BACKGROUND: Outpatient anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) is a promising candidate for US healthcare cost reduction as several studies have demonstrated that overall complications are relatively low and early discharge can preserve high patient satisfaction, low morbidity, and minimal readmission. OBJECTIVE: To compare clinical outcomes and associated costs between inpatient and ambulatory setting ACDF. METHODS: Demographics, comorbidities, emergency department (ED) visits, readmissions, reoperation rates, and 90-d charges were retrospectively analyzed for patients undergoing elective ACDF in California, Florida, and New York from 2009 to 2011 in State Inpatient and Ambulatory Databases. RESULTS: A total of 3135 ambulatory and 46 996 inpatient ACDFs were performed. Mean Charlson comorbidity index, length of stay, and mortality were 0.2, 0.4 d, and 0% in the ambulatory cohort and 0.4, 1.8 d, and 0.04% for inpatients (P < .0001). Ambulatory patients were younger (48.0 vs 53.1) and more likely to be Caucasian. One hundred sixty-eight ambulatory patients (5.4%) presented to the ED within 30 d (mean 11.3 d), 51 (1.6%) were readmitted, and 5 (0.2%) underwent reoperation. Among inpatient surgeries, 2607 patients (5.5%) presented to the ED within 30 d (mean 9.7 d), 1778 (3.8%) were readmitted (mean 6.3 d), and 200 (0.4%) underwent reoperation. Higher Charlson comorbidity index increased rate of ED visits (ambulatory operating room [OR] 1.285, P < .05; inpatient OR 1.289, P < .0001) and readmission (ambulatory OR 1.746, P < .0001; inpatient OR 1.685, P < .0001). Overall charges were significantly lower for ambulatory ACDFs ($33 362.51 vs $74 667.04; P < .0001). CONCLUSION: ACDF can be performed in an ambulatory setting with comparable morbidity and readmission rates, and lower costs, to those performed in an inpatient setting.
BACKGROUND:Outpatient anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) is a promising candidate for US healthcare cost reduction as several studies have demonstrated that overall complications are relatively low and early discharge can preserve high patient satisfaction, low morbidity, and minimal readmission. OBJECTIVE: To compare clinical outcomes and associated costs between inpatient and ambulatory setting ACDF. METHODS: Demographics, comorbidities, emergency department (ED) visits, readmissions, reoperation rates, and 90-d charges were retrospectively analyzed for patients undergoing elective ACDF in California, Florida, and New York from 2009 to 2011 in State Inpatient and Ambulatory Databases. RESULTS: A total of 3135 ambulatory and 46 996 inpatient ACDFs were performed. Mean Charlson comorbidity index, length of stay, and mortality were 0.2, 0.4 d, and 0% in the ambulatory cohort and 0.4, 1.8 d, and 0.04% for inpatients (P < .0001). Ambulatory patients were younger (48.0 vs 53.1) and more likely to be Caucasian. One hundred sixty-eight ambulatory patients (5.4%) presented to the ED within 30 d (mean 11.3 d), 51 (1.6%) were readmitted, and 5 (0.2%) underwent reoperation. Among inpatient surgeries, 2607 patients (5.5%) presented to the ED within 30 d (mean 9.7 d), 1778 (3.8%) were readmitted (mean 6.3 d), and 200 (0.4%) underwent reoperation. Higher Charlson comorbidity index increased rate of ED visits (ambulatory operating room [OR] 1.285, P < .05; inpatient OR 1.289, P < .0001) and readmission (ambulatory OR 1.746, P < .0001; inpatient OR 1.685, P < .0001). Overall charges were significantly lower for ambulatory ACDFs ($33 362.51 vs $74 667.04; P < .0001). CONCLUSION:ACDF can be performed in an ambulatory setting with comparable morbidity and readmission rates, and lower costs, to those performed in an inpatient setting.
Authors: Jason M Cuellar; Edward Nomoto; Ehsan Saadat; Anthony Ma; Patrick Hill; Michael Kropf; Todd H Lanman; Brian Perri; Khawar Siddique; Willis Wagner; Rajeev Rao; Albert Wong; Michael Eng; Stephen Stephan; Neel Anand; Hyun Bae; Alexandre Rasouli Journal: Int J Spine Surg Date: 2021-09-22
Authors: Abhinaba Chatterjee; Nada Rbil; Michael Yancey; Matthew T Geiselmann; Benjamin Pesante; Sariah Khormaee Journal: N Am Spine Soc J Date: 2022-06-12
Authors: Armin Arshi; Christopher Wang; Howard Y Park; Gideon W Blumstein; Zorica Buser; Jeffrey C Wang; Arya N Shamie; Don Y Park Journal: Spine J Date: 2017-11-16 Impact factor: 4.166
Authors: Kimmo Lönnrot; Simo Taimela; Pirjo Toivonen; Pasi Aronen; Anniina Koski-Palken; Janek Frantzen; Ville Leinonen; Marja Silvasti-Lundell; Johannes Förster; Teppo Jarvinen Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2019-11-26 Impact factor: 2.692
Authors: Armin Arshi; Howard Y Park; Gideon W Blumstein; Christopher Wang; Zorica Buser; Jeffrey C Wang; Arya N Shamie; Don Y Park Journal: Spine (Phila Pa 1976) Date: 2018-11-15 Impact factor: 3.241