Literature DB >> 28502280

A Feedback-Controlled Mandibular Positioner Identifies Individuals With Sleep Apnea Who Will Respond to Oral Appliance Therapy.

John E Remmers1,2, Zbigniew Topor1,2, Joshua Grosse2, Nikola Vranjes3, Erin V Mosca2, Rollin Brant4, Sabina Bruehlmann2, Shouresh Charkhandeh2,3, Seyed Abdolali Zareian Jahromi1,2.   

Abstract

STUDY
OBJECTIVES: Mandibular protruding oral appliances represent a potentially important therapy for obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). However, their clinical utility is limited by a less-than-ideal efficacy rate and uncertainty regarding an efficacious mandibular position, pointing to the need for a tool to assist in delivery of the therapy. The current study assesses the ability to prospectively identify therapeutic responders and determine an efficacious mandibular position.
METHODS: Individuals (n = 202) with OSA participated in a blinded, 2-part investigation. A system for identifying therapeutic responders was developed in part 1 (n = 149); the predictive accuracy of this system was prospectively evaluated on a new population in part 2 (n = 53). Each participant underwent a 2-night, in-home feedback-controlled mandibular positioner (FCMP) test, followed by treatment with a custom oral appliance and an outcome study with the oral appliance in place. A machine learning classification system was trained to predict therapeutic outcome on data obtained from FCMP studies on part 1 participants. The accuracy of this trained system was then evaluated on part 2 participants by examining the agreement between prospectively predicted outcome and observed outcome. A predicted efficacious mandibular position was derived from each FCMP study.
RESULTS: Predictive accuracy was as follows: sensitivity 85%; specificity 93%; positive predictive value 97%; and negative predictive value 72%. Of participants correctly predicted to respond to therapy, the predicted mandibular protrusive position proved efficacious in 86% of cases.
CONCLUSIONS: An unattended, in-home FCMP test prospectively identifies individuals with OSA who will respond to oral appliance therapy and provides an efficacious mandibular position. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: The trial that this study reports on is registered on www.clinicaltrials.gov, ID NCT03011762, study name: Feasibility and Predictive Accuracy of an In-Home Computer Controlled Mandibular Positioner in Identifying Favourable Candidates for Oral Appliance Therapy.
© 2017 American Academy of Sleep Medicine

Entities:  

Keywords:  home sleep test; obstructive sleep apnea; oral appliance therapy; predictive accuracy; sleep-disordered breathing

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28502280      PMCID: PMC5482578          DOI: 10.5664/jcsm.6656

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Sleep Med        ISSN: 1550-9389            Impact factor:   4.062


  62 in total

1.  A simplified model of screening questionnaire and home monitoring for obstructive sleep apnoea in primary care.

Authors:  Ching Li Chai-Coetzer; Nick A Antic; L Sharn Rowland; Peter G Catcheside; Adrian Esterman; Richard L Reed; Helena Williams; Sandra Dunn; R Doug McEvoy
Journal:  Thorax       Date:  2011-01-20       Impact factor: 9.139

2.  Selection of response criteria affects the success rate of oral appliance treatment for obstructive sleep apnea.

Authors:  Tatsuya Fukuda; Satoru Tsuiki; Mina Kobayashi; Hideaki Nakayama; Yuichi Inoue
Journal:  Sleep Med       Date:  2014-01-27       Impact factor: 3.492

3.  Performance of Remotely Controlled Mandibular Protrusion Sleep Studies for Prediction of Oral Appliance Treatment Response.

Authors:  Kate Sutherland; Joachim Ngiam; Peter A Cistulli
Journal:  J Clin Sleep Med       Date:  2017-03-15       Impact factor: 4.062

4.  Sleepiness-related accidents in sleep apnea patients.

Authors:  S Horstmann; C W Hess; C Bassetti; M Gugger; J Mathis
Journal:  Sleep       Date:  2000-05-01       Impact factor: 5.849

5.  The effect of positional dependency on outcomes of treatment with a mandibular advancement device.

Authors:  Chul-Hee Lee; Hahn Jin Jung; Woo Hyun Lee; Chae Seo Rhee; In-Young Yoon; Pil-Young Yun; Jeong-Whun Kim
Journal:  Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2012-05

6.  A new method for measuring daytime sleepiness: the Epworth sleepiness scale.

Authors:  M W Johns
Journal:  Sleep       Date:  1991-12       Impact factor: 5.849

7.  Effects of an oral appliance with different mandibular protrusion positions at a constant vertical dimension on obstructive sleep apnea.

Authors:  Ghizlane Aarab; Frank Lobbezoo; Hans L Hamburger; Machiel Naeije
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2009-06-18       Impact factor: 3.573

8.  Titrated mandibular advancement versus positive airway pressure for sleep apnoea.

Authors:  F Gagnadoux; B Fleury; B Vielle; B Pételle; N Meslier; X L N'Guyen; W Trzepizur; J L Racineux
Journal:  Eur Respir J       Date:  2009-03-26       Impact factor: 16.671

Review 9.  Obstructive sleep apnea: implications for cardiac and vascular disease.

Authors:  Abu S M Shamsuzzaman; Bernard J Gersh; Virend K Somers
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2003-10-08       Impact factor: 56.272

10.  Remotely controlled mandibular protrusion during sleep predicts therapeutic success with oral appliances in patients with obstructive sleep apnea.

Authors:  John Remmers; Shouresh Charkhandeh; Joshua Grosse; Zbigniew Topor; Rollin Brant; Peter Santosham; Sabina Bruehlmann
Journal:  Sleep       Date:  2013-10-01       Impact factor: 5.849

View more
  7 in total

1.  Remotely Controlled Mandibular Positioning During Drug-Induced Sleep Endoscopy Toward Mandibular Advancement Device Therapy: Feasibility and Protocol.

Authors:  Chloé Kastoer; Marijke Dieltjens; Sara Op de Beeck; Marc J Braem; Paul H Van de Heyning; Olivier M Vanderveken
Journal:  J Clin Sleep Med       Date:  2018-08-15       Impact factor: 4.062

2.  In-home mandibular repositioning during sleep using MATRx plus predicts outcome and efficacious positioning for oral appliance treatment of obstructive sleep apnea.

Authors:  Erin V Mosca; Sabina Bruehlmann; Shaelynn M Zouboules; Alexandra E Chiew; Curtis Westersund; Dillon A Hambrook; Seyed A Zareian Jahromi; Joshua Grosse; Zbigniew L Topor; Shouresh Charkhandeh; John E Remmers
Journal:  J Clin Sleep Med       Date:  2022-03-01       Impact factor: 4.062

3.  Mandibular Advancement Splint Therapy.

Authors:  Anna M Mohammadieh; Kate Sutherland; Andrew S L Chan; Peter A Cistulli
Journal:  Adv Exp Med Biol       Date:  2022       Impact factor: 3.650

Review 4.  Oral Appliance Therapy for Obstructive Sleep Apnoea: State of the Art.

Authors:  Kate Sutherland; Peter A Cistulli
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2019-12-02       Impact factor: 4.241

5.  An interim oral appliance as a screening tool during drug-induced sleep endoscopy to predict treatment success with a mandibular advancement device for obstructive sleep apnea.

Authors:  Pien Fenneke Nicole Bosschieter; Julia A M Uniken Venema; Patty E Vonk; Madeline J L Ravesloot; Joost W Vanhommerig; A Hoekema; Joanneke M Plooij; F Lobbezoo; Nico de Vries
Journal:  Sleep Breath       Date:  2022-08-09       Impact factor: 2.655

6.  Efficacy and Effectiveness of the ProSomnus® [IA] Sleep Device for the Treatment of Obstructive Sleep Apnea: EFFECTS Study.

Authors:  Jordan Stern; Kiwon Lee; Dave Kuhns; Jesse F Martinez-Kratz
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2021-06-02

Review 7.  Oral Appliances in Obstructive Sleep Apnea.

Authors:  Marijke Dieltjens; Olivier Vanderveken
Journal:  Healthcare (Basel)       Date:  2019-11-08
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.