| Literature DB >> 28493867 |
Sebastian V Rojas1,2,3, George Kensah1,2,3, Alexander Rotaermel1,2,3, Hassina Baraki1,2,3, Ingo Kutschka1,2,3, Robert Zweigerdt1,2,3, Ulrich Martin1,2,3, Axel Haverich1,2,3, Ina Gruh1,2,3, Andreas Martens1,2,3.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSC) can be differentiated into cardiomyocytes and represent a possible autologous cell source for myocardial repair. We analyzed the engraftment and functional effects of murine iPSC-derived cardiomyocytes (iPSC-CMs) in a murine model of myocardial infarction. METHODS ANDEntities:
Mesh:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28493867 PMCID: PMC5426598 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0173222
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Fig 1Cardiac bodies and cardiomyocytes derived from murine iPSCs.
A: CBs after antibiotic selection (dd14, brightfield view); inset: CBs after CFDA SE tracer staining (dd14). Scale bars: 100μm. B: CBs are positive for cTNT and show CMs with sarcomeric striations (inset, arrow). Scale bar: 50μm. C+D: CBs at dd14 are positive either for MLC2A or MLC2V indicating spontaneous differentiation into both an atrial and ventricular phenotype; negative CBs are marked with *, respectively. Scale bars: 50μm. E+F: Reseeded CMs exhibit a mature sarcomeric intracellular organisation. Staining for cTnT and α-sarcomeric actinin shows Z-lines (arrows). Scale bars: 50μm. G: Relative amount of reseeded CMs expressing cardiac markers α-sarcomeric actinin (99.1±1.5%), cTnT (99.3±0.4%), Titin (99.4±0.3%), MLC2A (47.3±1.9%) and MLC2V (52.1±1.8%); N = 8.
Fig 2Genetically purified iPSC-derived CMs form mature grafts in vivo.
A+B: CFDA SE cell tracer positive iPSC-CM grafts 7 days after intramyocardial transplantation: Adjacent to the host myocardium iPSC-CMs align in a parallel, longitudinal fashion and exhibit sarcomeric structures (arrows). Within central portions of broader grafts (approximately > 200 μm) they maintain a small, round shape (* in A). In the infarct penumbra iPSC-CMs lie in close proximity to host CMs (arrowheads in B1), occasionally with direct cell contact (arrowheads in the bottom right corner of B1). Inside the infarct area iPSC-CMs are typically surrounded by infiltrating host cells (arrowheads in B2). Tissue disruption during histological preparation (* in B1+2) indicates loose cell adhesion within iPSC-CM grafts. C+D: CFDA SE cell tracer positive iPSC-CM graft 28 days after intramyocardial transplantation: The cell tracer remains visible 28 days after engraftment, but iPSC-CMs develop an amorphic appearance. Sarcomeric structures are not observed. Vacuoles form during histological preparation (* in C). A+D: brightfield overlay. Scale bars: 400μm.
Fig 3Graftsize after intramyocardial transplantation of iPSC derived CMs.
Intramyocardial grafts were detected by their CFDA SE fluorescence on POD7 and POD28. Graft size (μl): after 7 days: 7.6±2.5; after 28 days: 0.78±0.21. *** P<0.001.
Fig 4Intramyocardial transplantation of iPSC derived CMs improves ventricular remodeling and function after myocardial infarction.
Hemodynamic evaluation by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI; POD 27; A+B) and conductance catheter analysis (CC; POD 28; C-F). A: Left ventricular ejection fraction (LV-EF [%]) as measured by MRI: On POD 2: Sham28 = 56±5; PBS28 = 39±5; iPSC-CM28 = 47±3. On POD 27: Sham28 = 60±4; PBS28 = 19±2; iPSC-CM28 = 34±4 B: End-diastolic volume (EDV [μl]) as measured by MRI: On POD 2: Sham28 = 34±3; PBS28 = 38±5; iPSC-CM28 = 37±2. On POD 27: Sham28 = 40±3; PBS28 = 99±9; iPSC-CM28 = 73±6 C: LV-EF (%) as measured by CC on POD 28: Sham28 = 59±1; PBS28 = 18±1; iPSC-CM28 = 33±3 D: End-diastolic volume (EDV [μl]) as measured by CC on POD 28: Sham28 = 13±1; PBS28 = 30±1; iPSC-CM28 = 21±2 E: maximum Pressure increase (ΔP/dt max. [mmHg/sec]) as measured by CC on POD 28: Sham28 = 5863±351; PBS28 = 2893±207; iPSC-CM28 = 4135±232 F: Preload adjusted maximal power (mWatts/μl2) as measured by CC on POD 28: Sham28 = 205±23; PBS28 = 20±3; iPSC-CM28 = 62±8. *P<0.05; **P<0.01; ***P<0.001; ****P<0.0001 (for group comparison); ##P<0.01; ###P<0.001; ####P<0.0001 (for paired longitudinal comparison).
Fig 5Intramyocardial transplantation of iPSC derived CMs alleviates adverse myocardial remodeling and increases the amount of viable myocardium.
A: Infarct size (%): after 2 days (MRI): PBS28 = 34±3; iPSC-CM28 = 36±4; after 28 days (Masson’s): PBS28 = 46±3; iPSC-CM28 = 25±4 B: LV wall thickness after 28 days (Masson’s; μm): iPSC-CM7 = 990±57; iPSC-CM28 = 669±64; PBS28 = 328±12 C: Expansion index after 28 days (Masson’s): iPSC-CM7 = 1.1±0.1; iPSC-CM28 = 2.9±0.5; PBS28 = 4.5±0.4 D: Viable myocardium (Masson’s; % of infarct area): iPSC-CM7 = 32±2; iPSC-CM28 = 46±1; PBS28 = 15±1. iPSC-CM28 vs. PBS28: * P<0.05, ** P<0.01, **** P<0.0001. iPSC-CM7 vs. iPSC-CM28: # P<0.05, ##P<0.01; ###P<0.001; ####P<0.0001.