BACKGROUND: Second-generation cryoballoon (CB2)-based pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) has demonstrated encouraging clinical results in the treatment of paroxysmal (PAF) and persistent atrial fibrillation (PersAF). However, the CB2 features a maximal diameter of 28 mm, and its adaptability to anatomic variations of the pulmonary veins (PVs) might be challenging. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to assess the acute efficacy, safety, and long-term clinical results of CB2-based PVI in patients with a left common pulmonary vein (LCPV). METHODS: Six hundred seventy consecutive patients underwent CB2-based PVI in 3 electrophysiology centers. In 74 patients (11%), an LCPV was identified (LCPV group). The data were compared to those from matched patients (n = 74) with normal PV anatomy and comparable baseline characteristics (control group). An antral occlusion of the complete LCPV ostium was feasible in 50% of patients in the LCPV group. If an antral occlusion could not be obtained, a sequential isolation of the first superior and inferior branches was applied. RESULTS: All 74 LCPVs were successfully isolated. A total of 64% patients (LCPV group) and 66% patients (control group) remained in sinus rhythm after mean follow-up of 1.9 ± 0.9 years (P = .820). In 18 of 26 patients (69%) with atrial tachyarrhythmia recurrence, a repeat procedure using radiofrequency energy was performed, and a total of 56% LCPVs were found to be persistently isolated (control group: 61% of left-sided PVs, P = .801). CONCLUSION: Patients with an LCPV undergoing CB2-based PVI demonstrate a high acute success rate. Comparable results with regard to clinical success and durability of PVI were shown when comparing patients of the LCPV group and the control group.
BACKGROUND: Second-generation cryoballoon (CB2)-based pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) has demonstrated encouraging clinical results in the treatment of paroxysmal (PAF) and persistent atrial fibrillation (PersAF). However, the CB2 features a maximal diameter of 28 mm, and its adaptability to anatomic variations of the pulmonary veins (PVs) might be challenging. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to assess the acute efficacy, safety, and long-term clinical results of CB2-based PVI in patients with a left common pulmonary vein (LCPV). METHODS: Six hundred seventy consecutive patients underwent CB2-based PVI in 3 electrophysiology centers. In 74 patients (11%), an LCPV was identified (LCPV group). The data were compared to those from matched patients (n = 74) with normal PV anatomy and comparable baseline characteristics (control group). An antral occlusion of the complete LCPV ostium was feasible in 50% of patients in the LCPV group. If an antral occlusion could not be obtained, a sequential isolation of the first superior and inferior branches was applied. RESULTS: All 74 LCPVs were successfully isolated. A total of 64% patients (LCPV group) and 66% patients (control group) remained in sinus rhythm after mean follow-up of 1.9 ± 0.9 years (P = .820). In 18 of 26 patients (69%) with atrial tachyarrhythmia recurrence, a repeat procedure using radiofrequency energy was performed, and a total of 56% LCPVs were found to be persistently isolated (control group: 61% of left-sided PVs, P = .801). CONCLUSION:Patients with an LCPV undergoing CB2-based PVI demonstrate a high acute success rate. Comparable results with regard to clinical success and durability of PVI were shown when comparing patients of the LCPV group and the control group.
Authors: Kivanc Yalin; Amr Abdin; Evgeny Lyan; Noureddin Sawan; Spyridon Liosis; Christian Elsner; Alexander Jobs; Ben Brüggemann; Jelena Koester; Ingo Eitel; Charlotte Eitel; Roland Richard Tilz Journal: Clin Res Cardiol Date: 2018-02-28 Impact factor: 5.460
Authors: Shaojie Chen; Boris Schmidt; Stefano Bordignon; Fabrizio Bologna; Takahiko Nagase; Laura Perrotta; K R Julian Chun Journal: Arrhythm Electrophysiol Rev Date: 2018-03
Authors: Christopher A B Kowalewski; Miguel Rodrigo; Chad Brodt; Francois Haddad; Paul J Wang; Sanjiv M Narayan Journal: Pacing Clin Electrophysiol Date: 2020-02-17 Impact factor: 1.976
Authors: Arash Aryana; Deep K Pujara; Shelley L Allen; James H Baker; Martin A Espinosa; Eric F Buch; Uma Srivatsa; Ethan Ellis; Kevin Makati; Marcin Kowalski; Sung Lee; Thomas Tadros; Tina Baykaner; Amin Al-Ahmad; André d'Avila; Luigi Di Biase; Kaoru Okishige; Andrea Natale Journal: J Interv Card Electrophysiol Date: 2020-10-03 Impact factor: 1.900