Literature DB >> 27646952

Modified Staging Classification for Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors on the Basis of the American Joint Committee on Cancer and European Neuroendocrine Tumor Society Systems.

Guopei Luo1, Ammar Javed1, Jonathan R Strosberg1, Kaizhou Jin1, Yu Zhang1, Chen Liu1, Jin Xu1, Kevin Soares1, Matthew J Weiss1, Lei Zheng1, Christopher L Wolfgang1, Mauro Cives1, Joyce Wong1, Wei Wang1, Jian Sun1, Chenghao Shao1, Wei Wang1, Huangying Tan1, Jie Li1, Quanxing Ni1, Lin Shen1, Minhu Chen1, Jin He1, Jie Chen1, Xianjun Yu1.   

Abstract

Purpose The European Neuroendocrine Tumor Society (ENETS) and the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) staging classifications are two widely used systems in managing pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors. However, there is no universally accepted system. Methods An analysis was performed to evaluate the application of the ENETS and AJCC staging classifications using the SEER registry (N = 2,529 patients) and a multicentric series (N = 1,143 patients). A modified system was proposed based on analysis of the two existing classifications. The modified system was then validated. Results The proportion of patients with AJCC stage III disease was extremely low for both the SEER series (2.2%) and the multicentric series (2.1%). For the ENETS staging system, patients with stage I disease had a similar prognosis to patients with stage IIA disease, and patients with stage IIIB disease had a lower hazard ratio for death than did patients with stage IIIA disease. We modified the ENETS staging classification by maintaining the ENETS T, N, and M definitions and adopting the AJCC staging definitions. The proportion of patients with stage III disease using the modified ENETS (mENETS) system was higher than that of the AJCC system in both the SEER series (8.9% v 2.2%) and the multicentric series (11.6% v 2.1%). In addition, the hazard ratio of death for patients with stage III disease was higher than that for patients with stage IIB disease. Moreover, statistical significance and proportional distribution were observed in the mENETS staging classification. Conclusion An mENETS staging classification is more suitable for pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors than either the AJCC or ENETS systems and can be adopted in clinical practice.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27646952     DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2016.67.8193

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0732-183X            Impact factor:   44.544


  41 in total

Review 1.  Pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors: A review of serum biomarkers, staging, and management.

Authors:  Zu-Yi Ma; Yuan-Feng Gong; Hong-Kai Zhuang; Zi-Xuan Zhou; Shan-Zhou Huang; Yi-Ping Zou; Bo-Wen Huang; Zhong-Hai Sun; Chuan-Zhao Zhang; Yun-Qiang Tang; Bao-Hua Hou
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2020-05-21       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 2.  The functioning side of the pancreas: a review on insulinomas.

Authors:  I Maggio; V Mollica; N Brighi; G Lamberti; L Manuzzi; A D Ricci; D Campana
Journal:  J Endocrinol Invest       Date:  2019-07-31       Impact factor: 4.256

3.  Role of Lymph Node Resection and Histopathological Evaluation in Accurate Staging of Nonfunctional Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors: How Many Are Enough?

Authors:  Ding Ding; Ammar A Javed; Chunhui Yuan; Michael J Wright; Zunaira N Javed; Jonathan A Teinor; I Chae Ye; Richard A Burkhart; John L Cameron; Matthew J Weiss; Christopher L Wolfgang; Jin He
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2020-02-05       Impact factor: 3.452

4.  Letter regarding "Complementary role of computed tomography texture analysis for differentiation of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma from pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors in the portal-venous enhancement phase".

Authors:  Shuai Ren; Zhongqiu Wang
Journal:  Abdom Radiol (NY)       Date:  2020-10-16

5.  Carbohydrate antigen 19-9 as a prognostic biomarker in pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors.

Authors:  Guopei Luo; Kaizhou Jin; He Cheng; Chen Liu; Meng Guo; Yu Lu; Chao Yang; Jinzhi Xu; Wenquan Wang; Heli Gao; Shirong Zhang; Jiang Long; Jin Xu; Quanxing Ni; Jie Chen; Xianjun Yu
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2017-09-26       Impact factor: 2.967

6.  A simple morphological classification to estimate the malignant potential of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors.

Authors:  Atsushi Oba; Atsushi Kudo; Keiichi Akahoshi; Mitsuhiro Kishino; Takumi Akashi; Eriko Katsuta; Yasuhito Iwao; Hiroaki Ono; Yusuke Mitsunori; Daisuke Ban; Shinji Tanaka; Yoshinobu Eishi; Ukihide Tateishi; Minoru Tanabe
Journal:  J Gastroenterol       Date:  2017-05-09       Impact factor: 7.527

7.  Validation and proposed modification of the 8th edition American Joint Committee on Cancer staging system for patients with esophageal neuroendocrine neoplasms: Evaluation of a revised lymph node classification.

Authors:  Haihong Wang; Yaobing Chen; Guoliang Pi; Ying Zhu; Shengli Yang; Hong Mei; Zhenyu Lin; Tao Zhang
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2020-03-27       Impact factor: 2.967

Review 8.  Prognostic and predictive factors on overall survival and surgical outcomes in pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors: recent advances and controversies.

Authors:  Lingaku Lee; Tetsuhide Ito; Robert T Jensen
Journal:  Expert Rev Anticancer Ther       Date:  2019-11-27       Impact factor: 4.512

Review 9.  Pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors.

Authors:  Jian Sun
Journal:  Intractable Rare Dis Res       Date:  2017-02

10.  Everolimus in the treatment of neuroendocrine tumors: efficacy, side-effects, resistance, and factors affecting its place in the treatment sequence.

Authors:  Lingaku Lee; Tetsuhide Ito; Robert T Jensen
Journal:  Expert Opin Pharmacother       Date:  2018-05-24       Impact factor: 3.889

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.