Amedeo Lonardo1, Fabio Nascimbeni1, Stefano Ballestri2, DeLisa Fairweather3, Sanda Win4, Tin A Than4, Manal F Abdelmalek5, Ayako Suzuki5,6. 1. Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Modena, Modena, Italy. 2. Azienda USL di Modena, Modena, Italy. 3. Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL. 4. University of Southern California Research Center for Liver Diseases, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA. 5. Division of Gastroenterology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC. 6. Division of Gastroenterology, Durham VA Medical Center, Durham, NC.
Abstract
Despite tremendous research advancements in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD), our understanding of sex differences in NAFLD remains insufficient. This review summarizes the current knowledge on sex differences in NAFLD, identifies gaps, and discusses important considerations for future research. The prevalence and severity of NAFLD are higher in men than in women during the reproductive age. However, after menopause, NAFLD occurs at a higher rate in women, suggesting that estrogen is protective. Sex differences also exist for the major risk factors of NAFLD. In general, animal models of NAFLD recapitulate the sex differences observed in patients, with more severe steatosis and steatohepatitis, more proinflammatory/profibrotic cytokines, and a higher incidence of hepatic tumors in male than female subjects. Based on computer modeling, female and male livers are metabolically distinct with unique regulators modulating sex-specific metabolic outcomes. Analysis of the literature reveals that most published clinical and epidemiological studies fail to examine sex differences appropriately. Considering the paucity of data on sex differences and the knowledge that regulators of pathways relevant to current therapeutic targets for NAFLD differ by sex, clinical trials should be designed to test drug efficacy and safety according to sex, age, reproductive stage (i.e., menopause), and synthetic hormone use. Conclusion: Sex differences do exist in the prevalence, risk factors, fibrosis, and clinical outcomes of NAFLD, suggesting that, while not yet incorporated, sex will probably be considered in future practice guidelines; adequate consideration of sex differences, sex hormones/menopausal status, age, and other reproductive information in clinical investigation and gene association studies of NAFLD are needed to fill current gaps and implement precision medicine for patients with NAFLD.
Despite tremendous research advancements in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD), our understanding of sex differences in NAFLD remains insufficient. This review summarizes the current knowledge on sex differences in NAFLD, identifies gaps, and discusses important considerations for future research. The prevalence and severity of NAFLD are higher in men than in women during the reproductive age. However, after menopause, NAFLD occurs at a higher rate in women, suggesting that estrogen is protective. Sex differences also exist for the major risk factors of NAFLD. In general, animal models of NAFLD recapitulate the sex differences observed in patients, with more severe steatosis and steatohepatitis, more proinflammatory/profibrotic cytokines, and a higher incidence of hepatic tumors in male than female subjects. Based on computer modeling, female and male livers are metabolically distinct with unique regulators modulating sex-specific metabolic outcomes. Analysis of the literature reveals that most published clinical and epidemiological studies fail to examine sex differences appropriately. Considering the paucity of data on sex differences and the knowledge that regulators of pathways relevant to current therapeutic targets for NAFLD differ by sex, clinical trials should be designed to test drug efficacy and safety according to sex, age, reproductive stage (i.e., menopause), and synthetic hormone use. Conclusion: Sex differences do exist in the prevalence, risk factors, fibrosis, and clinical outcomes of NAFLD, suggesting that, while not yet incorporated, sex will probably be considered in future practice guidelines; adequate consideration of sex differences, sex hormones/menopausal status, age, and other reproductive information in clinical investigation and gene association studies of NAFLD are needed to fill current gaps and implement precision medicine for patients with NAFLD.
Authors: Zobair Younossi; Maria Stepanova; Janus P Ong; Ira M Jacobson; Elisabetta Bugianesi; Ajay Duseja; Yuichiro Eguchi; Vincent W Wong; Francesco Negro; Yusuf Yilmaz; Manuel Romero-Gomez; Jacob George; Aijaz Ahmed; Robert Wong; Issah Younossi; Mariam Ziayee; Arian Afendy Journal: Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol Date: 2018-06-14 Impact factor: 11.382
Authors: Richard Kirsch; Vivian Clarkson; Enid G Shephard; David A Marais; Mohamed A Jaffer; Vivienne E Woodburne; Ralph E Kirsch; Pauline de la M Hall Journal: J Gastroenterol Hepatol Date: 2003-11 Impact factor: 4.029
Authors: Young-Min Park; Rocio I Pereira; Christopher B Erickson; Tracy A Swibas; Kimberly A Cox-York; Rachael E Van Pelt Journal: PLoS One Date: 2017-05-04 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Carmen Haro; Oriol A Rangel-Zúñiga; Juan F Alcalá-Díaz; Francisco Gómez-Delgado; Pablo Pérez-Martínez; Javier Delgado-Lista; Gracia M Quintana-Navarro; Blanca B Landa; Juan A Navas-Cortés; Manuel Tena-Sempere; José C Clemente; José López-Miranda; Francisco Pérez-Jiménez; Antonio Camargo Journal: PLoS One Date: 2016-05-26 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Sanda Win; Robert Wm Min; Christopher Q Chen; Jun Zhang; Yibu Chen; Meng Li; Ayako Suzuki; Manal F Abdelmalek; Ying Wang; Mariam Aghajan; Filbert Wm Aung; Anna Mae Diehl; Roger J Davis; Tin A Than; Neil Kaplowitz Journal: J Clin Invest Date: 2019-12-02 Impact factor: 14.808
Authors: Wei Perng; Ellen C Francis; Harry A Smith; John Carey; Dongqing Wang; Katerina M Kechris; Dana Dabelea Journal: J Clin Endocrinol Metab Date: 2020-09-01 Impact factor: 5.958
Authors: Aline de Conti; Volodymyr Tryndyak; Rose A Willett; Barbara Borowa-Mazgaj; Anna Watson; Ralph Patton; Sangeeta Khare; Levan Muskhelishvili; Greg R Olson; Mark I Avigan; Carl E Cerniglia; Sharon A Ross; Arun J Sanyal; Frederick A Beland; Ivan Rusyn; Igor P Pogribny Journal: FASEB J Date: 2020-04-18 Impact factor: 5.191
Authors: Jeff Y Yang; Andrew M Moon; Hannah Kim; Virginia Pate; A Sidney Barritt; Matthew J Crowley; John B Buse; Til Stürmer; Anastasia-Stefania Alexopoulos Journal: J Diabetes Complications Date: 2020-08-05 Impact factor: 2.852
Authors: Krishnakant Saboo; Amirhossein Shamsaddini; Mihir V Iyer; Chang Hu; Andrew Fagan; Edith A Gavis; Melanie B White; Michael Fuchs; Douglas M Heuman; Masoumeh Sikaroodi; Ravishankar K Iyer; Patrick M Gillevet; Jasmohan S Bajaj Journal: J Hepatol Date: 2020-07-15 Impact factor: 25.083