Literature DB >> 34786574

Compositional assessment of bone by Raman spectroscopy.

Mustafa Unal1,2,3, Rafay Ahmed4, Anita Mahadevan-Jansen5,6,7,8,9, Jeffry S Nyman4,5,10,11.   

Abstract

Raman spectroscopy (RS) is used to analyze the physiochemical properties of bone because it is non-destructive and requires minimal sample preparation. With over two decades of research involving measurements of mineral-to-matrix ratio, type-B carbonate substitution, crystallinity, and other compositional characteristics of the bone matrix by RS, there are multiple methods to acquire Raman signals from bone, to process those signals, and to determine peak ratios including sub-peak ratios as well as the full-width at half maximum of the most prominent Raman peak, which is nu1 phosphate (ν1PO4). Selecting which methods to use is not always clear. Herein, we describe the components of RS instruments and how they influence the quality of Raman spectra acquired from bone because signal-to-noise of the acquisition and the accompanying background fluorescence dictate the pre-processing of the Raman spectra. We also describe common methods and challenges in preparing acquired spectra for the determination of matrix properties of bone. This article also serves to provide guidance for the analysis of bone by RS with examples of how methods for pre-processing the Raman signals and for determining properties of bone composition affect RS sensitivity to potential differences between experimental groups. Attention is also given to deconvolution methods that are used to ascertain sub-peak ratios of the amide I band as a way to assess characteristics of collagen type I. We provide suggestions and recommendations on the application of RS to bone with the goal of improving reproducibility across studies and solidify RS as a valuable technique in the field of bone research.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34786574      PMCID: PMC8802336          DOI: 10.1039/d1an01560e

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Analyst        ISSN: 0003-2654            Impact factor:   4.616


  111 in total

1.  Spatial variation in osteonal bone properties relative to tissue and animal age.

Authors:  Samuel Gourion-Arsiquaud; Jayme C Burket; Lorena M Havill; Edward DiCarlo; Stephen B Doty; Richard Mendelsohn; Marjolein C H van der Meulen; Adele L Boskey
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 6.741

2.  Raman and FTIR microscopic imaging of colon tissue: a comparative study.

Authors:  Christoph Krafft; Daniela Codrich; Gloria Pelizzo; Valter Sergo
Journal:  J Biophotonics       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 3.207

Review 3.  Effects of Collagen Crosslinking on Bone Material Properties in Health and Disease.

Authors:  Mitsuru Saito; Keishi Marumo
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  2015-03-20       Impact factor: 4.333

4.  Transcutaneous Raman spectroscopy of murine bone in vivo.

Authors:  Matthew V Schulmerich; Jacqueline H Cole; Jaclynn M Kreider; Francis Esmonde-White; Kathryn A Dooley; Steven A Goldstein; Michael D Morris
Journal:  Appl Spectrosc       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 2.388

5.  Fracture healing with alendronate treatment in the Brtl/+ mouse model of osteogenesis imperfecta.

Authors:  J A Meganck; D L Begun; J D McElderry; A Swick; K M Kozloff; S A Goldstein; M D Morris; J C Marini; M S Caird
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2013-06-14       Impact factor: 4.398

6.  Osteolytic and mixed cancer metastasis modulates collagen and mineral parameters within rat vertebral bone matrix.

Authors:  Mikhail V Burke; Ayelet Atkins; Margarete Akens; Thomas L Willett; Cari M Whyne
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2016-04-13       Impact factor: 3.494

7.  Carbonate assignment and calibration in the Raman spectrum of apatite.

Authors:  Ayorinde Awonusi; Michael D Morris; Mary M J Tecklenburg
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  2007-06-06       Impact factor: 4.333

8.  Novel Raman Spectroscopic Biomarkers Indicate That Postyield Damage Denatures Bone's Collagen.

Authors:  Mustafa Unal; Hyungjin Jung; Ozan Akkus
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2016-01-13       Impact factor: 6.741

9.  Reduced tissue-level stiffness and mineralization in osteoporotic cancellous bone.

Authors:  Grace Kim; Jacqueline H Cole; Adele L Boskey; Shefford P Baker; Marjolein C H van der Meulen
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  2014-06-03       Impact factor: 4.333

10.  Improved prediction of femoral fracture toughness in mice by combining standard medical imaging with Raman spectroscopy.

Authors:  Christine Massie; Emma Knapp; Keren Chen; Andrew J Berger; Hani A Awad
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2021-01-13       Impact factor: 2.712

View more
  1 in total

1.  Why and How Savitzky-Golay Filters Should Be Replaced.

Authors:  Michael Schmid; David Rath; Ulrike Diebold
Journal:  ACS Meas Sci Au       Date:  2022-02-18
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.