Literature DB >> 28499348

Total delay in treatment among tuberculous meningitis patients in China: a retrospective cohort study.

Yu He1,2, Chao Han3, Kai-Feng Chang4, Mao-Shui Wang5, Tian-Ren Huang6.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Currently, there is limited data on the risk factors associated with treatment delay in tuberculous meningitis (TBM). This study aimed to assess the duration of delay in the treatment TBM and to investigate its determinants.
METHODS: During the period from September 2009 to February 2016, a retrospective cohort study of consecutive TBM patients admitted to our hospital was conducted to determine the risk factors associated with treatment delay in TBM. Treatment delay duration was defined as the time interval from onset of symptoms (by patient recall) to initiation of treatment and was stratified into two categories: ≤ 20 days, >20 days (median delay day is 20 days). Data collected included demography, comorbidity, cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) examinations and others. Univariable and multivariable logistic regression analysis was used to evaluate the determinants of treatment delay.
RESULTS: A total of 161 TBM patients were included in our study, all were confirmed by CSF mycobacterial culture. The median treatment delay for all patients included in the study was 20 days [interquartile range, 14-60 days]. Multivariate analysis revealed that age (≤21 years old, OR = 0.202, 95% CI: 0.079, 0.521), fever (OR = 0.414, 95% CI: 0.180, 0.952), and headache (OR = 0.204, 95% CI: 0.095, 0.442) had significantly lower risk for treatment delay, while multiple healthcare contact (>3 times) (OR = 3.938, 95% CI: 1.326, 11.691) as well as CSF chloride (>111 mmol/L) (OR = 2.479, 95% CI: 1.143, 5.377) had significantly higher risk of the delay.
CONCLUSIONS: Our findings indicate that multiple healthcare contact and high CSF chloride predict the risk of long delay, while young age, fever and headache are associated with short delay. Maintained focus on awareness of TBM in the population and in healthcare systems, and continuous implementation of diagnostic methods for TBM to detect the disease early, may reduce the mortality and morbidity.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Factor; Treatment delay; Tuberculous meningitis

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28499348      PMCID: PMC5429562          DOI: 10.1186/s12879-017-2447-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMC Infect Dis        ISSN: 1471-2334            Impact factor:   3.090


Background

Tuberculosis (TB) remains a severe global public health threat. In 2014, 9.6 million people are estimated to have fallen ill with TB, and 1.5 million people died from TB [1]. TB usually affects the lungs, but it also can affect any other organ of the body, e.g. lymph nodes, pleura, or meninges. Tuberculous meningitis (TBM) occurs in approximately 1% of all patients with active TB, but is disproportionately important because it kills or severely disables about half of the people affected [2]. TBM is the most severe form of TB and a medical emergency. A number of factors have been reported to be associated with poor outcome. Some of these factors are diagnosis delay; severity of TBM at the time of admission; the presence of headache, fever and hydrocephalus; high cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) protein and lactate concentration [3, 4]. Rapid diagnosis and early treatment before the occurrence of progression of stage are crucial for the outcome of TBM. A study conducted in Taiwan, showed that 47.6% of patients experienced delay in initiating appropriate treatment [3]. Until now, several studies have proved that treatment delay is strongly associated with poor outcomes in adults or children [2, 5–9]. Factors affecting treatment delay are of key importance in TB management as delay may increase mortality [10]. Understanding the factors related to delay in treatment of disease is essential to reduce morbidity and mortality of TBM, and decreases the risk of mortality. However, there is limited data on the risk factors associated with treatment delay. This study aimed to assess the duration of delay in the treatment of TBM and to investigate its determinants. The findings of our study may be useful for management of TBM in the field of improving diagnosis, increasing physician awareness, control planning and policies in China.

Methods

Study design and population

This study was approved by the Human Research Ethics Committees of Shandong Provincial Chest Hospital (SPCH) and First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University. This retrospective study was carried out in Jinan city, China during the period from September 2009 to February 2016. We conducted a retrospective cohort study of consecutive TBM patients admitted to SPCH to determine the risk factors associated with treatment delay. TBM was defined as positive CSF mycobacterial culture. Delay was measured in days. Treatment delay duration was defined as the time interval from onset of symptoms (by patient recall) to initiation of treatment and was stratified into two categories: ≤ 20 days (short delay), >20 days (long delay).

Data collection

Data were collected by a questionnaire filled out by accessing medical records. Data collected included (1) demography (gender, age, symptoms (fever, headache, cough, vomiting, coma), previous anti-tuberculosis therapy, smoking habit, contact history of TB, hydrocephalus, and time during hospitaliziation); (2) comorbidity (pulmonary TB, extrapulmonary TB, diabetes mellitus, rheumatic diseases, miliary TB, recurrent TB); (3) CSF examinations (white blood cell (WBC), mononuclear cells, polynuclear cells, glucose, lactate, tryptophan, aspartate transaminase, lactate dehydrogenase, total protein, α-hydrooxybutyrate dehyrogenase, chloride, adenosine deaminase); (4) others (serum glucose).

Data analysis

Patient characteristics were summarised using means and standard deviations for continuous variables and counts/percentages for categorical variables. Univariate analysis was carried out using the χ2 test or Fisher exact test for categorical data and the Mann-Whitney U test for continuous variables. Beyond descriptive statistics, associations between the dependent variables (treatment delay) and the independent variables were analyzed by calculating the Odds Ratios (OR) and 95% confidence interval (CI). Multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to evaluate risk factors for the delay, using selection of factors associated with delay in univariate analysis (P < 0.1) or those known to have clinical significance. The Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness-of-fit test was performed to assess the overall fit of the model. A two-sided P-value <0.05 was considered significant for all analyses. Data analysis was carried out using SPSS 18.0 (IBM Corp., Armonk, United States).

Results

Baseline patient characteristics

Table 1 shows the characteristics of the participants of this study. A total of 161 TBM patients were included in our study, all were confirmed by CSF mycobacterial culture. Males comprised 54.7% of the participants. Smokers constituted 16.8% of participants. Nineteen patients had anti-TB therapy before admission to our hospital, and 18 patients had contact of TB history. Among them, 109 (67.7%) participants had pulmonary tuberculosis, 48 (29.8%) had extrapulmonary tuberculosis (excluding TBM), 8 had rheumatic diseases, 11 had diabetes mellitus, 51 had millary TB, 12 had recurrent TB. Fever was the most frequently reported symptom (72.0%) followed by headache (55.9%), vomiting (19.3%), cough (18.6%) and hydrocephalus (11.2%). Twenty five patients (15.5%) were diagnosed after one health care contact, 63 (39.1%) after two visits, 48 (29.8%) after three visits, 17 (10.6%) after four visits, and 8 (5.0%) after five or more visits. Results of CSF examinations are also summarized in Table 1.
Table 1

Univariate analysis of risk factors associated with treatment delay in TBM patients

Short delayLong delayTotal P value
N8477161
Age (years)28.3 ± 16.934.1 ± 17.231.1 ± 17.20.037
Sex (male)4840880.509
Time during hospitalization (days)56.6 ± 44.664.6 ± 47.160.4 ± 45.90.273
Fees ($)78,721 ± 71,92298,186 ± 108,77088,030 ± 91,6450.192
Previous anti-TB therapy514190.022
Smoking habit (pack-years)2.82 ± 9.103.36 ± 11.93.08 ± 10.500.746
Contact history of TB108180.761
No. of Healthcare visits2.3 ± 0.92.8 ± 1.32.5 ± 1.10.010
Comorbidity
 Pulmonary TB54551090.334
 Extrapulmonary TB2325480.481
 Rheumatic diseases3580.401
 Diabetes mellinus38110.434
 Milliary TB2229510.120
 Recurrent TB39120.064
Symptoms
 Fever68481160.010
 Headache6327900.000
 Vomitting238310.008
 Cough1020300.025
 Hydrocephalus135180.147
 Abnormalty in brain CT3727640.941
CSF examination
 WBC (109/L)207 ± 210187 ± 183198 ± 1980.524
 Mononuclear cells (%)64 ± 2854 ± 2859 ± 290.041
 Polynuclear cells (%)36 ± 2946 ± 2841 ± 280.037
 Glucose (mmol/L)1.96 ± 1.212.26 ± 1.812.11 ± 1.530.223
 Tryptophan (+)59491080.708
 Lactate (mmol/L)6.75 ± 2.376.40 ± 2.436.58 ± 2.390.410
 AST (U/L)18.7 ± 16.517.8 ± 10.518.3 ± 13.90.671
 LDH (U/L)136 ± 209120 ± 138129 ± 1780.569
 CSF-PR (mg/L)1323 ± 6491456 ± 7581387 ± 7040.230
 α-HBDH (U/L)131 ± 40270 ± 73102 ± 2960.257
 Chloride (mmol/L)108 ± 8111 ± 8109 ± 80.038
 ADA (U/L)8.1 ± 8.18.5 ± 6.48.3 ± 7.30.738
 CSF/Serum glucose0.32 ± 0.180.32 ± 0.180.32 ± 0.180.932
Serum glucose (mmol/L)6.30 ± 1.547.07 ± 3.276.66 ± 2.530.084
Univariate analysis of risk factors associated with treatment delay in TBM patients

Treatment delay

The median treatment delay for all patients included in the study was 20 days (interquartile range, 14–60 days). For 77 (47.8%) patients, the treatment delay was >20 days. Table 1 shows the univariate analysis on risk factors, comparing patients with total delay of >20 days with patients with total delay of ≤20 days. The delay was associated with age, previous anti-TB therapy, multiple healthcare contact, symptoms (fever, headache, vomiting and cough), and CSF examinations (mononuclear and polynuclear cell concentration, and chloride) (all P < 0.05) (Table 1). Further multivariate analysis revealed that age (≤21 years old, OR = 0.202, 95% CI: 0.079, 0.521), fever (OR = 0.414, 95% CI: 0.180, 0.952), and headache (OR = 0.204, 95% CI: 0.095, 0.442) had significantly lower risk for treatment delay, while multiple healthcare contact (>3 times) (OR = 3.938, 95% CI: 1.326, 11.691) as well as CSF chloride (>111 mmol/L) (OR = 2.479, 95% CI: 1.143, 5.377) had significantly higher risk of the delay (Table 2).
Table 2

Multivariate analysis of risk factors associated with treatment delay in TBM patients

P valueOR95% CI
Age (≤21 years old)0.0010.2020.079, 0.521
Fever0.0380.4140.180, 0.952
Headache0.0000.2040.095, 0.442
No. of Healthcare visits (>3 times)0.0143.9381.326, 11.691
Chloride (>111 mmol/L)0.0222.4791.143, 5.377
Multivariate analysis of risk factors associated with treatment delay in TBM patients

Discussion

Although TBM is a medical emergency, our study shows that a significant delay in treatment among TBM patients. Here, we found a median treatment delay time of 20 days in TBM patients. Early detection of cases and treating TBM patients are one of the strategies to reduce the disease’s morbidity and mortality throughout the world. The treatment delay in TBM can be divided into the length of patient delay and the diagnosis delay [11]. Identifying the sources of delay is a critical issue for TBM therapy. In our study, the main factors associated with treatment delay in multivariate analysis were age (≤21 years old, OR = 0.202), fever (OR = 0.414), headache (OR = 0.204), multiple healthcare contact (OR = 3.938), and CSF chloride (>111 mmol/L, OR = 2.479). These may be likely explained by three main factors: perceived severity of illness and symptom recognition, lack of specific and rapid diagnostic methods in TBM and quality of health service provision. Firstly, in the study, we found a clear association between treatment delay and clinical symptoms at inclusion, which has not been described before. Our results showed that symptoms, including fever and headache, were protective factors for shortening treatment delay. The two, headache and fever, can be a sign of infection that is localized to central nervous system, which consists of brain and spinal cord, such as meningitis, encephalitis, and a brain abscess. The combination may raise awareness of TBM among them. Younger age was also a protective factor for shortening the delay. This may be explained by the two reasons: 1) student is free of economic pressures, he can spend more time seeking health care; 2) in China, the One-child Policy forced parents to cherish their only child, and it saves much time in seeking health care for their children. Secondly, diagnosing TBM remains a challenge. The early diagnosis of TBM is fundamental to avoiding treatment delay. However, it is always difficult to confirm the clinical suspicion of TBM. TBM presents in a non-specific manner and it is rare to confirm the diagnosis microbiologically even in high resource settings. Currently, there is no single test with optimal sensitivity in patients with suspected TBM. Routine assays, i.e., acid-fast bacillus staining and mycobacterial culture, are insensitive and slow. It was reported that only 10 to 20% of TBM patients were detected by CSF AFB staining [12], while other tests like Xpert MTB/RIF have several limitations including high cost, requirement for a stable electricity supply and short shelf life of consumables [13]. CSF adenosine deaminase has been evaluated and may be used as a supportive test in diagnosis, but is not recommended as a routine diagnostic test for TBM [2, 14, 15]. In our study, CSF chloride (>111 mmol/L) had significantly higher risk of the delay. This may be associated with the two reasons: 1) In practice, once the diagnosis of bacterial meningitis has been excluded, uncommonly low CSF chloride values (<110 mmol/L) may be associated with TBM but not with viral meningitis [16]. Therefore, TBM may be rapid and timely diagnosed relying on the rule by practitioners; 2) decreased CSF chloride was associated with increased intracranial pressure. This may be helpful to shorten the time between symptom onset and first visit to any health care provider. Thirdly, the mean number of visits to health care facilities before the diagnosis was 2.5. This finding could be related to diagnostic challenge in TBM and lack of awareness of TB among health care workers. Under these circumstances, it is easy to neglect many important issues in TBM diagnosis and management, resulting from a lack of experience and expertise which had previously been found to be associated with diagnosis delays [17]. Moreover, in China, poverty has been reported as central factor causing delay in health care seeking [18-20]. Among the TB patients identified in the 4th National TB Survey, 37% ascribed their delays in clinical consultation to financial problems [21]. A majority of health providers believe there would be improved TB treatment compliance and overall control of TB infections if there was a decreased financial burden for patients and families [11]. Besides extent of the free TB diagnosis and treatment, educational attainment and knowledge of TB possibly enhances detection of TBM and shorten diagnosis delays [11]. This study has potential limitations. First, there is no agreed definition of what constitutes an “acceptable” delay. It probably depends on the local health services and the local epidemiological situation, with a shorter delay to be expected when incidence is high [22]. In our study, we used a cut-off interval of 20 days for subsequent analysis which was similar to that found by other authors in TB [7, 23–25]. Second, considering that it was difficult to access to the results of previous CSF examinations and remarkable difference existed in the principles of CSF assays between hospitals, these results of CSF examinations performed at our hospital were used, which may have overestimated the clinical severity. Third, TB is a chronic disease with an insidious start, making it difficult for patients to remember exactly when the symptoms started. Thus, recall bias may occur. Fourth, the results of our study need to be carefully interpreted because this data was based on a single hospital experience, which was not enough to represent the characteristics of TBM in the entire Chinese population. In addition, although several risk factors were discovered, additional studies are required to validate our findings.

Conclusions

Our findings represent a population-based analysis over a long time period and are based on a large dataset. The results clearly show that total delay in treatment of TBM is still high in the study area. Our findings indicate that multiple healthcare contact and high CSF chloride predict the risk of long delay, while younger age, fever and headache are associated with short delay. Maintained focus on awareness of TBM in the population and in healthcare systems and continuous implementation of diagnostic methods for TBM to detect the disease early, may reduce the mortality and morbidity.
  24 in total

Review 1.  Diagnostic value of adenosine deaminase in cerebrospinal fluid for tuberculous meningitis: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  H-B Xu; R-H Jiang; L Li; W Sha; H-P Xiao
Journal:  Int J Tuberc Lung Dis       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 2.373

2.  Patient and health care system delays in Queensland tuberculosis patients, 1985-1998.

Authors:  J Ward; V Siskind; A Konstantinos
Journal:  Int J Tuberc Lung Dis       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 2.373

3.  Determinants of patient choice of medical provider: a case study in rural China.

Authors:  W C Yip; H Wang; Y Liu
Journal:  Health Policy Plan       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 3.344

4.  Tuberculous meningitis in adults: review of 48 cases.

Authors:  R Verdon; S Chevret; J P Laissy; M Wolff
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 9.079

5.  Health care seeking behavior and patient delay in tuberculosis diagnosis.

Authors:  Carlos Podalirio Borges de Almeida; Erika Cavalheiro Skupien; Denise Rossato Silva
Journal:  Cad Saude Publica       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 1.632

Review 6.  Adenosine deaminase and tuberculous meningitis--a systematic review with meta-analysis.

Authors:  Felipe Francisco Tuon; Hermes Ryoiti Higashino; Max Igor Banks Ferreira Lopes; Marcelo Nóbrega Litvoc; Angela Naomi Atomiya; Leila Antonangelo; Olavo Munhoz Leite
Journal:  Scand J Infect Dis       Date:  2010-03

7.  Chloride levels in meningitis.

Authors:  A Ramkissoon; H M Coovadia
Journal:  S Afr Med J       Date:  1988-05-07

8.  Diagnosis and treatment delay among pulmonary tuberculosis patients identified using the Taiwan reporting enquiry system, 2002-2006.

Authors:  Hui-Ping Lin; Chung-Yeh Deng; Pesus Chou
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2009-02-12       Impact factor: 3.295

9.  Clinical, radiological and laboratory findings in 185 children with tuberculous meningitis at a single centre and relationship with the stage of the disease.

Authors:  Ali Güneş; Ünal Uluca; Fesih Aktar; Çapan Konca; Velat Şen; Aydın Ece; Salih Hoşoğlu; Mehmet Ali Taş; Fuat Gürkan
Journal:  Ital J Pediatr       Date:  2015-10-15       Impact factor: 2.638

10.  Clinical presentations, diagnosis, mortality and prognostic markers of tuberculous meningitis in Vietnamese children: a prospective descriptive study.

Authors:  Nguyen Duc Bang; Maxine Caws; Thai Thanh Truc; Tran Ngoc Duong; Nguyen Huy Dung; Dang Thi Minh Ha; Guy E Thwaites; Doortje Heemskerk; Joel Tarning; Laura Merson; Pham Van Toi; Jeremy J Farrar; Marcel Wolbers; Thomas Pouplin; Jeremy N Day
Journal:  BMC Infect Dis       Date:  2016-10-18       Impact factor: 3.090

View more
  7 in total

1.  Epidemiological, clinical characteristics and drug resistance situation of culture-confirmed children TBM in southwest of China: a 6-year retrospective study.

Authors:  Dong-Mei Wang; Qing-Feng Li; Ma Zhu; Gui-Hui Wu; Xi Li; Yuan-Hong Xu; Jing Zhong; Jia Luo; Ying-Jie Li; Bin-Wu Ying; Chuan-Min Tao
Journal:  BMC Infect Dis       Date:  2020-05-01       Impact factor: 3.090

Review 2.  Defeating Paediatric Tuberculous Meningitis: Applying the WHO "Defeating Meningitis by 2030: Global Roadmap".

Authors:  Robindra Basu Roy; Sabrina Bakeera-Kitaka; Chishala Chabala; Diana M Gibb; Julie Huynh; Hilda Mujuru; Naveen Sankhyan; James A Seddon; Suvasini Sharma; Varinder Singh; Eric Wobudeya; Suzanne T Anderson
Journal:  Microorganisms       Date:  2021-04-16

3.  The Sensitivity of Diagnostic Criteria of Marais S, et al. in Confirmed Childhood Tuberculous Meningitis.

Authors:  Mao-Shui Wang; Jun-Li Wang; Xin-Jie Liu; Yan-An Zhang
Journal:  Front Pediatr       Date:  2022-02-16       Impact factor: 3.418

4.  Patient and health system delays before registration among migrant patients with tuberculosis who were transferred out in China.

Authors:  Tao Li; Hui Zhang; Hemant Deepak Shewade; Kyaw Thu Soe; Lixia Wang; Xin Du
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2018-10-19       Impact factor: 2.655

5.  Tuberculosis among Full-Time Teachers in Southeast China, 2005⁻2016.

Authors:  Hongdan Bao; Kui Liu; Zikang Wu; Chengliang Chai; Tieniu He; Wei Wang; Fei Wang; Ying Peng; Xiaomeng Wang; Bin Chen; Jianmin Jiang
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2018-09-17       Impact factor: 3.390

Review 6.  The current global situation for tuberculous meningitis: epidemiology, diagnostics, treatment and outcomes.

Authors:  James A Seddon; Lillian Tugume; Regan Solomons; Kameshwar Prasad; Nathan C Bahr
Journal:  Wellcome Open Res       Date:  2019-11-05

7.  Xpert MTB/RIF Ultra for the Diagnosis of Tuberculous Meningitis: A Small Step Forward.

Authors:  Joseph Donovan; Fiona V Cresswell; Nguyen Thuy Thuong Thuong; David R Boulware; Guy E Thwaites; Nathan C Bahr
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2020-11-05       Impact factor: 9.079

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.