Literature DB >> 25454415

Improved risk stratification by the integration of the revised international prognostic scoring system with the myelodysplastic syndromes comorbidity index.

M F van Spronsen1, G J Ossenkoppele1, R Holman2, A A van de Loosdrecht3.   

Abstract

Myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) comprise bone marrow failure diseases with a diverse clinical outcome. For improved risk stratification, the International Prognostic Scoring System (IPSS) has recently been revised (IPSS-R). This single-centre study aimed to validate the IPSS-R and to evaluate prior prognostic scoring systems for MDS. We retrospectively analysed 363 patients diagnosed with MDS according to the FAB criteria between 2000 and 2012. The IPSS, MD Anderson Risk Model Score (MDAS), World Health Organisation (WHO)-classification based Prognostic Scoring System (WPSS), refined WPSS (WPSS-R), IPSS-R and MDS-Comorbidity Index (MDS-CI) were applied to 222 patients considered with primary MDS following the WHO criteria and their prognostic power was investigated. According to the IPSS-R, 18 (8%), 81 (37%), 50 (23%), 43 (19%) and 30 (13%) patients were classified as very low, low, intermediate, high and very high risk with, respectively, a median overall survival of 96 (95% Confidence interval (CI) not reached), 49 (95% CI 34-64), 22 (95% CI 0-49), 19 (95% CI 11-27) and 10 (95% CI 6-13) months (p<.000). The IPSS-R showed improved prognostic power as compared to the IPSS, MDAS, WPSS and WPSS-R. Furthermore, the MDS-CI refined the risk stratification of MDS patients stratified according to the IPSS-R. In conclusion, accounting for the disease status by means of the IPSS-R and comorbidity through the MDS-CI considerably improves the prognostic assessment in MDS patients.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Humans; Myelodysplastic syndromes; Prognosis; Retrospective studies; Risk assessment; Risk factors; Survival analysis

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25454415     DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2014.09.016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Cancer        ISSN: 0959-8049            Impact factor:   9.162


  8 in total

1.  Validation of WHO classification-based Prognostic Scoring System (WPSS) for myelodysplastic syndromes and comparison with the revised International Prognostic Scoring System (IPSS-R). A study of the International Working Group for Prognosis in Myelodysplasia (IWG-PM).

Authors:  M G Della Porta; H Tuechler; L Malcovati; J Schanz; G Sanz; G Garcia-Manero; F Solé; J M Bennett; D Bowen; P Fenaux; F Dreyfus; H Kantarjian; A Kuendgen; A Levis; J Cermak; C Fonatsch; M M Le Beau; M L Slovak; O Krieger; M Luebbert; J Maciejewski; S M M Magalhaes; Y Miyazaki; M Pfeilstöcker; M A Sekeres; W R Sperr; R Stauder; S Tauro; P Valent; T Vallespi; A A van de Loosdrecht; U Germing; D Haase; P L Greenberg; M Cazzola
Journal:  Leukemia       Date:  2015-02-27       Impact factor: 11.528

2.  Validation of the revised International Prognostic Scoring System in patients with myelodysplastic syndrome in Japan: results from a prospective multicenter registry.

Authors:  Hiroshi Kawabata; Kaoru Tohyama; Akira Matsuda; Kayano Araseki; Tomoko Hata; Takahiro Suzuki; Hidekazu Kayano; Kei Shimbo; Yuji Zaike; Kensuke Usuki; Shigeru Chiba; Takayuki Ishikawa; Nobuyoshi Arima; Masaharu Nogawa; Akiko Ohta; Yasushi Miyazaki; Kinuko Mitani; Keiya Ozawa; Shunya Arai; Mineo Kurokawa; Akifumi Takaori-Kondo
Journal:  Int J Hematol       Date:  2017-05-11       Impact factor: 2.490

3.  Integrating patient-centered factors in the risk assessment of MDS.

Authors:  Rena J Buckstein
Journal:  Hematology Am Soc Hematol Educ Program       Date:  2019-12-06

4.  Early cytomegalovirus reactivation remains associated with increased transplant-related mortality in the current era: a CIBMTR analysis.

Authors:  Pierre Teira; Minoo Battiwalla; Muthalagu Ramanathan; A John Barrett; Kwang Woo Ahn; Min Chen; Jaime S Green; Ayman Saad; Joseph H Antin; Bipin N Savani; Hillard M Lazarus; Matthew Seftel; Wael Saber; David Marks; Mahmoud Aljurf; Maxim Norkin; John R Wingard; Caroline A Lindemans; Michael Boeckh; Marcie L Riches; Jeffery J Auletta
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2016-02-16       Impact factor: 22.113

5.  Prognosis of patients with intermediate risk IPSS-R myelodysplastic syndrome indicates variable outcomes and need for models beyond IPSS-R.

Authors:  Christopher B Benton; Maliha Khan; David Sallman; Aziz Nazha; Graciela M Nogueras González; Jin Piao; Jing Ning; Fleur Aung; Najla Al Ali; Elias Jabbour; Tapan M Kadia; Gautam Borthakur; Farhad Ravandi; Sherry Pierce; David Steensma; Amy DeZern; Gail Roboz; Mikkael Sekeres; Michael Andreeff; Hagop Kantarjian; Rami S Komrokji; Guillermo Garcia-Manero
Journal:  Am J Hematol       Date:  2018-09-26       Impact factor: 13.265

6.  Part 2: Myelodysplastic syndromes - classification systems.

Authors:  Irene Lorand-Metze; Lígia Niero-Melo; Renata Buzzini; Wanderley Marques Bernardo
Journal:  Hematol Transfus Cell Ther       Date:  2018-07-02

7.  Evaluation of different scoring systems and gene mutations for the prognosis of myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) in Chinese population.

Authors:  Meng-Yi Du; Min Xu; Jun Deng; Lin Liu; Tao Guo; Ling-Hui Xia; Yu Hu; Heng Mei
Journal:  J Cancer       Date:  2020-01-01       Impact factor: 4.207

Review 8.  Sex-Related Differences in Chronic Myeloid Neoplasms: From the Clinical Observation to the Underlying Biology.

Authors:  Theodoros Karantanos; Tania Jain; Alison R Moliterno; Richard J Jones; Amy E DeZern
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2021-03-05       Impact factor: 5.923

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.