Literature DB >> 28488114

A simple morphological classification to estimate the malignant potential of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors.

Atsushi Oba1, Atsushi Kudo2, Keiichi Akahoshi1, Mitsuhiro Kishino3, Takumi Akashi4, Eriko Katsuta1, Yasuhito Iwao1, Hiroaki Ono1, Yusuke Mitsunori1, Daisuke Ban1, Shinji Tanaka5, Yoshinobu Eishi4, Ukihide Tateishi3, Minoru Tanabe1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: A novel morphological classification using resected specimens predicted malignant potential and prognosis in patients with pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (P-NETs). The aim of this study was to examine the predictive ability of morphological diagnoses made using non-invasive multi-detector computed tomography (MDCT) in P-NETs.
METHODS: Between 2002 and 2015, 154 patients were diagnosed with P-NETs at the Tokyo Medical and Dental University, and 82 patients who underwent surgical treatment were enrolled. The primary tumors were classified by MDCT into three types: Type I, simple nodular tumor; Type II, simple nodular tumor with extra-nodular growth; and Type III, confluent multinodular tumor. Patients were stratified by 15 clinical specialists according to classification and without any other clinical or pathological information. Clinicopathological features and patient survival were reviewed retrospectively.
RESULTS: The mean observation time was 1004 days. Forty-six, 22, and 14 patients had Type I, II, and III tumors, respectively. Morphological classification was significantly correlated with advanced features such as tumor size, Ki-67 index, and synchronous liver metastasis (p < 0.001 for all). There were significant differences between all three tumor types as judged by ENETS TNM classification (p < 0.001), AJCC TNM classification (p = 0.046), WHO 2004 classification (p < 0.001), and WHO 2010 classification (p < 0.001). Five-year progression-free survival (PFS) rates for patients with Type I, II, and III tumors were 97, 43, and 31%, respectively (I vs. II, p < 0.001; I vs. III, p < 0.001; II vs. III, p = 0.017). Multivariate analysis revealed Type II/III tumors and synchronous liver metastasis to be independent risk factors for poor PFS.
CONCLUSION: A novel simple morphological classification system would predict Type II and III tumors that may have higher malignant potential than Type I tumors.

Entities:  

Keywords:  AJCC TNM classification; Confluent multinodular; ENETS TNM classification; Morphological classification; Multi-detector computed tomography; Pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors; Single nodular with extra-nodular growth; WHO 2010 classification

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28488114     DOI: 10.1007/s00535-017-1349-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gastroenterol        ISSN: 0944-1174            Impact factor:   7.527


  17 in total

Review 1.  Classification and pathology of gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms.

Authors:  Günter Klöppel
Journal:  Endocr Relat Cancer       Date:  2011-10-17       Impact factor: 5.678

2.  Proposal of objective morphological classification system for hepatocellular carcinoma using preoperative multiphase computed tomography.

Authors:  Hisashi Nakayama; Tadatoshi Takayama; Takao Okubo; Tokio Higaki; Yutaka Midorikawa; Masamichi Moriguchi; Akiyoshi Itoh
Journal:  J Gastroenterol       Date:  2013-11-16       Impact factor: 7.527

3.  Preoperative Identification of a Prognostic Factor for Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors Using Multiphase Contrast-Enhanced Computed Tomography.

Authors:  Suguru Yamada; Tsutomu Fujii; Kojiro Suzuki; Yoshikuni Inokawa; Mitsuro Kanda; Goro Nakayama; Hiroyuki Sugimoto; Masahiko Koike; Shuji Nomoto; Michitaka Fujiwara; Akimasa Nakao; Yasuhiro Kodera
Journal:  Pancreas       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 3.327

4.  Modified Staging Classification for Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors on the Basis of the American Joint Committee on Cancer and European Neuroendocrine Tumor Society Systems.

Authors:  Guopei Luo; Ammar Javed; Jonathan R Strosberg; Kaizhou Jin; Yu Zhang; Chen Liu; Jin Xu; Kevin Soares; Matthew J Weiss; Lei Zheng; Christopher L Wolfgang; Mauro Cives; Joyce Wong; Wei Wang; Jian Sun; Chenghao Shao; Wei Wang; Huangying Tan; Jie Li; Quanxing Ni; Lin Shen; Minhu Chen; Jin He; Jie Chen; Xianjun Yu
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2016-09-30       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 5.  One hundred years after "carcinoid": epidemiology of and prognostic factors for neuroendocrine tumors in 35,825 cases in the United States.

Authors:  James C Yao; Manal Hassan; Alexandria Phan; Cecile Dagohoy; Colleen Leary; Jeannette E Mares; Eddie K Abdalla; Jason B Fleming; Jean-Nicolas Vauthey; Asif Rashid; Douglas B Evans
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2008-06-20       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 6.  Therapy of metastatic pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (pNETs): recent insights and advances.

Authors:  Tetsuhide Ito; Hisato Igarashi; Robert T Jensen
Journal:  J Gastroenterol       Date:  2012-08-11       Impact factor: 7.527

7.  Pancreatic endocrine tumors: tumor blood flow assessed with perfusion CT reflects angiogenesis and correlates with prognostic factors.

Authors:  Gaspard d'Assignies; Anne Couvelard; Stéphane Bahrami; Marie-Pierre Vullierme; Pascal Hammel; Olivia Hentic; Alain Sauvanet; Pierre Bedossa; Philippe Ruszniewski; Valérie Vilgrain
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2008-12-18       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 8.  Multi-detector row CT of pancreatic islet cell tumors.

Authors:  Karen M Horton; Ralph H Hruban; Charles Yeo; Elliot K Fishman
Journal:  Radiographics       Date:  2006 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 5.333

9.  Gross appearance of hepatocellular carcinoma reflects E-cadherin expression and risk of early recurrence after surgical treatment.

Authors:  Jun Inayoshi; Takafumi Ichida; Soichi Sugitani; Yasunori Tsuboi; Takuya Genda; Nobuyuki Honma; Hitoshi Asakura
Journal:  J Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 4.029

10.  Predictive factors of microvascular invasion in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma larger than 5 cm.

Authors:  Yasuhiko Nagano; Hiroshi Shimada; Kazuhisa Takeda; Michio Ueda; Kenichi Matsuo; Kuniya Tanaka; Itaru Endo; Chikara Kunisaki; Shinji Togo
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 3.352

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  Prognostic and predictive factors on overall survival and surgical outcomes in pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors: recent advances and controversies.

Authors:  Lingaku Lee; Tetsuhide Ito; Robert T Jensen
Journal:  Expert Rev Anticancer Ther       Date:  2019-11-27       Impact factor: 4.512

2.  Preoperative prediction of lymph node metastasis in nonfunctioning pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors from clinical and MRI features: a multicenter study.

Authors:  Hai-Bin Zhu; Pei Nie; Liu Jiang; Juan Hu; Xiao-Yan Zhang; Xiao-Ting Li; Ming Lu; Ying-Shi Sun
Journal:  Insights Imaging       Date:  2022-10-08
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.