| Literature DB >> 28485003 |
Zhaoguo Han1,2, Yongyi Wu1,2, Kai Wang1,2, Yadi Xiao1,2, Zhen Cheng3, Xilin Sun4,5,6, Baozhong Shen7,8.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Mesenchymal-epithelial transition factor also named c-MET is a receptor tyrosine kinase for the hepatocyte growth factor that plays a pivotal role in tumorigenesis. c-MET-targeted therapies have been tested in preclinical models and patients, with significant benefits for cancer treatment. In recent years, many studies have shown that the expression level and activation status of c-MET are closely correlated to c-MET-targeted therapy response and clinical prognosis, thus highlighting the importance of evaluating the c-MET status during and prior to targeted therapy. Molecular imaging allows the monitoring of abnormal alterations of c-MET in real time and in vivo.Entities:
Keywords: Effectiveness evaluation; Malignancy; Molecular imaging; Targeted molecular probe; c-MET
Year: 2017 PMID: 28485003 PMCID: PMC5422222 DOI: 10.1186/s13550-017-0286-z
Source DB: PubMed Journal: EJNMMI Res ISSN: 2191-219X Impact factor: 3.138
Fig. 1A visual overview of the c-MET/HGF signaling pathway with different biological effects and also of representative imaging agents targeting to either extracellular or intracellular domains of c-MET receptor
Representative molecular imaging agents developed for c-MET imaging in cancer
| Name | Nature | Molecular weight (kDa) | Targeted area | Tumor model | Tumor uptake | T/C | Imaging technique | Time point | Clin |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 64Cu-NOTA-rh-HGF | rh-ligand | ~90 | Extracellular | U87MG | 6.8 ± 1.8%ID/g | T/M =13.5 ± 6.1 | PET | 9 h p.i. | No |
| 125I-mAb | mAb | ~150 | Extracellular | S114 | – | T/TB = 0.37 | Gamma camera | 3 days p.i. | No |
| 125I-Met3 | mAb | ~150 | Extracellular | S114, SK-LMS-1/HGF | 18.6 ± 2.1%EIA, | T/TB = 0.32 ± 0.13, T/TB = 0.168 ± 0.076 | Gamma camera | 3 days p.i., 6 days p.i. | No |
| 125I-Met5 | mAb | ~150 | Extracellular | SK-LMS-1/HGF | 13.3 ± 7.6%EIA, | T/TB = 0.146 ± 0.097 | Gamma camera | 1 day p.i. | No |
| 125I-hFab-Met-1 | Fab fragment | ~60 | Extracellular | SK-LMS-1/HGF | 6%EIA | – | Gamma camera | 5 h p.i. | No |
| 125I-MET4 | mAb | ~150 | Extracellular | SK-LMS-1/HGF | – | – | Gamma camera | 3 days p.i. | No |
| 89Zr-DN30 | mAb | ~150 | Extracellular | GTL-16 | 19.6 ± 3.3%ID/g | T/M = 17.5 | PET | 3 days p.i | No |
| 89Zr-df-onartuzumab | mAb | ~99 | Extracellular | MKN-45 | 23%ID/g | T/M = 27 | PET | 3 days p.i | No |
| 89Zr-DFO-H2cys-diabody | scFv | ~55 | Extracellular | Hcc827-GR6 | 3.4 ± 0.3%ID/g | T/M =27 ± 14 | PET | 44 h p.i. | No |
| Ms20-QD | scFv | ~25 | Extracellular | H1993 | – | T/Tn = 4.3 | NIRfluorescence | 24 h p.i. | No |
| anti-MET-Gd-DTPA-albumin | mAb | ~150 | Extracellular | C6 | – | SIC(T/Tn) ≈ 5 | MRI | 3 h p.i. | No |
| SPIO-anti-c-MET | PcAb | ~150 | Extracellular | CDAA-HCC | – | SIC(T/Tn) ≈ 2 | MRI | 1.5 h p.i. | No |
| 125I-Met-pep1 | Peptide | ~1.5 | Extracellular | SK-LMS-1/HGF | 5%EIA, | – | Gamma camera | 4 h p.i. | No |
| 125I-cMBP-GGG | Peptide | ~1.9 | Extracellular | U87MG | 7.05 ± 1.2%ID/g | T/Bl = 2.94 | SPECT | 4 h p.i. | No |
| cMBP-AOC-Cy5.5 | Peptide | ~2.8 | Extracellular | U87MG | – | T/M =33.711 ± 3.34 | NIRfluorescence | 5 h p.i. | No |
| GE-137 | Peptide | ~4.2 | Extracellular | SKOv3 | – | T/Ba = 1.6 | NIRfluorescence | 3 h p.i. | Yes |
| 18F-AH113804 | Peptide | ~3.2 | Extracellular | HCC1954 | 1.5 ± 0.2%ID/ml | T/M ≈ 2 | PET | 1 h p.i. | No |
| 99mTc-AH113018 | Peptide | ~3.2 | Extracellular | MKN-45 | 10.1 ± 1.5%ID/g | T/M =55.2 ± 13.4 | SPECT | 1.5 h p.i. | No |
| 89Zr-PRS-110 | s-protein | 57 | Extracellular | H441 | 7.5 ± 3.4%ID/g | T:M = 29 | PET | 48 h p.i. | No |
| 11C- SU11274 | smTKI | ~0.6 | Intracellular | H1975 | SUV = 0.45 | T/TN = 2.6 | PET | 1.3 h p.i. | No |
Tumor model major positive tumor model, Tumor uptake highest tumor uptake in major positive tumor model, T/C tumor control area activity ratio, Time point optimal imaging time point, Clin clinical transformation, %EIA percentage of estimated injected activity, SUV standard uptake value, T/M tumor to muscle, T/TB tumor to total body, T/T tumor to tumor with non-specific probe, SIC signal intensity changes, T/Bl tumor to blood, T/Ba tumor to background fluorescence, T/T tumor to negative tumor
Fig. 2Coronal micro-PET images of c-Met expression in U87-MG and MDA-MB-231 bearing mice at serial timepoint post-injection of 64Cu-NOTArh-HGF or 64Cu-NOTA-dnrh-HGF are shown, and tumors are indicated by arrows. With permission from reference [41]
Fig. 3In vivo fluorescence imaging of U87-MG bearing xenografts after iv injection of cMBP-GGG-Cy5.5 (left) or cMBP-AOC-Cy5.5 (right), of which red arrows indicate the tumor (T) or kidney (K). With permission from reference [63]
Fig. 489Zr-PRS-110 micro-PET imaging of H441-bearing mice. a Transversal and coronal micro-PET images of the mice are shown at different timepoint post-injection of tracer. b Micro-PET data quantification expressed as mean standardized uptake value (SUVmean) was performed for normal organ and tumor in all mice. With permission from reference [74]