UNLABELLED: Anticalins are a novel class of biopharmaceuticals, displaying highly desirable attributes as imaging agents. The anticalin PRS-110 was rationally engineered to target the oncogene MET with high affinity and specificity. The aim of this study was to visualize MET expression and analyze biodistribution of (89)Zr-labeled PRS-110 in human tumor-bearing mice. METHODS: (89)Zr-PRS-110 was generated. For biodistribution studies (96 h after injection of tracer) 10 μg of (89)Zr-PRS-110 (with 0-490 μg of unlabeled PRS-110) were injected into BALB/c mice bearing high MET-expressing H441 non-small cell lung cancer xenografts. Further characterization with PET imaging was performed at 6, 24, 48, and 96 h after injection of 50 μg of (89)Zr-PRS-110 into mice bearing H441, primary glioblastoma U87-MG (intermediate MET), or ovarian cancer A2780 (low MET) xenografts. Drug distribution was also analyzed ex vivo using fluorescently labeled PRS-110. RESULTS: Biodistribution analyses showed a dose-dependent tumor uptake of (89)Zr-PRS-110, with the highest fractional tumor uptake at 10 μg of (89)Zr-PRS-110, with no unlabeled PRS-110. Small-animal PET imaging supported by biodistribution data revealed specific tumor uptake of (89)Zr-PRS-110 in the MET-expressing H441 and U87-MG tumors whereas the MET-negative A2780 tumor model showed a lower uptake similar to a non-MET binder anticalin control. Tumor uptake increased up to 24 h after tracer injection and remained high, whereas uptake in other organs decreased over time. Ex vivo fluorescence revealed intracellular presence of PRS-110. CONCLUSION: (89)Zr-PRS-110 specifically accumulates in MET-expressing tumors in a receptor density-dependent manner. PET imaging provides real-time noninvasive information about PRS-110 distribution and tumor accumulation in preclinical models.
UNLABELLED: Anticalins are a novel class of biopharmaceuticals, displaying highly desirable attributes as imaging agents. The anticalin PRS-110 was rationally engineered to target the oncogene MET with high affinity and specificity. The aim of this study was to visualize MET expression and analyze biodistribution of (89)Zr-labeled PRS-110 in humantumor-bearing mice. METHODS: (89)Zr-PRS-110 was generated. For biodistribution studies (96 h after injection of tracer) 10 μg of (89)Zr-PRS-110 (with 0-490 μg of unlabeled PRS-110) were injected into BALB/c mice bearing high MET-expressing H441 non-small cell lung cancer xenografts. Further characterization with PET imaging was performed at 6, 24, 48, and 96 h after injection of 50 μg of (89)Zr-PRS-110 into mice bearing H441, primary glioblastoma U87-MG (intermediate MET), or ovarian cancer A2780 (low MET) xenografts. Drug distribution was also analyzed ex vivo using fluorescently labeled PRS-110. RESULTS: Biodistribution analyses showed a dose-dependent tumor uptake of (89)Zr-PRS-110, with the highest fractional tumor uptake at 10 μg of (89)Zr-PRS-110, with no unlabeled PRS-110. Small-animal PET imaging supported by biodistribution data revealed specific tumor uptake of (89)Zr-PRS-110 in the MET-expressing H441 and U87-MG tumors whereas the MET-negative A2780 tumor model showed a lower uptake similar to a non-MET binder anticalin control. Tumor uptake increased up to 24 h after tracer injection and remained high, whereas uptake in other organs decreased over time. Ex vivo fluorescence revealed intracellular presence of PRS-110. CONCLUSION: (89)Zr-PRS-110 specifically accumulates in MET-expressing tumors in a receptor density-dependent manner. PET imaging provides real-time noninvasive information about PRS-110 distribution and tumor accumulation in preclinical models.
Authors: Haiming Luo; Hao Hong; Michael R Slater; Stephen A Graves; Sixiang Shi; Yunan Yang; Robert J Nickles; Frank Fan; Weibo Cai Journal: J Nucl Med Date: 2015-04-03 Impact factor: 10.057
Authors: Monique R Bernsen; Klazina Kooiman; Marcel Segbers; Fijs W B van Leeuwen; Marion de Jong Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2015-02-12 Impact factor: 9.236
Authors: Martin Pool; Anton G T Terwisscha van Scheltinga; Arjan Kol; Danique Giesen; Elisabeth G E de Vries; Marjolijn N Lub-de Hooge Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2017-03-19 Impact factor: 9.236
Authors: Dominik Summer; Javad Garousi; Maryam Oroujeni; Bogdan Mitran; Ken G Andersson; Anzhelika Vorobyeva; John Löfblom; Anna Orlova; Vladimir Tolmachev; Clemens Decristoforo Journal: Mol Pharm Date: 2017-12-01 Impact factor: 4.939