Literature DB >> 28492899

Postmarket Safety Events Among Novel Therapeutics Approved by the US Food and Drug Administration Between 2001 and 2010.

Nicholas S Downing1, Nilay D Shah2, Jenerius A Aminawung3, Alison M Pease4, Jean-David Zeitoun5, Harlan M Krumholz6, Joseph S Ross7.   

Abstract

IMPORTANCE: Postmarket safety events of novel pharmaceuticals and biologics occur when new safety risks are identified after initial regulatory approval of these therapeutics. These safety events can change how novel therapeutics are used in clinical practice and inform patient and clinician decision making.
OBJECTIVES: To characterize the frequency of postmarket safety events among novel therapeutics approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA), and to examine whether any novel therapeutic characteristics known at the time of FDA approval were associated with increased risk. DESIGN AND
SETTING: Cohort study of all novel therapeutics approved by the FDA between January 1, 2001, and December 31, 2010, followed up through February 28, 2017. EXPOSURES: Novel therapeutic characteristics known at the time of FDA approval, including drug class, therapeutic area, priority review, accelerated approval, orphan status, near-regulatory deadline approval, and regulatory review time. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: A composite of (1) withdrawals due to safety concerns, (2) FDA issuance of incremental boxed warnings added in the postmarket period, and (3) FDA issuance of safety communications.
RESULTS: From 2001 through 2010, the FDA approved 222 novel therapeutics (183 pharmaceuticals and 39 biologics). There were 123 new postmarket safety events (3 withdrawals, 61 boxed warnings, and 59 safety communications) during a median follow-up period of 11.7 years (interquartile range [IQR], 8.7-13.8 years), affecting 71 (32.0%) of the novel therapeutics. The median time from approval to first postmarket safety event was 4.2 years (IQR, 2.5-6.0 years), and the proportion of novel therapeutics affected by a postmarket safety event at 10 years was 30.8% (95% CI, 25.1%-37.5%). In multivariable analysis, postmarket safety events were statistically significantly more frequent among biologics (incidence rate ratio [IRR] = 1.93; 95% CI, 1.06-3.52; P = .03), therapeutics indicated for the treatment of psychiatric disease (IRR = 3.78; 95% CI, 1.77-8.06; P < .001), those receiving accelerated approval (IRR = 2.20; 95% CI, 1.15-4.21; P = .02), and those with near-regulatory deadline approval (IRR = 1.90; 95% CI, 1.19-3.05; P = .008); events were statistically significantly less frequent among those with regulatory review times less than 200 days (IRR = 0.46; 95% CI, 0.24-0.87; P = .02). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Among 222 novel therapeutics approved by the FDA from 2001 through 2010, 32% were affected by a postmarket safety event. Biologics, psychiatric therapeutics, and accelerated and near-regulatory deadline approval were statistically significantly associated with higher rates of events, highlighting the need for continuous monitoring of the safety of novel therapeutics throughout their life cycle.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28492899      PMCID: PMC5815036          DOI: 10.1001/jama.2017.5150

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA        ISSN: 0098-7484            Impact factor:   56.272


  9 in total

1.  Regulatory anticipation of postmarket safety problems for novel medicines approved by the EMA between 2001 and 2010: a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Jean-David Zeitoun; Jérémie H Lefèvre; Nicholas S Downing; Henri Bergeron; Joseph S Ross
Journal:  Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf       Date:  2015-11-11       Impact factor: 2.890

2.  Regulatory review of novel therapeutics--comparison of three regulatory agencies.

Authors:  Nicholas S Downing; Jenerius A Aminawung; Nilay D Shah; Joel B Braunstein; Harlan M Krumholz; Joseph S Ross
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2012-05-16       Impact factor: 91.245

3.  An improved approach to measuring drug innovation finds steady rates of first-in-class pharmaceuticals, 1987-2011.

Authors:  Michael Lanthier; Kathleen L Miller; Clark Nardinelli; Janet Woodcock
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 6.301

4.  Drug-review deadlines and safety problems.

Authors:  Daniel Carpenter; Evan James Zucker; Jerry Avorn
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2008-03-27       Impact factor: 91.245

5.  Inappropriate use of bivariable analysis to screen risk factors for use in multivariable analysis.

Authors:  G W Sun; T L Shook; G L Kay
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 6.437

6.  Efficacy and safety concerns are important reasons why the FDA requires multiple reviews before approval of new drugs.

Authors:  Joseph S Ross; Kristina Dzara; Nicholas S Downing
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 6.301

7.  Era of faster FDA drug approval has also seen increased black-box warnings and market withdrawals.

Authors:  Cassie Frank; David U Himmelstein; Steffie Woolhandler; David H Bor; Sidney M Wolfe; Orlaith Heymann; Leah Zallman; Karen E Lasser
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 6.301

8.  Uptake of new drugs in the early post-approval period in the Mini-Sentinel distributed database.

Authors:  Katrina Mott; David J Graham; Sengwee Toh; Joshua J Gagne; Mark Levenson; Yong Ma; Marsha E Reichman
Journal:  Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf       Date:  2016-05-04       Impact factor: 2.890

9.  Clinical trial evidence supporting FDA approval of novel therapeutic agents, 2005-2012.

Authors:  Nicholas S Downing; Jenerius A Aminawung; Nilay D Shah; Harlan M Krumholz; Joseph S Ross
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2014 Jan 22-29       Impact factor: 56.272

  9 in total
  78 in total

Review 1.  Safety of Biologics, Including Biosimilars: Perspectives on Current Status and Future Direction.

Authors:  Ylenia Ingrasciotta; Paola M Cutroneo; Ilaria Marcianò; Thijs Giezen; Fabiola Atzeni; Gianluca Trifirò
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2018-11       Impact factor: 5.606

2.  Cost recovery by Health Canada and drug safety: a time-series analysis.

Authors:  Joel Lexchin
Journal:  CMAJ Open       Date:  2018-10-18

3.  Learning predictive models of drug side-effect relationships from distributed representations of literature-derived semantic predications.

Authors:  Justin Mower; Devika Subramanian; Trevor Cohen
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2018-10-01       Impact factor: 4.497

4.  Is pharmacovigilance of biologicals cost-effective?

Authors:  Barbara Claus
Journal:  Int J Clin Pharm       Date:  2018-07-26

5.  Real-World Evidence: Promise and Peril For Medical Product Evaluation.

Authors:  Sanket S Dhruva; Joseph S Ross; Nihar R Desai
Journal:  P T       Date:  2018-08

6.  EFFICACY-TO-EFFECTIVENESS CLINICAL TRIALS.

Authors:  Harry P Selker; Sheeona Gorman; Kenneth I Kaitin
Journal:  Trans Am Clin Climatol Assoc       Date:  2018

Review 7.  Toward Small-Molecule Inhibition of Protein-Protein Interactions: General Aspects and Recent Progress in Targeting Costimulatory and Coinhibitory (Immune Checkpoint) Interactions.

Authors:  Damir Bojadzic; Peter Buchwald
Journal:  Curr Top Med Chem       Date:  2018       Impact factor: 3.295

8.  New and incremental FDA black box warnings from 2008 to 2015.

Authors:  Michael T Solotke; Sanket S Dhruva; Nicholas S Downing; Nilay D Shah; Joseph S Ross
Journal:  Expert Opin Drug Saf       Date:  2017-12-17       Impact factor: 4.250

9.  Evaluation of Serious Postmarket Safety Signals Within 2 Years of FDA Approval for New Cancer Drugs.

Authors:  Janice Kim; Abhilasha Nair; Patricia Keegan; Julia A Beaver; Paul G Kluetz; Richard Pazdur; Meredith Chuk; Gideon M Blumenthal
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2019-12-17

Review 10.  Psychoactive drug exposure during breastfeeding: a critical need for preclinical behavioral testing.

Authors:  Irving Zucker
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2018-03-16       Impact factor: 4.530

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.