina Ariadna Nicula; Dorin Nicula; Sorana D Bolboacă; Adriana Elena Bulboacă
Journal:  BMC Ophthalmol       Date:  2021-12-08       Impact factor: 2.209

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.