| Literature DB >> 28500483 |
Olof Thoreson1,2, Lars Ekström3, Hans-Arne Hansson4, Carl Todd3,5, Wisam Witwit6, Anna Swärd Aminoff3, Pall Jonasson7, Adad Baranto3.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The biomechanical mechanisms of failure of FSUs have been studied but the correlation of repetitive flexion and extension loadings to the initial phase of fatigue in young FSUs are still not known. The purpose of the study was to examine the fatigue results of low magnitude repetitive flexion and extension loading on porcine lumbar Functional Spinal Units (FSUs) with Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) and histology.Entities:
Keywords: Animal experimentation; End plate histology; Fatigue; Growth zone injury; In vitro; Intervertebral disc; MRI; Repetitive loading; Spine
Year: 2017 PMID: 28500483 PMCID: PMC5429315 DOI: 10.1186/s40634-017-0091-7
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Exp Orthop ISSN: 2197-1153
Fig. 1Schematic view of the experimental set up in the MTS testing machine
Fig. 2Sagittal location of pivot point according to flexion (a) and extension (c) in relation to the most dorsal point of vertebrae (b)
Basic characteristics of the FSUs
| FSU | Load | Angle | Level | Distance from B-line |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Flexion | 10 | L4–L5 | 10 |
| 2 | Flexion | 12 | L2–L3 | 11 |
| 3 | Flexion | 12 | L4–L5 | 12 |
| 4 | Flexion | 10 | L2–L3 | 12 |
| 5 | Flexion | 10 | L4–L5 | 13 |
| 6 | Flexion | 13 | L2–L3 | 12 |
| 7 | Flexion | 15 | L4–L5 | 12 |
| 8 | Flexion | 15 | L2–L3 | 14 |
| 9 | Extension | 9 | Th12–L1 | 10 |
| 10 | Extension | 10 | L2–L3 | 10 |
| 11 | Extension | 10 | L4–L5 | 10 |
| 12 | Extension | 9 | Th12–L1 | 10 |
| 13 | Extension | 9 | L2–L3 | 10 |
| 14 | Extension | 8 | Th12–L1 | 10 |
| 15 | Extension | 9 | Th12–L1 | 10 |
| 16 | Extension | 10 | L4–L5 | 10 |
Angle in degrees. FSU Functional spinal unit. Distance in mm. B-line as in Fig. 2
MRI signal of the vertebral bodies of the loaded FSUs
| FSU | Superior growth zone, V/D | Superior vertebral body, V/D | Inferior growth zone, V/D | Inferior vertebral body, V/D |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | -/- | +/0 | 0/0 | 0/- |
| 2 | -/- | +/0 | -/- | -/0 |
| 3 | -/- | 0/0 | -/- | 0/0 |
| 4 | -/- | +/+ | -/- | +/+ |
| 5 | -/- | +/+ | -/- | 0/0 |
| 6 | -/- | +/+ | 0/0 | 0/0 |
| 7 | -/- | +/- | -/- | 0/0 |
| 8 | -/- | +/+ | -/- | +/+ |
| 9 | -/- | +/+ | 0/0 | 0/+ |
| 10 | -/0 | +/+ | -/- | +/- |
| 11 | -/- | +/0 | -/- | +/+ |
| 12 | 0/0 | +/+ | 0/0 | +/+ |
| 13 | -/- | +/+ | -/- | +/0 |
| 14 | -/- | +/+ | -/- | +/+ |
| 15 | -/- | 0/0 | -/- | 0/+ |
| 16 | -/- | +/+ | -/- | -/0 |
| Control 1 | 0/0 | 0/0 | 0/0 | 0/0 |
| Control 2 | 0/0 | 0/0 | 0/0 | 0/0 |
| Control 3 | 0/0 | 0/0 | 0/0 | 0/0 |
According to superior or inferior vertebra and ventral (V) or dorsal (D) location of the FSUs. Grading as reduced (-), normal (0) or increased (+)
Fig. 3Un-loaded control (a) and FSU after repetitive flexion (b). Decreased signal in both the superior (1) and inferior growth zones (2) and endplates in the flexed FSU. Un-loaded control (c) and FSU after repetitive extension (d). Reduced signal in the superior growth zone (1) and in inferior end plate (2) in the extended FSU
MRI of the discs of the loaded FSUs
| FSU | Pfirrman grade | Disc height | End plate signal S/I |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | - | -/- |
| 2 | 2 | 0 | -/- |
| 3 | 1 | - | -/- |
| 4 | 1 | - | -/- |
| 5 | 2 | - | -/- |
| 6 | 1 | - | -/- |
| 7 | 1 | 0 | -/- |
| 8 | 1 | - | 0/- |
| 9 | 1 | - | 0/0 |
| 10 | 1 | 0 | 0/- |
| 11 | 1 | 0 | 0/0 |
| 12 | 1 | 0 | 0/- |
| 13 | 1 | - | 0/- |
| 14 | 2 | - | 0/- |
| 15 | 1 | - | 0/- |
| 16 | 1 | - | 0/- |
| Control 1 | 1 | 0 | 0/0 |
| Control 2 | 1 | 0 | 0/0 |
| Control 3 | 1 | 0 | 0/0 |
According to superior (S) or inferior (I) vertebra of the FSUs. Grading as reduced (-), normal (0) or increased (+)
The area (%) of unstained parts of the epiphyseal growth zone
| Group | Mean | Standard deviation | Median | Range |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Vibrated | 29 | 12 | 25 | 16–53 |
| Flexion | 38 | 10 | 38 | 22–53 |
| Extension | 21 | 4 | 20 | 16–28 |
| Controls | 4 | 2 | 4 | 2–6 |
Statistical analyze was not conducted due to low sample size
Fig. 4Histological overview of a flexed FSU. Highlighted are the cranial-anterior growth zone (1) and the caudal-posterior growth zone (2). Sizebar in cm. Haematoxylin-eosin and Alcian blue solution stain
Fig. 5Visualization of the histological results. Control (a), flexion (b) and extension (c) FSUs, where the reduction of intracellular content (1) and extracellular matrix (2) are highlighted with white arrows. Sizebar in mm. Haematoxylin-eosin and Alcian blue solution stain