Literature DB >> 28485618

Raman and Fourier Transform Infrared (FT-IR) Mineral to Matrix Ratios Correlate with Physical Chemical Properties of Model Compounds and Native Bone Tissue.

Erik A Taylor1, Ashley A Lloyd2, Carolina Salazar-Lara2, Eve Donnelly2,3.   

Abstract

Raman and Fourier transform infrared (FT-IR) spectroscopic imaging techniques can be used to characterize bone composition. In this study, our objective was to validate the Raman mineral:matrix ratios (ν1 PO4:amide III, ν1 PO4:amide I, ν1 PO4:Proline + hydroxyproline, ν1 PO4:Phenylalanine, ν1 PO4:δ CH2 peak area ratios) by correlating them to ash fraction and the IR mineral:matrix ratio (ν3 PO4:amide I peak area ratio) in chemical standards and native bone tissue. Chemical standards consisting of varying ratios of synthetic hydroxyapatite (HA) and collagen, as well as bone tissue from humans, sheep, and mice, were characterized with confocal Raman spectroscopy and FT-IR spectroscopy and gravimetric analysis. Raman and IR mineral:matrix ratio values from chemical standards increased reciprocally with ash fraction (Raman ν1 PO4/Amide III: P < 0.01, R2 = 0.966; Raman ν1 PO4/Amide I: P < 0.01, R2 = 0.919; Raman ν1 PO4/Proline + Hydroxyproline: P < 0.01, R2 = 0.976; Raman ν1 PO4/Phenylalanine: P < 0.01, R2 = 0.911; Raman ν1 PO4/δ CH2: P < 0.01, R2 = 0.894; IR P < 0.01, R2 = 0.91). Fourier transform infrared mineral:matrix ratio values from native bone tissue were also similar to theoretical mineral:matrix ratio values for a given ash fraction. Raman and IR mineral:matrix ratio values were strongly correlated ( P < 0.01, R2 = 0.82). These results were confirmed by calculating the mineral:matrix ratio for theoretical IR spectra, developed by applying the Beer-Lambert law to calculate the relative extinction coefficients of HA and collagen over the same range of wavenumbers (800-1800 cm-1). The results confirm that the Raman mineral:matrix bone composition parameter correlates strongly to ash fraction and to its IR counterpart. Finally, the mineral:matrix ratio values of the native bone tissue are similar to those of both chemical standards and theoretical values, confirming the biological relevance of the chemical standards and the characterization techniques.

Entities:  

Keywords:  FT-IR; Fourier transform infrared imaging; Raman imaging; ashing; bone mineral; bone quality; collagen; gravimetric analysis; hydroxyapatite; validation

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28485618     DOI: 10.1177/0003702817709286

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appl Spectrosc        ISSN: 0003-7028            Impact factor:   2.388


  13 in total

1.  The microbial metagenome and bone tissue composition in mice with microbiome-induced reductions in bone strength.

Authors:  Jason D Guss; Erik Taylor; Zach Rouse; Sebastian Roubert; Catherine H Higgins; Corinne J Thomas; Shefford P Baker; Deepak Vashishth; Eve Donnelly; M Kyla Shea; Sarah L Booth; Rodrigo C Bicalho; Christopher J Hernandez
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2019-06-14       Impact factor: 4.398

2.  Bone Tissue Collagen Maturity and Mineral Content Increase With Sustained Hyperglycemia in the KK-Ay Murine Model of Type 2 Diabetes.

Authors:  Heather B Hunt; Jared C Pearl; David R Diaz; Karen B King; Eve Donnelly
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2018-02-08       Impact factor: 6.741

3.  Crystallinity of hydroxyapatite drives myofibroblastic activation and calcification in aortic valves.

Authors:  Jennifer M Richards; Jennie A M R Kunitake; Heather B Hunt; Alexa N Wnorowski; Debra W Lin; Adele L Boskey; Eve Donnelly; Lara A Estroff; Jonathan T Butcher
Journal:  Acta Biomater       Date:  2018-03-02       Impact factor: 8.947

Review 4.  Compositional assessment of bone by Raman spectroscopy.

Authors:  Mustafa Unal; Rafay Ahmed; Anita Mahadevan-Jansen; Jeffry S Nyman
Journal:  Analyst       Date:  2021-12-06       Impact factor: 4.616

Review 5.  Techniques for advanced glycation end product measurements for diabetic bone disease: pitfalls and future directions.

Authors:  Grażyna E Sroga; Samuel J Stephen; Bowen Wang; Deepak Vashishth
Journal:  Curr Opin Endocrinol Diabetes Obes       Date:  2022-07-02       Impact factor: 3.626

Review 6.  Effects of Diabetes on Bone Material Properties.

Authors:  Sashank Lekkala; Erik A Taylor; Heather B Hunt; Eve Donnelly
Journal:  Curr Osteoporos Rep       Date:  2019-12       Impact factor: 5.096

7.  Components of the Gut Microbiome That Influence Bone Tissue-Level Strength.

Authors:  Marysol Luna; Jason D Guss; Laura S Vasquez-Bolanos; Macy Castaneda; Manuela Vargas Rojas; Jasmin M Strong; Denise A Alabi; Sophie D Dornevil; Jacob C Nixon; Erik A Taylor; Eve Donnelly; Xueyan Fu; M Kyla Shea; Sarah L Booth; Rodrigo Bicalho; Christopher J Hernandez
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2021-06-04       Impact factor: 6.390

8.  Altered collagen chemical compositional structure in osteopenic women with past fractures: A case-control Raman spectroscopic study.

Authors:  Gurjit S Mandair; Mohammed P Akhter; Francis W L Esmonde-White; Joan M Lappe; Susan P Bare; William R Lloyd; Jason P Long; Jessica Lopez; Kenneth M Kozloff; Robert R Recker; Michael D Morris
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2021-04-14       Impact factor: 4.626

9.  Radiation-induced changes to bone composition extend beyond periosteal bone.

Authors:  Gurjit S Mandair; Megan E Oest; Kenneth A Mann; Michael D Morris; Timothy A Damron; David H Kohn
Journal:  Bone Rep       Date:  2020-03-28

10.  Chemical effects of diceCT staining protocols on fluid-preserved avian specimens.

Authors:  Catherine M Early; Ashley C Morhardt; Timothy P Cleland; Christopher M Milensky; Gwénaëlle M Kavich; Helen F James
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-09-18       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.