| Literature DB >> 28496104 |
Lili Sheng1, Prasant Kumar Jena1, Hui-Xin Liu1, Karen M Kalanetra2, Frank J Gonzalez3, Samuel W French4, Viswanathan V Krishnan1,5, David A Mills2, Yu-Jui Yvonne Wan6.
Abstract
This study aims to uncover how specific bacteria and bile acids (BAs) contribute to steatosis induced by diet and farnesoid X receptor (FXR) deficiency in both genders. A control diet (CD) and Western diet (WD), which contains high fat and carbohydrate, were used to feed wild type (WT) and FXR knockout (KO) mice followed by phenotyping characterization as well as BA and microbiota profiling. Our data revealed that male WD-fed FXR KO mice had the most severe steatosis and highest hepatic and serum lipids as well as insulin resistance among the eight studied groups. Gender differences in WD-induced steatosis, insulin sensitivity, and predicted microbiota functions were all FXR-dependent. FXR deficiency enriched Desulfovibrionaceae, Deferribacteraceae, and Helicobacteraceae, which were accompanied by increased hepatic taurine-conjugated cholic acid and β-muricholic acid as well as hepatic and serum lipids. Additionally, distinct microbiota profiles were found in WD-fed WT mice harboring simple steatosis and CD-fed FXR KO mice, in which the steatosis had a potential to develop into liver cancer. Together, the presented data revealed FXR-dependent concomitant relationships between gut microbiota, BAs, and metabolic diseases in both genders. Gender differences in BAs and microbiota may account for gender dissimilarity in metabolism and metabolic diseases.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28496104 PMCID: PMC5431816 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-017-01576-9
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Figure 1Histological and phenotypic changes in control diet and Western diet-fed wild type and FXR KO mice of both genders. (A) Body weight gain. (B) Percentage of liver to body weight ratio. (C) Serum alanine aminotransferase (ALT). (D) Serum endotoxin level. (E) Representative liver morphology and H&E-stained liver sections. Scale bars, 100 µm. Hepatic triglycerides (F) and cholesterol (G) level. Serum triglycerides (H) and cholesterol (I) level. n = 6 per group. Data are expressed as mean ± SD. One-way ANOVA with Tukey’s correction. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001 for diet comparison; # p < 0.05, ## p < 0.01, ### p < 0.001 for genotype comparison; & p < 0.05, && p < 0.01, &&& p < 0.001 for gender comparison.
Figure 2Insulin and glucose tolerance tests in control diet and Western diet -fed wild type and FXR KO mice of both genders. (A) Blood glucose level after 6 h fasting. (B) Insulin tolerance test (ITT). (C) Glucose tolerance test (GTT). The area under curve (AUC) is showed. n = 6 per group. Data are expressed as mean ± SD. One-way ANOVA with Tukey’s correction. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001 for diet comparison; # p < 0.05, ## p < 0.01, ### p < 0.001 for genotype comparison; & p < 0.05, && p < 0.01, &&& p < 0.001 for gender comparison.
Figure 3Hepatic bile acid profile in control diet and Western diet-fed wild type and FXR KO mice of both genders. (A) Total hepatic bile acids. Data are expressed as mean ± SD. One-way ANOVA with Tukey’s correction, ### p < 0.001 for genotype comparison. (B) Hepatic bile acid profile. n = 16 in male groups, n = 6 in female groups.
Figure 4Hepatic gene expression in control diet and Western diet -fed wild type and FXR KO mice of both genders. (A) Lipid and glucose related genes. (B) Bile acid related genes. n = 6 per group. Data are expressed as mean ± SD. One-way ANOVA with Tukey’s correction. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001 for diet comparison; # p < 0.05, ## p < 0.01, ### p < 0.001 for genotype comparison; & p < 0.05, && p < 0.01, &&& p < 0.001 for gender comparison.
Figure 5Diet and FXR deficiency changed gut microbiota composition in both genders. (A) Cecal microbiota at phylum level. (B) Firmicutes to Bacteroidetes ratio. Principal component analysis plots of cecal microbiota at family level based on diet (C), phenotype (D), and gender difference (E). (F) and (G), relative abundance of cecal microbiota at family level (Kruskal-Wallis test). Box plots display the median, 25th percentile, and 75th percentile; whiskers display minimum and maximum values. (H) Targeted functional quantitative PCR analysis of microbial genes. (B,H), data are expressed as mean ± SD. One-way ANOVA with Tukey’s correction. n = 16 in male groups, n = 6 in female groups. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001 for diet comparison; # p < 0.05, ## p < 0.01, ### p < 0.001 for genotype comparison; & p < 0.05, && p < 0.01, &&& p < 0.001 for gender comparison.
Differentially enriched microbial pathways in each group.
| Group | Number of pathway, examples of differentially enriched pathways in each group | Total number | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
| |||
| Male WT | 15 | • Amino sugar and nucleotide sugar metabolism | 4 | • C5-Branched dibasic acid metabolism | 19 |
| • Photosynthesis | • Naphthalene and ethylbenzene degradation | ||||
| • Alanine-Aspartate and glutamate metabolism | • Cyanoamino acid metabolism | ||||
| Male FXR KO | 2 | • Methane metabolism | 2 | • Photosynthesis | 4 |
| • Lipoic acid metabolism | • Vibriocholerae pathogenic cycle | ||||
| Female WT | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||
| Female FXR KO | 20 | • Starch and sucrose metabolism | 25 | • Bacterial motility and flagellar assembly | 45 |
| • Galactose metabolism | • Fatty acid biosynthesis | ||||
| • Glycolysis and gluconeogenesis | • Neurodegenerative Diseases (Parkinson’s, Huntington’s, Alzheimer’s disease) | ||||
|
|
|
| |||
| CD-fed Male | 29 | • Transporter | 64 | • Lipopolysaccharide biosynthesis | 93 |
| • Fructose and mannose metabolism | • Fatty acid biosynthesis | ||||
| • Fatty acid metabolism | • Neurodegenerative Diseases | ||||
| WD-fed Male | 37 | • Transporter | 74 | • Lipopolysaccharide biosynthesis | 111 |
| • Transcription factors | • Carbon fixation pathway in Prokaryotes | ||||
| • Fructose and mannose metabolism | • Bacterial secretion system | ||||
| CD-fed Female | 53 | • Phosphotransferase system | 48 | • Bacterial motility proteins | 101 |
| • Amino sugar and nucleotide sugar metabolism | • Flagellar assembly | ||||
| • Starch and sucrose metabolism | • Secretion system | ||||
| WD-fed Female | 85 | • Transporter | 76 | • Lipopolysaccharide biosynthesis | 161 |
| • Transcription factors | • Bacterial motility proteins | ||||
| • Fructose and mannose metabolism | • Carbon fixation pathway in Prokaryotes | ||||
|
|
|
| |||
| CD-fed WT | 4 | • Bacterial motility and flagellar assembly | 7 | • G-protein coupled receptors | 11 |
| • Bacterial chemotaxis | • Glycerophospholipid metabolism | ||||
| • Plant pathogen interaction | • Nucleotide excision repair | ||||
| WD-fed WT | 8 | • Methane metabolism | 33 | • Replication recombination and repair | 41 |
| • Starch and sucrose metabolism | • DNA repair and recombination | ||||
| • Cyanoamino acid metabolism | • Fatty acid metabolism | ||||
| CD-fed FXR KO | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||
| WD-fed FXR KO | 23 | • Starch and sucrose metabolism | 34 | • Retinoic acid-inducible gene like receptor signaling pathway | 57 |
| • Methane metabolism | • Bacterial secretion system | ||||
| • Glycolysis and gluconeogenesis | • Metabolism of cofactors and vitamins | ||||
Figure 6Spearman’s correlation analysis. Heatmaps of Spearman’s correlation analysis between abundance of bacterial families and phenotypes, bacterial families and hepatic bile acids (A), between mouse phenotypes and hepatic bile acids (B), and between abundance of bacterial families and genes (C) *p < 0.05.
Figure 7The differences between Western diet-fed wild type mice and control diet-fed FXR KO mice of both genders. (A) Heatmaps of bile acid profile and mouse phenotypes. Bile acids and phenotypes were displayed with fold change (WD-fed WT vs. CD-fed FXR KO) ≥1.5 or ≤0.67 in at least one gender. (B) Principal component analysis plots of cecal microbiota at family level. (C) Bacterial families are shown (mean relative abundance >0.2%) with significant difference between WD-fed WT and CD-fed FXR KO mice in at least one gender.