We present a study of the relation between the surface chemistry and nanocrystal shape of PbSe nanocrystals with a variable Pb-to-Se stoichiometry and density of oleate ligands. The oleate ligand density and binding configuration are monitored by nuclear magnetic resonance and Fourier transform infrared absorbance spectroscopy, allowing us to quantify the number of surface-attached ligands per NC and the nature of the surface-Pb-oleate configuration. The three-dimensional shape of the PbSe nanocrystals is obtained from high-angle annular dark field scanning transmission electron microscopy combined with an atom counting method. We show that the enhanced oleate capping results in a stabilization and extension of the {111} facets, and a crystal shape transformation from a truncated nanocube to a truncated octahedron.
We present a study of the relation between the surface chemistry and nanocrystal shape of PbSe nanocrystals with a variable Pb-to-Se stoichiometry and density of oleate ligands. The oleate ligand density and binding configuration are monitored by nuclear magnetic resonance and Fourier transform infrared absorbance spectroscopy, allowing us to quantify the number of surface-attached ligands per NC and the nature of the surface-Pb-oleate configuration. The three-dimensional shape of the PbSe nanocrystals is obtained from high-angle annular dark field scanning transmission electron microscopy combined with an atom counting method. We show that the enhanced oleate capping results in a stabilization and extension of the {111} facets, and a crystal shape transformation from a truncated nanocube to a truncated octahedron.
Nanometer-sized crystals
(NCs) of the lead chalcogenide family
continue to intrigue researchers for several reasons. First, they
show bright exciton luminescence in the near infrared (IR) that can
be tuned over a broad energy range by the crystal dimensions.[1] Second, lead chalcogenide nanocrystals (NCs)
can be self-assembled into thin-film quantum dot solids, in which
the quantum coupling between the NCs can be tuned. Thin-film systems
based on NCs separated by short ligand molecules are of interest for
IR photodetectors[2] and solar cells.[3−5] Recently, it has been reported that interfacial ordering and epitaxial
attachment resulted in NC monolayers with a square or honeycomb nanogeometry.[6,7]The energy level structure, photoluminescence, and propensity
to
form atomically coherent two-dimensional (2D) superstructures depend
critically on the size and shape of the lead chalcogenide NCs and
on their surface chemistry, as well.[8−12] It has been established that PbSe NCs that are well-capped
with oleate have an excess of Pb atoms.[13−15] In addition, it is theoretically
shown that the binding strength and configuration of oleate ligands
depend on the type of facet.[16,17]Lead chalcogenide
NCs, with PbSe being of interest here, have a
rock salt crystal structure. When we consider the uncoordinated crystal,
the {100} facets, containing square ordered Pb and Se, have the lowest
surface energy.[17−19] It is thus expected that PbSe NCs have a cubic shape,
terminated by six {100} facets. The Wulff reconstruction is presented
in section S1 of the Supporting Information. However, in the case of PbSe capped
with oleate ligands, different nanocrystal shapes have been reported
ranging from a truncated nanocube (or rhombal cuboctahedron) to a
truncated octahedron.[6,8,20] Hence,
besides the {100} facets, {111} and {110} facets are also observed.
Moreover, it is not yet clear why different PbSe NC shapes are observed,and
how this is related to the surface chemistry.Here, we present
a study of the relation between the surface chemistry
and nanocrystal shape of PbSe NCs (5.6 nm) capped with oleate ligands.
Pb–oleate binding is monitored by Fourier transform infrared
(FTIR) absorbance and nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy,
allowing us to quantify the nature of the surface–Pb–oleate
configuration and the number of surface-attached ligands per NC. The
shape of the NCs in three dimensions is obtained via high-angle annular
dark field scanning transmission electron microscopy (HAADF-STEM)
combined with an atom counting method that has been established previously.[21,22] We have studied the relation between the shape and surface chemistry
under well-defined chemical conditions. After conventional PbSe synthesis,
we have washed the NCs eight times to remove all remaining precursor
moieties and reduce the oleate capping to a minimum. Then we gradually
added Pb(oleate)2 to the suspension and monitored the attached
oleate capping (by NMR) and the NC shape, as well. Our results show
that enhanced oleate capping results in a stabilization and extension
of the {111} facets and a remarkable transformation of the nanocrystal
shape.
Results
Figure A shows
an overview of the infrared spectrum of a PbSe nanocrystal suspension
in tetrachloroethylene (TCE) that has been washed eight times with
methanol. Washing removes unreacted precursor molecules, excess ligand
molecules, and possibly ligand molecules that are only weakly bound
to the NCs (see section S2 of the Supporting Information).[23,24] In Figure A, three
regions can be distinguished. The peaks in region a are due to the
carboxylic stretching vibrations and will be detailed below. The peaks
in region b are due to the CH2 and CH3 stretching
vibrations of the oleate. The IR absorbance in region c, starting
with the peak at 0.64 eV and extending to higher energies, reflects
the optical transitions in the PbSe NCs. Because of a calibration
procedure developed by Moreels et al.,[13] we can use this peak to determine the concentration of PbSe NCs
in the solution.
Figure 1
Infrared spectrum of well-washed oleate-capped PbSe NCs
in tetrachloroethylene.
(A) FTIR spectrum of well-washed PbSe NCs (5.6 nm) dissolved in tetrachloroethylene
showing three regions of interest: (a) region of C–O vibrations,
detailed in Figure , (b) a peak due to the CH2 asymmetric stretching vibrations
of oleate molecules (attached to the NCs or dissolved), and (c) the
IR absorption peak due to the band-edge exciton in the PbSe NCs. From
the integration of region c, the concentration of NCs in the solution
can be determined. From the integration of peak b, the total concentration
of oleate in the suspension (the sum of oleate attached to the NCs
and dissolved oleate) can be determined. This is performed by using
a calibration curve (panel B), i.e., the integrated absorbance under
peak b vs the concentration of Pb(oleate)2 in a solution
containing only Pb(oleate)2 (R2 = 0.999).
Infrared spectrum of well-washed oleate-capped PbSe NCs
in tetrachloroethylene.
(A) FTIR spectrum of well-washed PbSe NCs (5.6 nm) dissolved in tetrachloroethylene
showing three regions of interest: (a) region of C–O vibrations,
detailed in Figure , (b) a peak due to the CH2 asymmetric stretching vibrations
of oleate molecules (attached to the NCs or dissolved), and (c) the
IR absorption peak due to the band-edge exciton in the PbSe NCs. From
the integration of region c, the concentration of NCs in the solution
can be determined. From the integration of peak b, the total concentration
of oleate in the suspension (the sum of oleate attached to the NCs
and dissolved oleate) can be determined. This is performed by using
a calibration curve (panel B), i.e., the integrated absorbance under
peak b vs the concentration of Pb(oleate)2 in a solution
containing only Pb(oleate)2 (R2 = 0.999).
Figure 2
Detailed spectra of the carboxylic region. In panel A,
the carboxylic
regions of washed NCs (red), Pb(oleate)2 (green), and oleic
acid (blue) are shown. The carboxylic vibrations are sketched in panel
B. Symmetric and asymmetric carboxylic vibrations ν1 and ν2 in PbSe NCs and Pb(oleate)2 are
each composed of two peaks. The decomposition and notation are presented
in panel C; the meaning is discussed in the text. Panel D shows the
carboxylic region for well-washed NCs (red) and titrated NCs (blue).
Panel E presents sketches of the bridging configuration and the (a)symmetric
chelating bidentate configurations.
Using the integrated
value under peak b, we can determine the total
amount of oleate present in the suspension. We therefore calibrated
peak b (see Figure B). Subsequently, we used the integrated peak value (Figure A) to determine the total number
of oleate moieties present in the suspension (attached to the NCs
and freely dissolved). Combining the integrated values of peaks b
and c, we can obtain the total number of oleate moieties per PbSe
nanocrystal present in the suspension.We remark here that peaks
due to H2O and OH are completely
absent in the spectra (see Figure S3),
excluding the presence of water, hydroxide, and oleic acid as ligands
on our PbSe NCs. A comparison of the FTIR spectra of diphenylphosphine
(DPP), trioctylphosphine (TOP), and Pb(oleate)2 with the
PbSe NC suspension excludes DPP and indicates that TOP can be present
in only small quantities, if it is present at all (see Figure S4). These findings contrast with those
reported in the literature, where for PbS NCs, the presence of oleic
acid and hydroxide on different facets of the surface of NCs has been
reported.[17,25] We remark here that the hydroxide peak found
by Grisorio et al.[25] cannot be attributed
to oxidation of the dots (see Figure S5). As Grisorio et al. claimed, it can be the result from the use
of Pb(oleate)2-hydrate in their advanced synthesis procedure
for PbS nanocrystals.[26] We also remark
that we did not observe hydroxide and oleic acid signals for the NCs
synthesized with the method developed by Campos et al.[27]Now, we focus on the carboxyl stretch
vibrations in the energy
region between 1350 and 1750 cm–1. A detailed spectrum
of the well-washed PbSe NCs (Figure A–C) shows two broad
peaks, reflecting the symmetric (ν1) and asymmetric
carboxyl stretch (ν2) of the oleate moiety (Figure B). Figure A also displays the reference
spectra of dissolved Pb(oleate)2 (green) and oleic acid
(blue), indicating that the Pb(oleate)2 solution contains
oleic acid as an impurity. A spectrum that shows only the features
of a pure Pb(oleate)2 solution can be obtained by subtraction
(see Figure S6). From comparison of the
spectra in Figure a, it becomes clear that the spectrum of the well-washed PbSe NCs
lacks the peak at 0.212 eV, specific for oleic acid, and has a much
more pronounced ν1 peak due to the symmetric carboxylic
stretch vibration.Detailed spectra of the carboxylic region. In panel A,
the carboxylic
regions of washed NCs (red), Pb(oleate)2 (green), and oleic
acid (blue) are shown. The carboxylic vibrations are sketched in panel
B. Symmetric and asymmetric carboxylic vibrations ν1 and ν2 in PbSe NCs and Pb(oleate)2 are
each composed of two peaks. The decomposition and notation are presented
in panel C; the meaning is discussed in the text. Panel D shows the
carboxylic region for well-washed NCs (red) and titrated NCs (blue).
Panel E presents sketches of the bridging configuration and the (a)symmetric
chelating bidentate configurations.Peaks ν1 and ν2 each consist
of a doublet (see Figure C). For peak ν1, we note the (left) low-energy
peak as ν1,b and the one at a higher energy as ν1,s. Notice that for ν2, the lower-energy
peak is denoted as ν2,s and the high-energy peak
as ν2,b. The peak splitting suggests that we have
two types of Pb–oleate binding configurations. Cass et al.
showed that the inner couple (ν1,s and ν2,s) can be attributed to an asymmetric chelating bidentate
configuration (see Figure E) if the splitting is between 100 and 125 cm–1.[28] We find a separation between the inner
peaks of 103 cm–1, indicating that the asymmetric
Pb–oleate chelating bidentate configuration is one of the dominating
configurations.[28,29] The outer peaks (ν1,b and ν2,b) point to a bridging configuration
of the oleate bound to two neighboring Pb atoms. The splitting that
we observe, 141 cm–1, is in line with such a bridging
configuration.[30,31] The intensity of the symmetric
vibration is much larger for NCs than for dissolved Pb(oleate)2. The relative intensity of a vibrational peak increases with
the increasing dipole moment of the vibrating moiety. This would mean
that the Pb–oleate bidentate complex attached to a facet has
a dipole moment that is stronger than that of the Pb–oleate
complexes that form in solution.Via comparison of the full
width at half-maximum (fwhm) of each
of the composed peaks, ν1 and ν2, to the corresponding peaks of free Pb(oleate)2, it is
clear that there is a strong broadening of the surface-attached Pb–oleate
complex (Table ).
The fwhm of the composed symmetric stretch ν1 increases
from 30 to 36 cm–1, while the asymmetric stretch
ν2 increases from 56 to 68 cm–1. It is tempting to relate this to the roughness of the facets for
which we present evidence below.
Table 1
Distances and Full
Widths at Half-Maximum
of the Carboxylic Peaks
Δ(ν1b–ν2b) (cm–1)
Δ(ν1s–ν2s) (cm–1)
fwhm ν1 (cm–1)
fwhm ν2 (cm–1)
Pb(oleate)2
150
112
30
56
well-washed
141
103
36
68
titrated NCs
120
108
35
62
Now, we discuss the equilibrium
between freely dissolved Pb(oleate)2 and Pb–oleate
units at the surface of the PbSe NCs.
With the analysis described above (peak b in Figure referred to the NC concentration obtained
from peak c in Figure ) and from NMR results detailed below, we found for the well-washed
NC suspension (red curve) an average of 258–276 oleates/NC,
corresponding to a ligand density of 2.2–2.3 oleates/nm2 (assuming a spherical shape). To test if this is really the
minimum, a small amount of halide salt dissolved in methanol is added
to the suspension. The ligand density can in this way be reduced to
2.0 oleates/nm2, because of ligand exchange. We did not
observe lower densities for colloidally stable PbSe NCs. Next, we
performed a titration experiment starting from a suspension of PbSe
NCs, washed eight times, to which we gradually added Pb(oleate)2. In this titration experiment, we added Pb(oleate)2 to the well-washed suspension and followed the evolution of the 1H NMR signal of the two hydrogen atoms bound to the C=C
atoms of oleic acid (Figure A). It can be seen that because of the large difference in
diffusion coefficients, freely dissolved Pb(oleate)2 (black
curve) can be distinguished from the oleate attached to the NCs[24,32] (red curve). Via addition of Pb(oleate)2 (colored curves),
the spectra combine the contributions of attached and free oleate.
They can be quantified by fitting the curves on the basis of the red
(only attached oleate) and black (only free oleate) spectra (see Figure S7). Via a reference molecule in a known
amount (an internal standard) and the known concentration of NCs,
it is also possible to calculate the number of ligands per NC and
the ligand density (Figure S8), as demonstrated
previously.[24,32] The results of the titration
experiment are presented in Figure B, showing that the number of attached oleate moieties
first increases to saturate at a maximum of approximately 368 oleates/NC.
This must be the maximal oleate ligand coverage possible per nanocrystal,
which corresponds to a ligand density of 3.2 oleates/nm2, in agreement with previous results for as-synthesized NCs.[10,32]
Figure 3
Titration
of a well-washed PbSe NC suspension with Pb(oleate)2. A)
Close-up of the 1H NMR spectra for the two
hydrogen atoms bound to the C=C atoms in the oleate. The black
spectrum of freely dissolved Pb(oleate)2 and the red spectrum
of well-washed PbSe NCs are normalized on their methyl integral, so
spectra at similar oleate concentrations can be compared. The spectrum
of well-washed NCs (red) shows a broad feature, indicating all oleate
is bound to the surface. The orange, yellow, etc., spectra were obtained
during gradual addition of Pb(oleate)2 to the well-washed
NC suspension. It can be seen that first the magnitude of the broad
peak increases (maximum at 5.3 ppm) while with an increase in the
amount of Pb(oleate)2 added the sharp peak at 5.35 ppm
also arises. Deconvolution of both peaks (shown in Figure S7) allowed us to quantify the number of attached and
freely dissolved Pb(oleate)2 per NC during the titration
experiment. This is shown in panel B, including the red dot determined
via FTIR. The derived ligand densities are colored orange (2.4 oleates/nm2), yellow (2.5 oleates/nm2), green (3.2 oleates/nm2), blue (3.1 oleates/nm2), and purple (3.2 oleates/nm2).
Titration
of a well-washed PbSe NC suspension with Pb(oleate)2. A)
Close-up of the 1H NMR spectra for the two
hydrogen atoms bound to the C=C atoms in the oleate. The black
spectrum of freely dissolved Pb(oleate)2 and the red spectrum
of well-washed PbSe NCs are normalized on their methyl integral, so
spectra at similar oleate concentrations can be compared. The spectrum
of well-washed NCs (red) shows a broad feature, indicating all oleate
is bound to the surface. The orange, yellow, etc., spectra were obtained
during gradual addition of Pb(oleate)2 to the well-washed
NC suspension. It can be seen that first the magnitude of the broad
peak increases (maximum at 5.3 ppm) while with an increase in the
amount of Pb(oleate)2 added the sharp peak at 5.35 ppm
also arises. Deconvolution of both peaks (shown in Figure S7) allowed us to quantify the number of attached and
freely dissolved Pb(oleate)2 per NC during the titration
experiment. This is shown in panel B, including the red dot determined
via FTIR. The derived ligand densities are colored orange (2.4 oleates/nm2), yellow (2.5 oleates/nm2), green (3.2 oleates/nm2), blue (3.1 oleates/nm2), and purple (3.2 oleates/nm2).We emphasize that our quantification
of the chemisorption process
in Pb(oleate)2 units does not mean that the chemisorbed
entities remain preserved as Pb(oleate)2. In Figure and Table , it can be seen that for the titrated NCs
the intensity of the outer peaks decreases, indicating relatively
less oleate bound in bridging configurations. Moreover, the peak widths
are slightly reduced after the titration, indicating that the titration
results in facets with less atomic disorder. It will be shown below
that Pb(oleate)2 chemisorption is followed by reconfiguration
of the Pb–ligand binding and a transformation of the nanocrystal
shape.
Table 2
Percentages of Surface Atoms That
Have a Specific Coordination Number That Corresponds to Surface Facets
low ligand
density
high ligand
density
{100} coordination
12.1% (10.7–13.4%)
13.6% (12.2–15.0%)
{110} coordination
18.3% (16.7–20.0%)
14.9% (13.4–16.3%)
{111} coordination
17.3% (15.7–18.9%)
21.8% (20.1–23.4%)
irregular coordination
52.3% (50.2–54.4%)
49.8% (47.7–51.8%)
We have investigated
the three-dimensional (3D) atomic structure
of PbSe NCs with the minimal and maximal values of oleate capping.
Because the NCs in this study are sensitive to the electron beam,
high-resolution electron tomography could not be applied to determine
their three-dimensional (3D) shape.[33−35] Therefore, the 3D atomic
structure is extracted from 2D HAADF-STEM projection images, a statistical
atom counting procedure and an energy relaxation procedure, developed
in previous work (see Figures S9 and S10).[21,36,37]HAADF-STEM
images showing an overview of the particles with minimal
and maximal oleate coverage are displayed in panels A and F of Figure , respectively. The
NCs with a high ligand density assemble into a hexagonal array. HAADF-STEM
images acquired using a higher magnification for both samples are
presented in panels B and G of Figure . Both images show a nanocrystal oriented along a [110]
zone axis. These images have been used as input for a statistical
atom counting procedure yielding the number of atoms in each projected
atomic column (Figure C,H). Here, counting results are obtained with 90% single-atom sensitivity,
meaning that for 90% of all atom columns the number of atoms is correctly
assigned, whereas the probability to miscount by ±1 atom is 10%.
Figure 4
HAADF-STEM
study of PbSe NCs with an atom counting technique. The
top row (A–E) shows the shape analysis for low-ligand density
NCs and the bottom row (F–J) the maximal ligand densities.
Panels A and F are HAADF-STEM images of a group of PbSe NCs, whereas
panels B and G are magnified images for PbSe NCs that are oriented
in such a way that the lead atoms are oriented in columns. In panels
C and H, the intensities of the columns are integrated and the numbers
of lead atoms in that row are counted and color-coded. Subsequently,
10 NCs of each sample are averaged (see Figure S10 for the procedure) in panels D and I. We propose models
E and J for the fitted data shown in panels D and I, respectively.
Notice the increased size of the {111} facets for the oleate-saturated
NCs.
HAADF-STEM
study of PbSe NCs with an atom counting technique. The
top row (A–E) shows the shape analysis for low-ligand density
NCs and the bottom row (F–J) the maximal ligand densities.
Panels A and F are HAADF-STEM images of a group of PbSe NCs, whereas
panels B and G are magnified images for PbSe NCs that are oriented
in such a way that the lead atoms are oriented in columns. In panels
C and H, the intensities of the columns are integrated and the numbers
of lead atoms in that row are counted and color-coded. Subsequently,
10 NCs of each sample are averaged (see Figure S10 for the procedure) in panels D and I. We propose models
E and J for the fitted data shown in panels D and I, respectively.
Notice the increased size of the {111} facets for the oleate-saturated
NCs.Starting from these numbers, we
can obtain a 3D model for each
individual nanocrystal using a Monte Carlo-based energy minimization
scheme.[37,38] We have performed such a procedure for 10
different NCs of both ligand densities, as presented in Figure S9. It can be observed that for the particles
with a low ligand density, the crystal facets are rather small and
contain several loose atoms. In line with atomic simulations of ligand-free
NCs, we attribute this surface roughness to atomic surface reconstructions.[18] The possibility that the electron beam induces
some atom sublimation, however, cannot be excluded, although the exposure
time is kept as short as possible. The 3D shape determination shows
that particles with a high ligand density have {111} facets that are
larger than those of low-ligand density particles. To obtain a prototypical
shape of the PbSe NCs, an averaging method was applied that uses the
3D models of the individual NCs as a basis (see Figure S10 for a more detailed explanation of the averaging
procedure). The result of this procedure is presented in panels D
and I of Figure ;
it can be observed that the shape of the well-washed PbSe NCs (low
level of oleate capping) is a nanocube in which truncation results
in the presence of {110} and {111} facets, besides the {100} facets.
In addition, there is a considerable degree of atomic disorder present
on each of these facets that we attribute to atomic surface reconstructions
of the bare crystal facets.For the NCs with maximal oleate
capping, a remarkable transformation
of the shape is observed. The {111} facets become more dominant at
the expense of the {110} facets, although the latter do not disappear
completely. Thus, the added Pb(oleate)2 ligands stabilize
and order the {111} facets. The truncated octahedral shape is similar
to that found for PbS crystals[17] and for
as-synthesized PbSe NCs.[16,20] Idealized models are
presented in panels E and J of Figure . To quantify the increase in the number of {111} facets
for the sample with a high ligand density, the coordination number
of surface Pb atoms with other Pb atoms can be used. This number can
be related to the surface types that are present in the final configurations.
The results are presented in Table together with the 68% confidence intervals, indicating
that 22% of the surface atoms belong to a {111} facet (coordination
number of 9) for the sample with a high ligand density. For the PbSe
NCs with a low ligand density, only 17% of the surface atoms belonged
to a {111} facet. The number of irregular atoms, not having a {100},
{110}, or {111} coordination number, decreases from 53 to 49% with
an increase in ligand density. Edge atoms are also included in the
irregular category, because these have a lower coordination number.
Thus, the real facets are on average two Pb atoms larger in the two
orthogonal directions (see Figure ) than following from Table .
Discussion
We start with the well-washed
PbSe NCs that have a truncated cubic
shape with rather rough facets and a minimum of capping ligands. For
such a nanocrystal type, the surface energies of the three facets
have been calculated by Schapotschnikov et al.[18] for the case in which no capping is present: the {100}
facets have an energy much lower than that of the {110} and {111}
facets. In fact, naked {111} facets have such a high energy that they
tend to be reconstructed in simulations: on Pb-terminated {111} surfaces,
for example, Pb atoms are partially pulled inward while Se atoms pop
up, resulting in a reconstructed rough surface. The well-washed samples
have a relatively small number of oleate ligands [258–276 per
nanocrystal (see above)]; it is reasonable to assume that they are
preferentially bound to Pb atoms of the {111} surfaces to minimize
the energy of the entire nanocrystal. The amount of surface lead atoms
on the {111} crystalline facet can be roughly estimated from the averaged
model (Figure E).
This results in 220 Pb atoms; this number is too small to accommodate
all oleate ligands (258 or 276 on average), and thus, ∼20%
of the oleates is bound the {110} or {100} surfaces. The ideal position
of a Pb–oleate moiety would be in the fcc valley of three Se
atoms at the {111} facet; the Pb–oleate moieties attached to
the {110} or {100} facets together with surface roughness would explain
the broadening of the ν1 and ν2 peaks
in the carboxylic region (see Figure ).What happens to the well-washed PbSe NCs when
Pb(oleate)2 is added to the PbSe NC suspension? Initially,
the added Pb(oleate)2 can bind to any Se surface atom,
as an MX2 or
Z-type ligand.[39] It has been reported that
the (surface) atoms of PbSe nanocrystals have a high mobility, even
at room temperature.[23,24,40] This should allow the chemisorbed Pb(oleate)2 to reconfigure
such that the energy of the PbSe nanocrystals is minimized. We observed
that the {111} facets become more extended at the expense of the {110}
facets. This can occur via the following steps. (i) The chemisorbed
Pb(oleate)2 is split into a Pb(oleate) moiety that becomes
optimally coordinated in the valley of three Se surface atoms. (ii)
The remaining oleate binds to a free Pb atom at a valley position.
This process is presented in a schematic way in Figure . The process of Pb(oleate)2 chemisorption,
splitting, and stabilization and extension of Pb–oleate-terminated
{111} surfaces is schematically presented in Scheme .
Figure 5
Scheme describing the attachment and integration of a Pb(oleate)2. Attachment of these Z-type ligands on a PbSe NC resulting
in stabilization of a Pb–oleate-terminated {111} facet. Panel
A shows an unsaturated facet, typical for well-washed PbSe NCs. Panels
B and C show the chemisorbtion of Pb(oleate)2 as a Z-type
ligand. Panel D shows the stabilization of the Pb–oleate-terminated
{111} facets.
Scheme 1
Chemisorption of Pb(oleate)2 and
the Ensuing Reconfiguration
Scheme describing the attachment and integration of a Pb(oleate)2. Attachment of these Z-type ligands on a PbSe NC resulting
in stabilization of a Pb–oleate-terminated {111} facet. Panel
A shows an unsaturated facet, typical for well-washed PbSe NCs. Panels
B and C show the chemisorbtion of Pb(oleate)2 as a Z-type
ligand. Panel D shows the stabilization of the Pb–oleate-terminated
{111} facets.This formal notation
accounts for charge neutrality and mass balance.
The reconfiguration results in a stabilization and extension of the
{111} facets, in agreement with the observation. For the well-washed
PbSe samples, y is approximately 184, including the
edges of the {111} facets. After chemisorption of the added Pb(oleate)2 and the reconfiguration process, the maximal excess of Pb
per nanocrystal amounts to y/2 + n. The maximal oleate coverage y + 2n is equal to 368 oleates/NC. This can be compared with the number
of available {111} lead surface positions on the averaged PbSe NCs
presented in Figure I, being 356. This means that PbSe nanocrystals with a maximal oleate
coverage have almost all oleate ligands attached to the {111} facets
and its edges.By the addition of Pb(oleate)2 to
a suspension of well-washed
NCs, the NCs acquire a larger excess of lead atoms, the charge neutrality
is preserved, and the ligand stabilization of the {111} surfaces is
optimized (see Scheme and Figure ). This
is in line with the reduced IR line widths, indicating reduced levels
of atomic disorder on the facets and more (a)symmetric carboxylic
configurations (see Table and Figure D). Moreover, the stabilization and extension of the {111} facets
result in a shape transformation of the nanocrystal from a truncated
cube to a cuboctahedron (truncated octahedron) solely with {111} and
{100} facets. We believe that the final situation that we reach by
addition of Pb(oleate)2 to well-washed samples is close
to that of “as-synthesized” PbSe nanocrystals.In summary, we have used IR absorption spectroscopy and NMR to
quantitatively measure the number of Pb(oleate) ligands per PbSe nanocrystal.
We have shown that PbSe NCs can be colloidally stable with a wide
range of oleate ligand densities. Our washing and titration cycle
suggests that the process of removing and adding oleate ligands is
reversible. Pb(oleate)2 chemisorption and surface reconfiguration
result in a transformation of the nanocrystal shape from a truncated
nanocube with rough surface facets to a truncated octahedron with
larger and smooth {111} facets.
Authors: M P Boneschanscher; W H Evers; J J Geuchies; T Altantzis; B Goris; F T Rabouw; S A P van Rossum; H S J van der Zant; L D A Siebbeles; G Van Tendeloo; I Swart; J Hilhorst; A V Petukhov; S Bals; D Vanmaekelbergh Journal: Science Date: 2014-05-29 Impact factor: 47.728
Authors: Roberto Grisorio; Doriana Debellis; Gian Paolo Suranna; Giuseppe Gigli; Carlo Giansante Journal: Angew Chem Int Ed Engl Date: 2016-04-01 Impact factor: 15.336
Authors: Jaco J Geuchies; Carlo van Overbeek; Wiel H Evers; Bart Goris; Annick de Backer; Anjan P Gantapara; Freddy T Rabouw; Jan Hilhorst; Joep L Peters; Oleg Konovalov; Andrei V Petukhov; Marjolein Dijkstra; Laurens D A Siebbeles; Sandra van Aert; Sara Bals; Daniel Vanmaekelbergh Journal: Nat Mater Date: 2016-09-05 Impact factor: 43.841
Authors: Angshuman Nag; Maksym V Kovalenko; Jong-Soo Lee; Wenyong Liu; Boris Spokoyny; Dmitri V Talapin Journal: J Am Chem Soc Date: 2011-06-17 Impact factor: 15.419
Authors: S Bals; S Van Aert; C P Romero; K Lauwaet; M J Van Bael; B Schoeters; B Partoens; E Yücelen; P Lievens; G Van Tendeloo Journal: Nat Commun Date: 2012-06-12 Impact factor: 14.919
Authors: Wiel H Evers; Juleon M Schins; Michiel Aerts; Aditya Kulkarni; Pierre Capiod; Maxime Berthe; Bruno Grandidier; Christophe Delerue; Herre S J van der Zant; Carlo van Overbeek; Joep L Peters; Daniel Vanmaekelbergh; Laurens D A Siebbeles Journal: Nat Commun Date: 2015-09-24 Impact factor: 14.919
Authors: Giulio Guzzinati; Thomas Altantzis; Maria Batuk; Annick De Backer; Gunnar Lumbeeck; Vahid Samaee; Dmitry Batuk; Hosni Idrissi; Joke Hadermann; Sandra Van Aert; Dominique Schryvers; Johan Verbeeck; Sara Bals Journal: Materials (Basel) Date: 2018-07-28 Impact factor: 3.623
Authors: Joep L Peters; Thomas Altantzis; Ivan Lobato; Maryam Alimoradi Jazi; Carlo van Overbeek; Sara Bals; Daniel Vanmaekelbergh; Sophia Buhbut Sinai Journal: Chem Mater Date: 2018-07-03 Impact factor: 9.811
Authors: Thomas Altantzis; Ivan Lobato; Annick De Backer; Armand Béché; Yang Zhang; Shibabrata Basak; Mauro Porcu; Qiang Xu; Ana Sánchez-Iglesias; Luis M Liz-Marzán; Gustaaf Van Tendeloo; Sandra Van Aert; Sara Bals Journal: Nano Lett Date: 2018-12-14 Impact factor: 11.189
Authors: Maaike M van der Sluijs; Dinja Sanders; Kevin J Jansen; Giuseppe Soligno; Daniel Vanmaekelbergh; Joep L Peters Journal: J Phys Chem C Nanomater Interfaces Date: 2022-01-05 Impact factor: 4.126
Authors: Carlo van Overbeek; Joep L Peters; Susan A P van Rossum; Marc Smits; Marijn A van Huis; Daniel Vanmaekelbergh Journal: J Phys Chem C Nanomater Interfaces Date: 2018-05-14 Impact factor: 4.126