Literature DB >> 2849511

The metaphase scaffold is helically folded: sister chromatids have predominantly opposite helical handedness.

E Boy de la Tour1, U K Laemmli.   

Abstract

We have studied the three-dimensional folding of the scaffolding in histone H1-depleted chromosomes by immunofluorescence with an antibody specific for topoisomerase II. Two different types of decondensed chromosomes are observed. The majority of the chromosomes are expanded, and the central fluorescence signal is surrounded by a large halo of chromatin. A much smaller number of chromosomes are more compact in length; they contain a smaller halo of chromatin and their scaffolds are not extended but folded into a genuine, quite regular helical coil. This conclusion is based on a three-dimensional structural analysis by optical sectioning. The number of helical coils is related to chromosome length. Surprisingly, sister chromatids have predominantly opposite helical handedness; that is, they are related by mirror symmetry.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1988        PMID: 2849511     DOI: 10.1016/0092-8674(88)90239-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cell        ISSN: 0092-8674            Impact factor:   41.582


  68 in total

1.  Chiral discotic columnar germs of nucleosome core particles.

Authors:  F Livolant; A Leforestier
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 4.033

2.  Chromosome no. 1 of Crepis capillaris shows defined 3D-shapes in mitotic prophase.

Authors:  A B Houtsmuller; J L Oud; M B Montijn; M Worring; A W Smeulders; N Nanninga
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 5.239

Review 3.  Evidence that replication fork components catalyze establishment of cohesion between sister chromatids.

Authors:  D R Carson; M F Christman
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2001-07-17       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Mitotic chromosome scaffold structure: new approaches to an old controversy.

Authors:  Andrew S Belmont
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2002-12-02       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Mitotic chromosomes are chromatin networks without a mechanically contiguous protein scaffold.

Authors:  Michael G Poirier; John F Marko
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2002-11-18       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 6.  Micromechanical studies of mitotic chromosomes.

Authors:  M G Poirier; J F Marko
Journal:  J Muscle Res Cell Motil       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 2.698

Review 7.  Integrating chromosome structure with function.

Authors:  J B Rattner
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  1992-03       Impact factor: 4.316

8.  Chromosome structure: improved immunolabeling for electron microscopy.

Authors:  Kazuhiro Maeshima; Michail Eltsov; Ulrich K Laemmli
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  2005-11-12       Impact factor: 4.316

9.  Chromosome and replisome dynamics in E. coli: loss of sister cohesion triggers global chromosome movement and mediates chromosome segregation.

Authors:  David Bates; Nancy Kleckner
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2005-06-17       Impact factor: 41.582

Review 10.  SUMO modification of DNA topoisomerase II: trying to get a CENse of it all.

Authors:  Ming-Ta Lee; Jeff Bachant
Journal:  DNA Repair (Amst)       Date:  2009-02-20
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.