| Literature DB >> 28501952 |
Daisuke Harada1, Noriyuki Namba2, Yuki Hanioka1, Kaoru Ueyama1, Natsuko Sakamoto1, Yukako Nakano1, Masafumi Izui1, Yuiko Nagamatsu1, Hiroko Kashiwagi1, Miho Yamamuro1, Yoshihito Ishiura1, Ayako Ogitani3, Yoshiki Seino1.
Abstract
The objective of this study was to evaluate the gain in final height of achondroplasia (ACH) patients with long-term growth hormone (GH) treatment. We analyzed medical data of 22 adult patients (8 males and 14 females) treated with GH at a dose of 0.05 mg/kg/day. Optionally, tibial lengthening (TL) was performed with the Ilizalov method in 15 patients and TL as well as femoral lengthening (FL) in 6 patients. Concomitant gonadal suppression therapy with buserelin acetate was applied in 13 patients. The mean treatment periods with GH were 10.7 ± 4.0 and 9.3 ± 2.5 years for males and females, respectively. GH treatment augmented the final height +0.60 ± 0.52 SD (+3.5 cm) and +0.51 ± 1.29 SD (+2.8 cm) in males and females compared to non-treated ACH patients, respectively. Final height of ACH patients that underwent GH and TL increased +1.72 ± 0.72 SD (+10.0 cm) and +1.95 ± 1.34 SD (+9.8 cm) in males and females, respectively. GH, TL, and FL increased their final height +2.97 SD (+17.2 cm) and +3.41 ± 1.63 SD (+17.3 cm) in males and females, respectively. Gonadal suppression therapy had no impact on final height.Entities:
Keywords: Achondroplasia; Final height; Gonadal suppression; Growth hormone; Limb lengthening
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28501952 PMCID: PMC5486548 DOI: 10.1007/s00431-017-2923-y
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Eur J Pediatr ISSN: 0340-6199 Impact factor: 3.183
Fig. 1Enrollment and follow-up. One hundred twelve patients were registered as “chondrodystrophy” in our institution. Sixty patients with hypochondroplasia and other skeletal dysplasias were excluded. A total of 52 ACH patients were enrolled in this study. No clinical data of 12 patients were available. Medical information of 40 patients with ACH who had received GH treatment was obtained through medical records and/or questionnaires. GH treatment is ongoing in 16 patients and 2 patients had discontinued GH treatment due to severe deformation of their spine and lower extremity. Twenty-two patients (8 males and 14 females) had reached final height and were included in the analysis. Pretreatment data of two males and one female were partially missing. Among these 22 patients, seven (three males and four females) were treated only with GH, nine (four males and five females) underwent TL in addition to GH, and six (one male and five females) underwent FL in addition to GH and TL. Concomitant gonadal suppression therapy was performed in 13 patients (3 males and 10 females). GH growth hormone, ACH achondroplasia, TL tibial lengthening, FL femoral lengthening
Fig. 2GH treatment improves final height in ACH patients. Growth curves of each patient with ACH who had long-term GH treatment. The black lines indicate the mean ± SD of the patients. The gray dotted lines show the average curves of non-treated patients with ACH according to reference 2. Following GH treatment, 69% (11/16) of the patients maintained height above average. Since the ages when GH was started differ among patients, the mean heights at age 3 years do not match the height SD scores at the start of the treatment in Table 1. GH growth hormone, ACH achondroplasia
Fig. 3Overall effect of comprehensive treatment. a Comparison of ACH-SD scores (∆ACH-SD). GH treatment alone (n = 22) increased ACH-SD scores by +0.60 ± 0.52 SD for males (p < 0.05) and +0.51 ± 1.29 SD for females (p < 0.05). Final height ACH-SD scores attained with the combination of GH and TL (n = 15) were +1.85 ± 1.16 SD (p < 0.01) (+1.72 ± 0.72 SD and +1.95 ± 1.34 SD for males and females, respectively). The combination of GH, TL, and FL (n = 6) increased final height ACH-SD scores +3.27 ± 1.46 SD (p < 0.01) (+2.97 SD and +3.41 ± 1.63 SD for males and females, respectively). b Calculated final height based on ∆ACH-SD scores. GH growth hormone, ACH achondroplasia, TL tibial lengthening, FL femoral lengthening
Background of the patients
| Male | Female | |
|---|---|---|
| Number of patients | 8 | 14 |
| Age at start of treatment (years) | 5.2 ± 3.9 (3.0 to 14.0) | 5.5 ± 2.7 (3.0 to 11.0) |
| Height SD score at GH initiation (SD) | −5.11 ± 0.84 (−5.89 to −4.46) | −5.22 ± 1.33 (−7.16 to −3.42) |
| Height ACH-SD score at GH initiation (SD) | 0.05 ± 0.80 (−1.43 to 1.40) | −0.28 ± 1.35 (−2.35 to 1.94) |
Effect of limb lengthening
| No. of patients | TLV | SHG | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tibial lengthening | Males | 5 | 8.1 ± 1.6 (6.4 to 10.2) | 6.9 ± 2.4 (5.1 to 10.2) |
| Females | 10 | 8.2 ± 2.2 (3.1 to 10.0) | 8.9 ± 2.3 (5.0 to 13.0) | |
| Total | 15 | 8.2 ± 2.0 | 8.3 ± 2.4 | |
| Femoral lengthening | Males | 1 | 10.7 | 7.0 |
| Females | 5 | 8.6 ± 1.1 (8.5 to 10.0) | 6.9 ± 2.1 (3.6 to 9.0) | |
| Total | 6 | 9.0 ± 1.3 | 7.0 ± 1.9 | |
Values are mean ± SD (range)
TLV theoretical lengthening value, SHG standing height gain
Effect of gonadal suppression therapy in addition to GH treatment
| Gonadal suppression therapy | - | + |
|---|---|---|
| Number of patients | 9 | 13 |
| ACH-SD score at GH initiation | 0.12 ± 1.23 (−1.60 to 1.46) | −0.32 ± 1.20 (−2.35 to 1.94) |
| ACH-SD score at final height | 0.51 ± 1.17 (−0.89 to 2.75) | 0.29 ± 1.08 (−1.40 to 2.15) |
| Height ΔACH-SD score (SD) | 0.42 ± 0.67 (−0.57 to 1.29) | 0.58 ± 0.86 (−0.40 to 2.05) |
Values are mean ± SD (range)
|
|
|
|