| Literature DB >> 28491138 |
Nida Anwar1, Aisha Arshad1, Muhammad Nadeem1, Sana Khurram1, Naveena Fatima1, Sumaira Sharif1, Saira Shan1, Tahir Shamsi1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) are clonal stem cell disorders exhibiting cytopenias, ineffective hematopoiesis and morphological dysplasia. Bone marrow cytogenetics, inspite of being incorporated as mandatory tool in diagnosis are done less frequently due to limited availability of this technique in Pakistan. The aim of the study was to study baseline clinicohematological and cytogenetic characteristics of patients presenting with de novo MDS.Entities:
Keywords: Clinicohematological characteristics; Cytogenetics; Karyotype; Myelodysplastic syndromes
Year: 2017 PMID: 28491138 PMCID: PMC5423005 DOI: 10.1186/s13039-017-0318-4
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Mol Cytogenet ISSN: 1755-8166 Impact factor: 2.009
Fig. 1Frequency of MDS patients according to WHO subtype. RCMD = Refractory Cytopenia(s) with Multilineage Dysplasia. RAEB II = Refractory Anemia with Excess Blasts II. RAEB I = Refractory Anemia with Excess Blast I. RA = Refractory Anemia, RCUD = Refractory Cytopenias with Unilineage Dysplasia, RARS = Refractory Anemia with Ringed Sideroblasts, RCMD-RS = Refractory Cytopenias with Multilineage Dysplasia and Ringed Sideroblasts, RCC = Refractory Cytopenias of Childhood
Fig. 2IPSS scoring of patients
Hematological characteristics in comparison with national and international studies
| Variables | Present study | Pakistan 1 | Pakistan 2 | Pakistan 3 | China 6 | Korea 7 | India 8 | Turkey 9 | Greece 10 | Taiwan 11 | Singapore 12 | Spain 13 | Germany 14 | Poland 15 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total No. of Patients | 177 | 45 | 46 | 71 | 508 | 176 | 40 | 54 | 855 | 189 | 43 | 640 | 216 | 863 |
| Median age(years) | 51.7 | 64 | Mean 43.09 | 60 | 49 | 57 | 42 | 67 | 73.1 | 56 | Mean 64 | 66 | 73 | 70 |
| Mean Hb (g/dl) | 7.8 | 7.7 | 6.52 | – | 6.3 | – | 6.84 | 9.0 | 9.5 | 8 .0 | 7.7 | – | – | 9.1 |
| Mean MCV (fl) | 90 | 89.4 | 89.4 | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | 97 |
| Mean TLC (×109/l) | 8.8 | 5.7 | 3.4 | – | 3.0 | – | 4.45 | 3.8 | 7.52 | 3.3 | 5.6 | – | – | – |
| Mean Platelet (×109/l) | 82 | 83 | 60 | – | 42 | – | 85 | 163 | 158 | 61 | 101 | – | – | 129 |
| MDS Category | ||||||||||||||
| RCMD % | 22 | 53.3 | 52.2 | 52 | – | 37 | 10 | – | 14.3 | – | – | - | 31 | 28.3 |
| RAEB-II % | 19.7 | 4.4 | 6.5 | 23.9 | 21.1 | 21 | 15 | 30 | 14.4 | 18.5 | 7 | 12 | 11 | 19.6 |
| RAEB-I % | 19.2 | 4.4 | 6.5 | 11.3 | 27 | 29 | 18 | 7 | 18.9 | 40.7 | 16.3 | 32 | 8 | 13.9 |
| Hypoplastic MDS % | 13 | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – |
| RA % | 9 | – | – | 8.5 | 43.9 | 12 | 37 | 57 | 20.6 | 32.5 | 38.1 | 29 | 9 | 19.7 |
| RARS % | 7.9 | – | – | 2.8 | 2.8 | – | 7.5 | – | 6.2 | 8 | 14 | 12 | 4 | 6.7 |
| RCUD % | 3.3 | 22.2 | RCUD–RA 26 | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – |
| RCMD-RS % | 2.8 | – | 2.2 | 1.4 | – | – | 2.5 | – | 2.8 | – | – | – | 13 | 2.1 |
| MDS with 5q % | 2.20 | – | – | – | – | – | 10 | 6 | 1.9 | – | – | – | 2 | 4.6 |
| RCC % | 0.5 | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – |
| MDS-U % | – | 15.5 | 6.5 | – | – | 1 | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | 5.1 |
Cytogenetic profile in comparison with national and international studies
| Variables | Present study | Pakistan 1 | Pakistan 2 | Pakistan 3 | China 6 | Korea 7 | India 8 | Turkey 9 | Greece 10 | Taiwan 11 | Singapore 12 | Spain 13 | Germany 14 | Poland 15 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cytogenetics available/Total No. of patients | 98/177 | – | – | 71/71 | 367/508 | – | 40/40 | 54/54 | 591/855 | 175/189 | 40/43 | 640/640 | – | 276/863 |
| Normal Karyotype % | 55 | – | – | 57.7 | 62.9 | – | 53 | 85 | 61.6 | 53.1 | 52.5 | 49 | – | 44.6 |
| Abnormal Karyotype % | 44 | – | – | 42.3 | 37.1 | – | 47 | 15 | 38.4 | 46.8 | 47.5 | 51 | – | 55.4 |
| Complex Karyotype % | 12 | – | – | 15.5 | 38.9 | – | – | – | 7.6 | 17.2 | 20 | 14 | – | 6.4 |
| Monosomy 7% | 7.1 | – | – | – | – | – | 32 | – | – | |||||
| Del(5q) % | 6.1 | – | – | 2.8 | 12.5 | – | 6 | 2.7 | 9.1 | 15 | 5 | – | 19 | |
| Del(7q) % | 2 | – | – | 4.2 | 4.4 | – | 3 | 14.9 | 7.5 | 4 | – | 1.8 | ||
| Trisomy 8% | 3 | – | – | 9.9 | 25.7 | – | 16 | 9 | 8.3 | 12 | 10 | 5 | – | 2.2 |
| Del(20q) % | 4 | – | – | 1.4 | 14.7 | – | 2.2 | 6.3 | 1 | – | 0.3 | |||
| Trisomy 21% | 1 | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – |
| t(1;9) (q11;q34) along with Del(9q)a % | 1 | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – |
| Trisomy 8 with Del(7q)b % | 1 | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – |
| t(6:9) (p23;q23)b % | 1 | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – |
| Monosomy 7,8b % | 1 | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – |
| Del(9q)b % | 2 | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – |
aunique cytogenetic findings in our study
brare cytogenetics
Cytogenetics of patients in each WHO category
| Total No. of cytogenetic performed | Normal karyotype | Abnormal karyotype | Chromosomal Abnormalities (N) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| WHO subtype: | (%) | (%) | (%) | |
| RCMD | 22.4 | 10.2 | 12.2 | t(6;9) (p23;q23) (1) |
| RAEB II | 27.5 | 13.2 | 14.20 | Del(9q) (1),del(5q) (1), del(7q) (2), del(20q) (2) |
| RAEB-I | 16.32 | 7.14 | 9.1 | Del(9q) (1), Del(20q) (1) |
| Hypoplastic MDS | 11.2 | 9.1 | 2.04 | +8 with del(7q) (1) |
| RA | 7.14 | 6.12 | 1.02 | 47,XY,+11,+17,del(20q) (1) |
| RCUD | 5.1 | 4.08 | 1.02 | t(1;9) (q11;q34) along with del(9q) (1) |
| RARS | 2.04 | 2.04 | – | |
| RCMD-RS | 2.04 | 2.04 | – | |
| MDS with 5q | 5.10 | 5.10 | Del5q (5) | |
| RCC | 1.02 | 1.02 | – |