Literature DB >> 27146123

Uptake of new drugs in the early post-approval period in the Mini-Sentinel distributed database.

Katrina Mott1,2, David J Graham1, Sengwee Toh3, Joshua J Gagne4, Mark Levenson5, Yong Ma5, Marsha E Reichman1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Several factors limit the statistical power of drug safety surveillance during the early post-approval period, including uptake of the drug and lag in data availability. This study characterized new drug uptake in the Mini-Sentinel Distributed Database and determined statistical power to detect levels of risk in post-launch safety assessments.
METHODS: The cumulative exposure among initiators of 46 new molecular entities approved from 2008 to 2011 was assessed. Using a Poisson estimation method, minimum incidence rate ratios (IRRs) detectable, with 80% power, were calculated under varying background incidence rates.
RESULTS: Twelve products (26.1%) had more than 15 000 new users after 2 years. With comparator group incidence rate of 1/1000 person-years, 16 (33.3%) products had enough exposure to detect an IRR of 5 with 24 months of data collected that would be available for assessment at 33 months post-launch. With an incidence rate of 5/1000 person-years, 23 (50%) products had enough exposure to detect an IRR of ≥3 with 2 years of data collected. At 33 months post-launch, only two (4.3%) of the drugs examined had enough data availability to detect IRR of <2, and eight (17.4%) of <3, with a background rate of 1/1000 person-years.
CONCLUSION: This study highlights the importance of drug uptake and data availability in early post-approval drug safety surveillance in Mini-Sentinel. There is limited ability to detect rate ratios below three for events with background rates of 1/1000 person-years or lower. This is largely due to low product uptake.
Copyright © 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. Copyright © 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Sentinel; active surveillance; distributed databases; drug safety; new molecular entities; pharmacoepidemiology

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27146123     DOI: 10.1002/pds.4013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf        ISSN: 1053-8569            Impact factor:   2.890


  3 in total

1.  The Potential Return on Public Investment in Detecting Adverse Drug Effects.

Authors:  Krista F Huybrechts; Rishi J Desai; Moa Park; Joshua J Gagne; Mehdi Najafzadeh; Jerry Avorn
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 2.983

2.  Quantifying the utilization of medical devices necessary to detect postmarket safety differences: A case study of implantable cardioverter defibrillators.

Authors:  Jonathan Bates; Craig S Parzynski; Sanket S Dhruva; Andreas Coppi; Richard Kuntz; Shu-Xia Li; Danica Marinac-Dabic; Frederick A Masoudi; Richard E Shaw; Frederick Warner; Harlan M Krumholz; Joseph S Ross
Journal:  Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf       Date:  2018-06-12       Impact factor: 2.890

3.  Postmarket Safety Events Among Novel Therapeutics Approved by the US Food and Drug Administration Between 2001 and 2010.

Authors:  Nicholas S Downing; Nilay D Shah; Jenerius A Aminawung; Alison M Pease; Jean-David Zeitoun; Harlan M Krumholz; Joseph S Ross
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2017-05-09       Impact factor: 56.272

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.