Moderator's view: Predictive models: a prelude to precision nephrology.

Appropriate diagnosis is fundamental in medicine because it sets the basis for the prediction of disease outcome at the single patient level (prognosis) and decisions regarding the most appropriate therapy. However, given the large series of social, clinical and biological factors that determine the likelihood of an individual's future outcome, prognosis only partly depends on diagnosis and aetiology and treatment is not decided solely on the basis of the underlying diagnosis. This issue is crucial in multifactorial diseases like atherosclerosis, where the use of statins has now shifted from 'treating hypercholesterolaemia' to 'treating the risk of adverse cardiovascular events'. Approaches that take due account of prognosis limit the lingering risk of over-diagnosis and maximize the value of prognostic information in the clinical decision process. In the nephrology realm, the application of a well-validated risk equation for kidney failure in Canada led to a 35% reduction in new referrals. Prognostic models based on simple clinical data extractable from clinical files have recently been developed to predict all-cause and cardiovascular mortality in end-stage kidney disease patients. However, research on predictive models in renal diseases remains suboptimal and non-accounting for competing events and measurement errors, and a lack of calibration analyses and external validation are common fallacies in currently available studies. More focus on this blossoming research area is desirable. The nephrology community may now start to apply the best validated risk scores and further test their potential usefulness in chronic kidney disease patients in diverse clinical situations and geographical areas.